Benchmark Almanac

EgoTempo

Seed2.0 Pro 71.8% leads since February 2026
Fading

Models answer questions about egocentric videos that require temporal understanding across the whole clip.

Gemini 2.5 report uses the test subset, 0-shot, 256 frames.

Released
March 2025
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 #96 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
April 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
April 2026

In the authors’ words

Understanding fine-grained temporal dynamics is crucial in egocentric videos, where continuous streams capture frequent, close-up interactions with objects. In this work, we bring to light that current egocentric video question-answering datasets often include questions that can be answered using only few frames or commonsense reasoning, without being necessarily grounded in the actual video. Our analysis shows that state-of-the-art Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on these benchmarks achieve remarkably high performance using just text or a single frame as input. To address these limitations, we introduce EgoTempo, a dataset specifically designed to evaluate temporal understanding in the egocentric domain. EgoTempo emphasizes tasks that require integrating information across the entire video, ensuring that models would need to rely on temporal patterns rather than static cues or pre-existing knowledge. Extensive experiments on EgoTempo show that current MLLMs still fall short in temporal reasoning on egocentric videos, and thus we hope EgoTempo will catalyze new research in the field and inspire models that better capture the complexity of temporal dynamics. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/google-research-datasets/egotempo.git.

Abstract of Omnia de EgoTempo: Benchmarking Temporal Understanding of Multi-Modal LLMs in Egocentric Videos (arXiv:2503.13646, CC0)
5
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
4
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Seed2.0 Pro leads with 71.8% among models released by April 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.0 Pro 71.8%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 68.4%
  3. 3 Seed1.8 67%
  4. 4 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 44.3%
  5. 5 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 36.7%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Pro 71.8% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 68.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed1.8 67% Dec 2025 Lab model card
4 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 44.3% Jul 2025 Lab model card
5 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 36.7% Jul 2025 Lab model card

3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in March 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Not tested since Apr 2026
Seed2.0 Pro 71.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8 Gemini 2.5 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 28, 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 68.4 EgoTempo
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 71.8 EgoTempo
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 67 EgoTempo

4 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 67 EgoTempo (Table 3) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 71.8 EgoTempo (Table 9) Capabilities
Jul 7, 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro technical report 44.3 EgoTempo, test, 0-shot, visual-only (Table 6) Capabilities
Jul 7, 2025 Gemini 2.5 Flash technical report 36.7 EgoTempo, test, 0-shot, visual-only (Table 6) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%