Benchmark Almanac

GPQA Main

Gemini 3 Pro 80.3% leads since November 2025
Gemini 3 Pro 80.3% leads since November 2025
Dropped

Models answer the 448 question main set of GPQA, graduate level biology, chemistry and physics questions written by experts. Scored by accuracy.

Main set of GPQA. The gpqa-diamond record covers the 198 question Diamond subset.

Released
November 2023
Kind
Science questions
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
June 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
November 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We present GPQA, a challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. We ensure that the questions are high-quality and extremely difficult: experts who have or are pursuing PhDs in the corresponding domains reach 65% accuracy (74% when discounting clear mistakes the experts identified in retrospect), while highly skilled non-expert validators only reach 34% accuracy, despite spending on average over 30 minutes with unrestricted access to the web (i.e., the questions are "Google-proof"). The questions are also difficult for state-of-the-art AI systems, with our strongest GPT-4 based baseline achieving 39% accuracy. If we are to use future AI systems to help us answer very hard questions, for example, when developing new scientific knowledge, we need to develop scalable oversight methods that enable humans to supervise their outputs, which may be difficult even if the supervisors are themselves skilled and knowledgeable. The difficulty of GPQA both for skilled non-experts and frontier AI systems should enable realistic scalable oversight experiments, which we hope can help devise ways for human experts to reliably get truthful information from AI systems that surpass human capabilities.

Abstract of GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark (arXiv:2311.12022, CC0)
66
Entries on Stanford HELM’s leaderboard, 60 models we track
3
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
5
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 80.3% among models released by November 2025

Best score per entry from Stanford HELM’s leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 80.3%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in November 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro 80.3%
  2. 2 GPT-5 79.2%
  3. 3 GPT-5 mini 75.6%
  4. 4 o3 75.3%
  5. 5 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 74.9%
  6. 6 o4-mini 73.5%
  7. 7 Grok 4 72.7%
  8. 8 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 72.7%
  9. 9 Claude Opus 4 thinking 10k 70.8%
  10. 10 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 10k 70.6%
  11. 11 Claude Sonnet 4.5 68.6%
  12. 12 gpt-oss-120b 68.4%
  13. 13 GPT-5 nano 67.9%
  14. 14 Grok-3 mini 67.5%
  15. 15 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 66.6%
  16. 16 Palmyra X5 66.1%
  17. 17 GPT-4.1 65.9%
  18. 18 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 65.3%
  19. 19 Llama 4 Maverick 65%
  20. 20 Grok 3 65%
  21. 21 Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B thinking 63%
  22. 22 Qwen3-235B-A22B 62.3%
  23. 23 GPT-4.1 mini 61.4%
  24. 24 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 60.8%
  25. 25 Claude Haiku 4.5 60.5%
  26. 26 GLM-4.5-Air 59.4%
  27. 27 gpt-oss-20b 59.4%
  28. 28 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 56.5%
  29. 29 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.6%
  30. 30 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 53.8%
  31. 31 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 53.4%
  32. 32 Llama 3.1-405B 52.2%
  33. 33 GPT-4o Nov 2024 52%
  34. 34 Amazon Nova Premier 51.8%
  35. 35 Llama 4 Scout 50.7%
  36. 36 GPT-4.1 nano 50.7%
  37. 37 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 50%
  38. 38 Amazon Nova Pro 44.6%
  39. 39 GPT-5.1 44.2%
  40. 40 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 43.7%
  41. 41 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 43.5%
  42. 42 Llama 3.1-70B 42.6%
  43. 43 Qwen2.5-72B 42.6%
  44. 44 palmyra-fin 42.1%
  45. 45 Amazon Nova Lite 39.7%
  46. 46 Palmyra X4 39.5%
  47. 47 Mistral Small 3.1 39.2%
  48. 48 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 39%
  49. 49 Amazon Nova Micro 38.3%
  50. 50 Granite 4.0 H Small 38.3%
  51. 51 palmyra-med 36.8%
  52. 52 GPT-4o mini 36.8%
  53. 53 Claude 3.5 Haiku 36.3%
  54. 54 Qwen2.5-7B 34.1%
  55. 55 Mixtral 8x22B 33.4%
  56. 56 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 32.5%
  57. 57 olmo-2-1124-13b-instruct 31.6%
  58. 58 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 30.9%
  59. 59 granite-4.0-micro 30.7%
  60. 60 Mistral 7B v0.3 30.3%
  61. 61 olmo-2-1124-7b-instruct 29.6%
  62. 62 Mixtral 8x7B 29.6%
  63. 63 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 28.7%
  64. 64 Llama 3.1-8B 24.7%
  65. 65 olmoe-1b-7b-0125-instruct 22%
  66. 66 marin-8b-instruct 16.8%

Source: Stanford HELM’s leaderboard

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro 80.3%
  2. 2 GPT-5 79.2%
  3. 3 GPT-5 mini 75.6%
  4. 4 o3 75.3%
  5. 5 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 74.9%
  6. 6 o4-mini 73.5%
  7. 7 Grok 4 72.7%
  8. 8 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 72.7%
  9. 9 Claude Opus 4 thinking 10k 70.8%
  10. 10 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 10k 70.6%
  11. 11 Claude Sonnet 4.5 68.6%
  12. 12 gpt-oss-120b 68.4%
  13. 13 GPT-5 nano 67.9%
  14. 14 Grok-3 mini 67.5%
  15. 15 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 66.6%
  16. 16 Palmyra X5 66.1%
  17. 17 GPT-4.1 65.9%
  18. 18 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 65.3%
  19. 19 Llama 4 Maverick 65%
  20. 20 Grok 3 65%
  21. 21 Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B thinking 63%
  22. 22 Qwen3-235B-A22B 62.3%
  23. 23 GPT-4.1 mini 61.4%
  24. 24 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 60.8%
  25. 25 Claude Haiku 4.5 60.5%
  26. 26 GLM-4.5-Air 59.4%
  27. 27 gpt-oss-20b 59.4%
  28. 28 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 56.5%
  29. 29 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.6%
  30. 30 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 53.8%
  31. 31 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 53.4%
  32. 32 Llama 3.1-405B 52.2%
  33. 33 GPT-4o Nov 2024 52%
  34. 34 Amazon Nova Premier 51.8%
  35. 35 Llama 4 Scout 50.7%
  36. 36 GPT-4.1 nano 50.7%
  37. 37 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 50%
  38. 38 Claude 3 Opus 49.1%
  39. 39 Amazon Nova Pro 44.6%
  40. 40 Mistral Small 3.1 44.4%
  41. 41 Mistral Small 3.2 44.2%
  42. 42 GPT-5.1 44.2%
  43. 43 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 43.7%
  44. 44 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 43.5%
  45. 45 Llama 3.1-70B 42.6%
  46. 46 Qwen2.5-72B 42.6%
  47. 47 Falcon-H1-34B 41.5%
  48. 48 Amazon Nova Lite 39.7%
  49. 49 Palmyra X4 39.5%
  50. 50 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 39%
  51. 51 Claude 3 Sonnet 38.5%
  52. 52 Amazon Nova Micro 38.3%
  53. 53 Granite 4.0 H Small 38.3%
  54. 54 GPT-4o mini 36.8%
  55. 55 Claude 3.5 Haiku 36.3%
  56. 56 Claude 3 Haiku 35.2%
  57. 57 Qwen2.5-7B 34.1%
  58. 58 Mixtral 8x22B 33.4%
  59. 59 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 32.5%
  60. 60 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 30.9%
  61. 61 granite-4.0-micro 30.7%
  62. 62 Apertus 70B 30.6%
  63. 63 Mistral 7B v0.3 30.3%
  64. 64 Mixtral 8x7B 29.6%
  65. 65 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 28.7%
  66. 66 Llama 3.1-8B 24.7%

Sources: Stanford HELM’s leaderboard and labs’ model cards

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 80.3% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5 79.2% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5 mini 75.6% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
4 o3 75.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 74.9% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
6 o4-mini 73.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Grok 4 72.7% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 72.7% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Opus 4 70.8% thinking 10k May 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Claude Sonnet 4 70.6% thinking 10k May 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Claude Sonnet 4.5 68.6% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
12 gpt-oss-120b 68.4% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
13 GPT-5 nano 67.9% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Grok-3 mini 67.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
15 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 66.6% May 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Palmyra X5 66.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-4.1 65.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 65.3% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Llama 4 Maverick 65% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Grok 3 65% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
21 Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 63% thinking Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Qwen3-235B-A22B 62.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
23 GPT-4.1 mini 61.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
24 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 60.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
25 Claude Haiku 4.5 60.5% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
26 GLM-4.5-Air 59.4% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
27 gpt-oss-20b 59.4% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 56.5% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
29 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.6% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
30 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 53.8% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
31 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 53.4% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
32 Llama 3.1-405B 52.2% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
33 GPT-4o Nov 2024 52% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
34 Amazon Nova Premier 51.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
35 Llama 4 Scout 50.7% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
36 GPT-4.1 nano 50.7% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
37 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 50% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
38 Amazon Nova Pro 44.6% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
39 GPT-5.1 44.2% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
40 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 43.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
41 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 43.5% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
42 Llama 3.1-70B 42.6% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
43 Qwen2.5-72B 42.6% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
44 palmyra-fin 42.1% Official leaderboard
45 Amazon Nova Lite 39.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
46 Palmyra X4 39.5% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
47 Mistral Small 3.1 39.2% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
48 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 39% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
49 Amazon Nova Micro 38.3% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
50 Granite 4.0 H Small 38.3% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
51 palmyra-med 36.8% Official leaderboard
52 GPT-4o mini 36.8% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
53 Claude 3.5 Haiku 36.3% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
54 Qwen2.5-7B 34.1% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
55 Mixtral 8x22B 33.4% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
56 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 32.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
57 olmo-2-1124-13b-instruct 31.6% Official leaderboard
58 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 30.9% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
59 granite-4.0-micro 30.7% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
60 Mistral 7B v0.3 30.3% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
61 olmo-2-1124-7b-instruct 29.6% Official leaderboard
62 Mixtral 8x7B 29.6% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
63 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 28.7% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
64 Llama 3.1-8B 24.7% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
65 olmoe-1b-7b-0125-instruct 22% Official leaderboard
66 marin-8b-instruct 16.8% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 80.3% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5 79.2% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5 mini 75.6% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
4 o3 75.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 74.9% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
6 o4-mini 73.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Grok 4 72.7% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 72.7% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Opus 4 70.8% thinking 10k May 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Claude Sonnet 4 70.6% thinking 10k May 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Claude Sonnet 4.5 68.6% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
12 gpt-oss-120b 68.4% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
13 GPT-5 nano 67.9% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Grok-3 mini 67.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
15 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 66.6% May 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Palmyra X5 66.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-4.1 65.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 65.3% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Llama 4 Maverick 65% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Grok 3 65% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
21 Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 63% thinking Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Qwen3-235B-A22B 62.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
23 GPT-4.1 mini 61.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
24 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 60.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
25 Claude Haiku 4.5 60.5% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
26 GLM-4.5-Air 59.4% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
27 gpt-oss-20b 59.4% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 56.5% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
29 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.6% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
30 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 53.8% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
31 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 53.4% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
32 Llama 3.1-405B 52.2% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
33 GPT-4o Nov 2024 52% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
34 Amazon Nova Premier 51.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
35 Llama 4 Scout 50.7% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
36 GPT-4.1 nano 50.7% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
37 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 50% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
38 Claude 3 Opus 49.1% Mar 2024 Lab model card
39 Amazon Nova Pro 44.6% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
40 Mistral Small 3.1 44.4% Mar 2025 Lab model card
41 Mistral Small 3.2 44.2% Jun 2025 Lab model card
42 GPT-5.1 44.2% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
43 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 43.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
44 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 43.5% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
45 Llama 3.1-70B 42.6% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
46 Qwen2.5-72B 42.6% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
47 Falcon-H1-34B 41.5% May 2025 Lab model card
48 Amazon Nova Lite 39.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
49 Palmyra X4 39.5% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
50 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 39% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
51 Claude 3 Sonnet 38.5% Mar 2024 Lab model card
52 Amazon Nova Micro 38.3% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
53 Granite 4.0 H Small 38.3% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
54 GPT-4o mini 36.8% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
55 Claude 3.5 Haiku 36.3% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
56 Claude 3 Haiku 35.2% Mar 2024 Lab model card
57 Qwen2.5-7B 34.1% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
58 Mixtral 8x22B 33.4% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
59 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 32.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
60 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 30.9% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
61 granite-4.0-micro 30.7% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
62 Apertus 70B 30.6% Sep 2025 Lab model card
63 Mistral 7B v0.3 30.3% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
64 Mixtral 8x7B 29.6% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
65 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 28.7% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
66 Llama 3.1-8B 24.7% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 7 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

12 models have held number one on Stanford HELM’s leaderboard since its release in November 2023 11 models have held number one with claims included since its release in November 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for Stanford HELM’s leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Mistral AI OpenAI Meta Google DeepMind Anthropic xAI
Stanford HELM leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2025
Gemini 3 Pro 80.3%
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2025

Sources: Stanford HELM’s leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On Stanford HELM’s leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro o3 Grok-3 mini Claude 3.7 Sonnet Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) Llama 3.1-405B Mistral 7B v0.3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro Grok-3 mini

Sources: Stanford HELM’s leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since June 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Mistral AI
Technology Innovation Institute
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jun 20, 2025 Mistral Small 3.2 44.2 GPQA Main (5-shot CoT)
May 20, 2025 Falcon-H1-34B 41.5 GPQA
Mar 17, 2025 Mistral Small 3.1 44.4 GPQA Main (5-shot CoT)

5 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 17, 2025 Apertus 70B technical report 30.6 GPQA Main, 0-shot CoT, held-out test suite (Table 21) Capabilities
Jul 30, 2025 Falcon-H1-34B technical report 41.5 GPQA, logprobs 5-shot, read as the main set because GPQA_Diamond is listed separately (Table 24) Capabilities
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Sonnet model card 38.5 GPQA Main, 0-shot CoT. 5-shot CoT 39.1 (Table 8) Capabilities
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Opus model card 49.1 GPQA Main, 0-shot CoT. 5-shot CoT 50.2 (Table 8) Capabilities
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Haiku model card 35.2 GPQA Main, 0-shot CoT. 5-shot CoT 36.4 (Table 8) Capabilities

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Mistral Small 3.1 44.4% GPQA Main (5-shot CoT) 39.2% Leaderboard +5.2 pts

More in Science and reasoning

All 92 in Science and reasoning
  • GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics. Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
  • Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
  • FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics. Intern-S2-397B 87%
  • BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
  • HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels. Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
  • LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%