LVBench
Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Frame budgets differ by provider API, which complicates comparisons.
- Released
- June 2024
- Kind
- Long videos
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 4 Argon #9 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Recent progress in multimodal large language models has markedly enhanced the understanding of short videos (typically under one minute), and several evaluation datasets have emerged accordingly. However, these advancements fall short of meeting the demands of real-world applications such as embodied intelligence for long-term decision-making, in-depth movie reviews and discussions, and live sports commentary, all of which require comprehension of long videos spanning several hours. To address this gap, we introduce LVBench, a benchmark specifically designed for long video understanding. Our dataset comprises publicly sourced videos and encompasses a diverse set of tasks aimed at long video comprehension and information extraction. LVBench is designed to challenge multimodal models to demonstrate long-term memory and extended comprehension capabilities. Our extensive evaluations reveal that current multimodal models still underperform on these demanding long video understanding tasks. Through LVBench, we aim to spur the development of more advanced models capable of tackling the complexities of long video comprehension. Our data and code are publicly available at: https://lvbench.github.io.
Gemini 4 Argon leads with 91.7%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Seed1.5-VL leads with 64.6% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Gemini 4 Argon leads with 91.7%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 91.7
Gemini 4 Argon
- 87.8
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 85.4
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 81.8
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 78.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 78.0
Seed2.1 Pro
- 76.9
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash
- 76.6
Qwen3.8 Flash
- 76.4
Seed2.0 Pro
- 76.4
Seed2.0 Lite (0428)
- 76.2
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 75.9 Kimi K2.5
- 75.5
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 74.4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 73.6
Qwen3.5-27B
- 73.0
Seed1.8
- 71.4
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 71.4
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 71.2
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 70.0
Qwen3.5-9B
- 66.4
Qwen3.5-4B
- 64.6
Seed1.5-VL
- 63.6
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 62.7
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 59.5 GLM-4.6V
- 57.1
Qwen3.5-2B
- 53.8 GLM-4.5V
- 50.2
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 47.3
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 45.1 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 45.1
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 1
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- 2
Gemini 3.8 Flash 87.8%
- 3
Gemini 3.7 Flash 85.4%
- 4
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.8%
- 5
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 78.7%
- 6
Seed2.1 Pro 78%
- 7
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 76.9%
- 8
Qwen3.8 Flash 76.6%
- 9
Seed2.0 Pro 76.4%
- 10
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 76.4%
- 11
Qwen3.7-Plus 76.2%
- 12 Kimi K2.5 75.9%
- 13
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 75.5%
- 14
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 74.4%
- 15
Qwen3.5-27B 73.6%
- 16
Seed1.8 73%
- 17
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 71.4%
- 18
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 71.4%
- 19
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 71.2%
- 20
Qwen3.5-9B 70%
- 21
Qwen3.5-4B 66.4%
- 22
Seed1.5-VL 64.6%
- 23
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 63.6%
- 24
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 62.7%
- 25 GLM-4.6V 59.5%
- 26
Qwen3.5-2B 57.1%
- 27 GLM-4.5V 53.8%
- 28
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 50.2%
- 29
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 47.3%
- 30 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 45.1%
- 31
Qwen3.5-0.8B 45.1%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1
Seed1.5-VL thinking 64.6%
- 2 GPT-4o Nov 2024 48.9%
- 3
InternVL2_5-78B 43.6%
- 4
mPLUG-Owl3-7B 43.5%
- 5 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 41.3%
- 6 TimeMarker 41.3%
- 7
InternVL2-40B 39.6%
- 8
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 33.1%
- 9 GPT-4o May 2024 30.8%
Source: Official LVBench leaderboard
- 91.7
Gemini 4 Argon
- 87.8
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 85.4
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 81.8
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 78.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 78.0
Seed2.1 Pro
- 76.9
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash
- 76.6
Qwen3.8 Flash
- 76.4
Seed2.0 Pro
- 76.4
Seed2.0 Lite (0428)
- 76.2
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 75.9 Kimi K2.5
- 75.5
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 74.4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 73.6
Qwen3.5-27B
- 73.0
Seed1.8
- 71.4
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 71.4
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 71.2
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 70.0
Qwen3.5-9B
- 66.4
Qwen3.5-4B
- 64.6
Seed1.5-VL
- 63.6
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 62.7
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 59.5 GLM-4.6V
- 57.1
Qwen3.5-2B
- 53.8 GLM-4.5V
- 50.2
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 48.9 GPT-4o
- 47.3
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 45.1 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 45.1
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 43.6
InternVL2_5-78B
- 43.5
mPLUG-Owl3-7B
- 41.3 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
- 41.3 TimeMarker
- 39.6
InternVL2-40B
- 33.1
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 30.8 GPT-4o
- 1
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- 2
Gemini 3.8 Flash 87.8%
- 3
Gemini 3.7 Flash 85.4%
- 4
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.8%
- 5
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 78.7%
- 6
Seed2.1 Pro 78%
- 7
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 76.9%
- 8
Qwen3.8 Flash 76.6%
- 9
Seed2.0 Pro 76.4%
- 10
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 76.4%
- 11
Qwen3.7-Plus 76.2%
- 12 Kimi K2.5 75.9%
- 13
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 75.5%
- 14
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 74.4%
- 15
Qwen3.5-27B 73.6%
- 16
Seed1.8 73%
- 17
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 71.4%
- 18
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 71.4%
- 19
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 71.2%
- 20
Qwen3.5-9B 70%
- 21
Qwen3.5-4B 66.4%
- 22
Seed1.5-VL thinking 64.6%
- 23
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 63.6%
- 24
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 62.7%
- 25 GLM-4.6V 59.5%
- 26
Qwen3.5-2B 57.1%
- 27 GLM-4.5V 53.8%
- 28
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 50.2%
- 29 GPT-4o Nov 2024 48.9%
- 30
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 47.3%
- 31 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 45.1%
- 32
Qwen3.5-0.8B 45.1%
- 33
InternVL2_5-78B 43.6%
- 34
mPLUG-Owl3-7B 43.5%
- 35 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 41.3%
- 36 TimeMarker 41.3%
- 37
InternVL2-40B 39.6%
- 38
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 33.1%
- 39 GPT-4o May 2024 30.8%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official LVBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 91.7% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 87.8% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 85.4% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 81.8% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 78.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 78% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 76.9% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 76.6% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 76.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 76.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 76.2% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | Kimi K2.5 | 75.9% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 75.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 74.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 73.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 73% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 71.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 71.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 71.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 70% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 66.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 64.6% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 63.6% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 62.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | GLM-4.6V | 59.5% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 57.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | GLM-4.5V | 53.8% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 50.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 47.3% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 45.1% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | | 45.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 64.6% | thinking | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 48.9% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 43.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 43.5% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct | 41.3% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | TimeMarker | 41.3% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 39.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 33.1% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 30.8% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 91.7% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 87.8% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 85.4% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 81.8% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 78.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 78% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 76.9% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 76.6% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 76.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 76.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 76.2% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | Kimi K2.5 | 75.9% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 75.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 74.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 73.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 73% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 71.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 71.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 71.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 70% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 66.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 64.6% | thinking | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | | 63.6% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 62.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | GLM-4.6V | 59.5% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 57.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | GLM-4.5V | 53.8% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 50.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 48.9% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 47.3% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 45.1% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | | 45.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 33 | | 43.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 43.5% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct | 41.3% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | TimeMarker | 41.3% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 39.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 33.1% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 30.8% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 21 entries, 9 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2024 5 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in June 2024 10 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official LVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Google DeepMind’s own number for Gemini 3.7 Flash passed 85% in August 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official LVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
3 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | 91.7 | LVBench | |
| Sep 18, 2026 | 76.9 | LVBench | |
| Sep 2, 2026 | 87.8 | LVBench (agentic; static = 87.1%) | |
| Aug 26, 2026 | 76.6 | Long video understanding LVBench | |
| Aug 13, 2026 | 85.4 | LVBench | |
| Aug 3, 2026 | 81.8 | LVBench | |
| Jun 23, 2026 | 78 | LVBench | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 76.2 | LVBench | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 76.4 | LVBench | |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 71.4 | LVBench | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 71.2 | LVBench | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 45.1 | LVBench 45.1/-- (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 57.1 | LVBench 57.1/-- (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 66.4 | LVBench | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 70 | LVBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 71.4 | LVBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 73.6 | LVBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 74.4 | LVBench | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 75.5 | LVBench | |
| Feb 14, 2026 | 76.4 | LVBench (without VideoCut, 80.0 with) | |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 | 75.9 | LVBench |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 73 | LVBench | |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GLM-4.6V | 59.5 | LVBench |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 63.6 | LVBench | |
| Sep 22, 2025 | 50.2 | LVBench | |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 53.8 | LVBench |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 45.1 | LVBench |
| May 12, 2025 | 64.6 | LVBench | |
| Jan 28, 2025 | 47.3 | LVBench |
18 system cards report it, from 5 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | | 91.7 | LVBench (results table, p.5) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 76.9 | LVBench (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Sep 2, 2026 | | 87.8 | LVBench, agentic (results table, p.5). Static = 87.1% | Capabilities |
| Aug 13, 2026 | | 85.4 | LVBench (results table, p.5) | Capabilities |
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 78 | LVBench (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 71.2 | LVBench (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 73 | LVBench (Table 3). 78.9 with the VideoCut tool (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 76.4 | LVBench (Table 9). 80.0 with the VideoCut tool (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 75.9 | LVBench (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Jan 1, 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 59.5 | LVBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 63.6 | LVBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2025 | | 50.2 | LVBench, Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 49.0 (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 53.8 | LVBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 7, 2025 | | 78.7 | LVBench, test, 0-shot (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 7, 2025 | | 62.7 | LVBench, test, 0-shot (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 44 | LVBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2). Table 3 prints 45.1 | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 64.6 | LVBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 64.0 | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 47.3 | LVBench (Table 8) | Capabilities |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 64.6% LVBench | 64.6% Leaderboard, thinking | Same |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%