Benchmark Almanac

CodeCap-Bench

GPT-6 Astra 73.2 leads since October 2026
Not in model cards

Models watch a structured 2D video and write code that re-renders it. The rendered video is compared with the original on visual similarity, object timing and placement, and retained detail.

323 videos in five categories such as apps, 2D games and scientific plots. Headline is overall fine-grained retention. Code and dataset links say coming soon as of November 1st, 2026.

Released
October 2026
Kind
Video captioning
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Code
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Video captioning aims to preserve visual information through compact descriptions, predominantly using natural language. However, precisely expressing fine-grained spatial structures and temporal dynamics in natural language often leads to lengthy and potentially ambiguous descriptions. In this work, we explore Code as Video Caption, a paradigm where executable programs serve as a complementary representation of visual content through graphical primitives, layout rules, and functions of time. To examine whether code captions effectively preserve video information, we compare them with natural language captions on downstream question answering and video reconstruction tasks. Our results show that code captions achieve superior reasoning accuracy and reconstruction fidelity. Despite these advantages, realizing the potential of code captioning depends on whether current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can generate faithful code captions. To systematically assess this capability, we introduce CodeCap-Bench, which comprises 323 videos spanning five categories of structured 2D content, along with fine-grained annotations and a multi-level evaluation framework. Extensive experiments reveal that while leading proprietary MLLMs demonstrate promising code captioning capabilities, they still struggle to faithfully capture complex temporal dynamics, with open-source models lagging substantially behind.

Abstract of CodeCap-Bench: Can Code Serve as a Good Video Caption? (arXiv:2610.37341, CC0)
7
Models scored on its own leaderboard

GPT-6 Astra leads with 73.2 among models released by September 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-6 Astra Agentic 73.2
  2. 2 Claude Opus 5 Agentic 58.8
  3. 3 GPT-6 Sol Non-agentic 53.1
  4. 4 GPT-5.6 Sol Non-agentic 50.0
  5. 5 Qwen 3.8 Max Agentic 48.8
  6. 6 Gemini 3.8 Flash Agentic 47.7
  7. 7 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Agentic 44.3

Source: Official CodeCap-Bench leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Astra 73.2 Agentic, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 5 58.8 Agentic, Pi Agent Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Sol 53.1 Non-agentic Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.6 Sol 50.0 Non-agentic Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen 3.8 Max 48.8 Agentic, Pi Agent Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 3.8 Flash 47.7 Agentic, Pi Agent Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 44.3 Agentic, Pi Agent Sep 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard 1 leader

Source: Official CodeCap-Bench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0

Source: Official CodeCap-Bench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%