Factorio Learning Environment
Agents write Python programs that control a Factorio factory, in lab tasks with fixed resources and in open play. Scored by production throughput, milestones and lab task success.
Versioned releases from 0.2 (May 2025) to 0.4 (March 2026, moved to Factorio 2.0 and added Inspect support). Scores may shift across versions. The board lists 6 models.
- Made by
- Jack Hopkins et al. (FLE team)
- Released
- March 2025
- Kind
- Video games
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 #146 on the capability index
- Last model added
- February 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly saturating existing benchmarks, necessitating new open-ended evaluations. We introduce the Factorio Learning Environment (FLE), based on the game of Factorio, that tests agents in long-term planning, program synthesis, and resource optimization. FLE provides exponentially scaling challenges – from basic automation to complex factories processing millions of resource units per second. We provide two settings: (1) lab-play consisting of eight structured tasks with fixed resources, and (2) open-play with the unbounded task of building the largest factory on an procedurally generated map. We demonstrate across both settings that models still lack strong spatial reasoning. In lab-play, we find that LLMs exhibit promising short-horizon skills, yet are unable to operate effectively in constrained environments, reflecting limitations in error analysis. In open-play, while LLMs discover automation strategies that improve growth (e.g electric-powered drilling), they fail to achieve complex automation (e.g electronic-circuit manufacturing).
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) leads with 293206.0 among models released by February 2025
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in February 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 293206.0
- 2
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 115782.0
- 3 GPT-4o Aug 2024 87599.0
- 4
Llama 3.3 70B 54998.0
- 5
DeepSeek-V3 48585.0
- 6 GPT-4o mini 26756.0
Source: Official Factorio Learning Environment leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 293206.0 | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 115782.0 | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 87599.0 | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 54998.0 | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 48585.0 | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-4o mini | 26756.0 | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Factorio Learning Environment leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Factorio Learning Environment leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Games and long tasks
- ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
- Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Each game scores in-game progress or outcomes, and the board ranks models by their average rank across the games.
Gemini 2.5 Pro 3.90
- MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks.
Seed2.0 Pro 49%
- TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. The score is harmful actions per 100 steps, where lower is better. The board also reports game progress.
Llama 4 Scout 7.00
- GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8%
- Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%