CoVEBench
Video editing models follow compositional instructions with several coupled edits to subjects, actions and camera, while unrelated content must stay unchanged.
53 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.
- Made by
- Nanjing University (NJU-LINK)
- Released
- June 2026
- Kind
- Video generation
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
While recent text-guided video editing models excel at elementary tasks (e.g., style transfer, object insertion), real-world user requests are highly compositional. A single prompt often demands multiple coupled edits, such as modifying subjects, actions, and camera views, while strictly preserving unrelated spatiotemporal content. Existing benchmarks, heavily constrained by isolated edits and coarse global metrics, fail to diagnose how models handle such complex workflows. To address this gap, we introduce CoVEBench, a compositional video editing benchmark comprising 416 curated source videos, 626 multi-point editing instructions, and 9,990 fine-grained checklist items. Covering diverse editing dimensions, CoVEBench evaluates models via MLLM-judged instruction compliance and video fidelity, alongside automated metrics for video quality. Extensive experiments reveal that compositional editing remains a profound challenge: current models frequently omit edits, violate preservation constraints, or introduce artifacts when handling multiple operations simultaneously. CoVEBench provides a challenging, diagnostic testbed to advance video editing toward realistic user workflows.
Wan2.7 tops the leaderboard with 56.9
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is HappyHorse 1.0, at 55.2.
- 1 Wan2.7 56.9
- 2 HappyHorse 1.0 55.2
- 3 OmniWeaving 30.1
- 4 Kiwi 29.0
- 5 Ditto 26.5
- 6 Lucy 26.0
- 7 ICVE 25.8
- 8 ReCo 24.4
- 9 InsV2V 14.6
- 10 VACE 9.69
Source: Official CoVEBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wan2.7 | 56.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | HappyHorse 1.0 | 55.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | OmniWeaving | 30.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Kiwi | 29.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Ditto | 26.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | Lucy | 26.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | ICVE | 25.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | ReCo | 24.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | InsV2V | 14.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | VACE | 9.69 | Official leaderboard |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No dated values yet.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%