GPQA Main
Models answer the 448 question main set of GPQA, graduate level biology, chemistry and physics questions written by experts. Scored by accuracy.
Main set of GPQA. The gpqa-diamond record covers the 198 question Diamond subset.
- Made by
- NYU (Rein et al.)
- Released
- November 2023
- Kind
- Science questions
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- June 2025, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- November 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We present GPQA, a challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. We ensure that the questions are high-quality and extremely difficult: experts who have or are pursuing PhDs in the corresponding domains reach 65% accuracy (74% when discounting clear mistakes the experts identified in retrospect), while highly skilled non-expert validators only reach 34% accuracy, despite spending on average over 30 minutes with unrestricted access to the web (i.e., the questions are "Google-proof"). The questions are also difficult for state-of-the-art AI systems, with our strongest GPT-4 based baseline achieving 39% accuracy. If we are to use future AI systems to help us answer very hard questions, for example, when developing new scientific knowledge, we need to develop scalable oversight methods that enable humans to supervise their outputs, which may be difficult even if the supervisors are themselves skilled and knowledgeable. The difficulty of GPQA both for skilled non-experts and frontier AI systems should enable realistic scalable oversight experiments, which we hope can help devise ways for human experts to reliably get truthful information from AI systems that surpass human capabilities.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 80.3% among models released by November 2025
Best score per entry from Stanford HELM’s leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 80.3%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in November 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 80.3
Gemini 3 Pro
- 79.2 GPT-5
- 75.6 GPT-5 mini
- 75.3 o3
- 74.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 73.5 o4-mini
- 72.7 Grok 4
- 72.7
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 70.8 Claude Opus 4
- 70.6 Claude Sonnet 4
- 68.6 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 68.4 gpt-oss-120b
- 67.9 GPT-5 nano
- 67.5 Grok-3 mini
- 66.6
DeepSeek-R1
- 66.1 Palmyra X5
- 65.9 GPT-4.1
- 65.3 Kimi K2
- 65.0
Llama 4 Maverick
- 65.0 Grok 3
- 63.0
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 62.3
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 61.4 GPT-4.1 mini
- 60.8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 60.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 59.4 GLM-4.5-Air
- 59.4 gpt-oss-20b
- 56.5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 55.6
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 53.8
DeepSeek-V3
- 53.4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 52.2
Llama 3.1-405B
- 52.0 GPT-4o
- 51.8
Amazon Nova Premier
- 50.7
Llama 4 Scout
- 50.7 GPT-4.1 nano
- 50.0
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
- 44.6
Amazon Nova Pro
- 44.2 GPT-5.1
- 43.7
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 43.5
Mistral Large 2
- 42.6
Llama 3.1-70B
- 42.6
Qwen2.5-72B
- 42.1 palmyra-fin
- 39.7
Amazon Nova Lite
- 39.5 Palmyra X4
- 39.2
Mistral Small 3.1
- 39.0
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 38.3
Amazon Nova Micro
- 38.3 Granite 4.0 H Small
- 36.8 palmyra-med
- 36.8 GPT-4o mini
- 36.3 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 34.1
Qwen2.5-7B
- 33.4
Mixtral 8x22B
- 32.5 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
- 31.6 olmo-2-1124-13b-instruct
- 30.9
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
- 30.7 granite-4.0-micro
- 30.3
Mistral 7B v0.3
- 29.6 olmo-2-1124-7b-instruct
- 29.6
Mixtral 8x7B
- 28.7
OLMo 2 32B Instruct
- 24.7
Llama 3.1-8B
- 22.0 olmoe-1b-7b-0125-instruct
- 16.8 marin-8b-instruct
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 80.3%
- 2 GPT-5 79.2%
- 3 GPT-5 mini 75.6%
- 4 o3 75.3%
- 5
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 74.9%
- 6 o4-mini 73.5%
- 7 Grok 4 72.7%
- 8
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 72.7%
- 9 Claude Opus 4 thinking 10k 70.8%
- 10 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 10k 70.6%
- 11 Claude Sonnet 4.5 68.6%
- 12 gpt-oss-120b 68.4%
- 13 GPT-5 nano 67.9%
- 14 Grok-3 mini 67.5%
- 15
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 66.6%
- 16 Palmyra X5 66.1%
- 17 GPT-4.1 65.9%
- 18 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 65.3%
- 19
Llama 4 Maverick 65%
- 20 Grok 3 65%
- 21
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B thinking 63%
- 22
Qwen3-235B-A22B 62.3%
- 23 GPT-4.1 mini 61.4%
- 24 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 60.8%
- 25 Claude Haiku 4.5 60.5%
- 26 GLM-4.5-Air 59.4%
- 27 gpt-oss-20b 59.4%
- 28 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 56.5%
- 29
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.6%
- 30
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 53.8%
- 31
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 53.4%
- 32
Llama 3.1-405B 52.2%
- 33 GPT-4o Nov 2024 52%
- 34
Amazon Nova Premier 51.8%
- 35
Llama 4 Scout 50.7%
- 36 GPT-4.1 nano 50.7%
- 37
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 50%
- 38
Amazon Nova Pro 44.6%
- 39 GPT-5.1 44.2%
- 40
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 43.7%
- 41
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 43.5%
- 42
Llama 3.1-70B 42.6%
- 43
Qwen2.5-72B 42.6%
- 44 palmyra-fin 42.1%
- 45
Amazon Nova Lite 39.7%
- 46 Palmyra X4 39.5%
- 47
Mistral Small 3.1 39.2%
- 48
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 39%
- 49
Amazon Nova Micro 38.3%
- 50 Granite 4.0 H Small 38.3%
- 51 palmyra-med 36.8%
- 52 GPT-4o mini 36.8%
- 53 Claude 3.5 Haiku 36.3%
- 54
Qwen2.5-7B 34.1%
- 55
Mixtral 8x22B 33.4%
- 56 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 32.5%
- 57 olmo-2-1124-13b-instruct 31.6%
- 58
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 30.9%
- 59 granite-4.0-micro 30.7%
- 60
Mistral 7B v0.3 30.3%
- 61 olmo-2-1124-7b-instruct 29.6%
- 62
Mixtral 8x7B 29.6%
- 63
OLMo 2 32B Instruct 28.7%
- 64
Llama 3.1-8B 24.7%
- 65 olmoe-1b-7b-0125-instruct 22%
- 66 marin-8b-instruct 16.8%
Source: Stanford HELM’s leaderboard
- 80.3
Gemini 3 Pro
- 79.2 GPT-5
- 75.6 GPT-5 mini
- 75.3 o3
- 74.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 73.5 o4-mini
- 72.7 Grok 4
- 72.7
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 70.8 Claude Opus 4
- 70.6 Claude Sonnet 4
- 68.6 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 68.4 gpt-oss-120b
- 67.9 GPT-5 nano
- 67.5 Grok-3 mini
- 66.6
DeepSeek-R1
- 66.1 Palmyra X5
- 65.9 GPT-4.1
- 65.3 Kimi K2
- 65.0
Llama 4 Maverick
- 65.0 Grok 3
- 63.0
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 62.3
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 61.4 GPT-4.1 mini
- 60.8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 60.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 59.4 GLM-4.5-Air
- 59.4 gpt-oss-20b
- 56.5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 55.6
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 53.8
DeepSeek-V3
- 53.4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 52.2
Llama 3.1-405B
- 52.0 GPT-4o
- 51.8
Amazon Nova Premier
- 50.7
Llama 4 Scout
- 50.7 GPT-4.1 nano
- 50.0
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
- 49.1 Claude 3 Opus
- 44.6
Amazon Nova Pro
- 44.4
Mistral Small 3.1
- 44.2
Mistral Small 3.2
- 44.2 GPT-5.1
- 43.7
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 43.5
Mistral Large 2
- 42.6
Llama 3.1-70B
- 42.6
Qwen2.5-72B
- 41.5
Falcon-H1-34B
- 39.7
Amazon Nova Lite
- 39.5 Palmyra X4
- 39.0
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 38.5 Claude 3 Sonnet
- 38.3
Amazon Nova Micro
- 38.3 Granite 4.0 H Small
- 36.8 GPT-4o mini
- 36.3 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 35.2 Claude 3 Haiku
- 34.1
Qwen2.5-7B
- 33.4
Mixtral 8x22B
- 32.5 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
- 30.9
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
- 30.7 granite-4.0-micro
- 30.6
Apertus 70B
- 30.3
Mistral 7B v0.3
- 29.6
Mixtral 8x7B
- 28.7
OLMo 2 32B Instruct
- 24.7
Llama 3.1-8B
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 80.3%
- 2 GPT-5 79.2%
- 3 GPT-5 mini 75.6%
- 4 o3 75.3%
- 5
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 74.9%
- 6 o4-mini 73.5%
- 7 Grok 4 72.7%
- 8
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 72.7%
- 9 Claude Opus 4 thinking 10k 70.8%
- 10 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 10k 70.6%
- 11 Claude Sonnet 4.5 68.6%
- 12 gpt-oss-120b 68.4%
- 13 GPT-5 nano 67.9%
- 14 Grok-3 mini 67.5%
- 15
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 66.6%
- 16 Palmyra X5 66.1%
- 17 GPT-4.1 65.9%
- 18 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 65.3%
- 19
Llama 4 Maverick 65%
- 20 Grok 3 65%
- 21
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B thinking 63%
- 22
Qwen3-235B-A22B 62.3%
- 23 GPT-4.1 mini 61.4%
- 24 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 60.8%
- 25 Claude Haiku 4.5 60.5%
- 26 GLM-4.5-Air 59.4%
- 27 gpt-oss-20b 59.4%
- 28 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 56.5%
- 29
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.6%
- 30
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 53.8%
- 31
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 53.4%
- 32
Llama 3.1-405B 52.2%
- 33 GPT-4o Nov 2024 52%
- 34
Amazon Nova Premier 51.8%
- 35
Llama 4 Scout 50.7%
- 36 GPT-4.1 nano 50.7%
- 37
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 50%
- 38 Claude 3 Opus 49.1%
- 39
Amazon Nova Pro 44.6%
- 40
Mistral Small 3.1 44.4%
- 41
Mistral Small 3.2 44.2%
- 42 GPT-5.1 44.2%
- 43
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 43.7%
- 44
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 43.5%
- 45
Llama 3.1-70B 42.6%
- 46
Qwen2.5-72B 42.6%
- 47
Falcon-H1-34B 41.5%
- 48
Amazon Nova Lite 39.7%
- 49 Palmyra X4 39.5%
- 50
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 39%
- 51 Claude 3 Sonnet 38.5%
- 52
Amazon Nova Micro 38.3%
- 53 Granite 4.0 H Small 38.3%
- 54 GPT-4o mini 36.8%
- 55 Claude 3.5 Haiku 36.3%
- 56 Claude 3 Haiku 35.2%
- 57
Qwen2.5-7B 34.1%
- 58
Mixtral 8x22B 33.4%
- 59 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 32.5%
- 60
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Sep 2025 30.9%
- 61 granite-4.0-micro 30.7%
- 62
Apertus 70B 30.6%
- 63
Mistral 7B v0.3 30.3%
- 64
Mixtral 8x7B 29.6%
- 65
OLMo 2 32B Instruct 28.7%
- 66
Llama 3.1-8B 24.7%
Sources: Stanford HELM’s leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 80.3% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5 | 79.2% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5 mini | 75.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | o3 | 75.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 74.9% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | o4-mini | 73.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Grok 4 | 72.7% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 72.7% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4 | 70.8% | thinking 10k | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 70.6% | thinking 10k | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 68.6% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | gpt-oss-120b | 68.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | GPT-5 nano | 67.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Grok-3 mini | 67.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 66.6% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Palmyra X5 | 66.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | GPT-4.1 | 65.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 65.3% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 65% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Grok 3 | 65% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 63% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 62.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | GPT-4.1 mini | 61.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 60.8% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 60.5% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | GLM-4.5-Air | 59.4% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | gpt-oss-20b | 59.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 56.5% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 55.6% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 53.8% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 53.4% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 52.2% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 52% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 51.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 50.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | GPT-4.1 nano | 50.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 50% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 44.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | GPT-5.1 | 44.2% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | | 43.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 43.5% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 42.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | 42.6% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | palmyra-fin | 42.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 45 | | 39.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | Palmyra X4 | 39.5% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 39.2% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | | 39% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | 38.3% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | Granite 4.0 H Small | 38.3% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | palmyra-med | 36.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 52 | GPT-4o mini | 36.8% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 36.3% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | | 34.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | | 33.4% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | 32.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | olmo-2-1124-13b-instruct | 31.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 58 | | 30.9% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | granite-4.0-micro | 30.7% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | | 30.3% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | olmo-2-1124-7b-instruct | 29.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 62 | | 29.6% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 63 | | 28.7% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 64 | | 24.7% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 65 | olmoe-1b-7b-0125-instruct | 22% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 66 | marin-8b-instruct | 16.8% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 80.3% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5 | 79.2% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5 mini | 75.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | o3 | 75.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 74.9% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | o4-mini | 73.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Grok 4 | 72.7% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 72.7% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4 | 70.8% | thinking 10k | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 70.6% | thinking 10k | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 68.6% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | gpt-oss-120b | 68.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | GPT-5 nano | 67.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Grok-3 mini | 67.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 66.6% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Palmyra X5 | 66.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | GPT-4.1 | 65.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 65.3% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 65% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Grok 3 | 65% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 63% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 62.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | GPT-4.1 mini | 61.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 60.8% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 60.5% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | GLM-4.5-Air | 59.4% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | gpt-oss-20b | 59.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 56.5% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 55.6% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 53.8% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 53.4% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 52.2% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 52% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 51.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 50.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | GPT-4.1 nano | 50.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 50% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | Claude 3 Opus | 49.1% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 39 | | 44.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | | 44.4% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 41 | | 44.2% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 42 | GPT-5.1 | 44.2% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | 43.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 43.5% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | | 42.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | | 42.6% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 41.5% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 48 | | 39.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | Palmyra X4 | 39.5% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | | 39% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 38.5% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 52 | | 38.3% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | Granite 4.0 H Small | 38.3% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | GPT-4o mini | 36.8% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 36.3% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | Claude 3 Haiku | 35.2% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 57 | | 34.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | | 33.4% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | 32.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | | 30.9% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | granite-4.0-micro | 30.7% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | | 30.6% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 63 | | 30.3% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 64 | | 29.6% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 65 | | 28.7% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 66 | | 24.7% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 7 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
12 models have held number one on Stanford HELM’s leaderboard since its release in November 2023 11 models have held number one with claims included since its release in November 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for Stanford HELM’s leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Stanford HELM’s leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Stanford HELM’s leaderboard and labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since June 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025 | 44.2 | GPQA Main (5-shot CoT) | |
| May 20, 2025 | 41.5 | GPQA | |
| Mar 17, 2025 | 44.4 | GPQA Main (5-shot CoT) |
5 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2025 | | 30.6 | GPQA Main, 0-shot CoT, held-out test suite (Table 21) | Capabilities |
| Jul 30, 2025 | | 41.5 | GPQA, logprobs 5-shot, read as the main set because GPQA_Diamond is listed separately (Table 24) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Sonnet model card | 38.5 | GPQA Main, 0-shot CoT. 5-shot CoT 39.1 (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Opus model card | 49.1 | GPQA Main, 0-shot CoT. 5-shot CoT 50.2 (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Haiku model card | 35.2 | GPQA Main, 0-shot CoT. 5-shot CoT 36.4 (Table 8) | Capabilities |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 44.4% GPQA Main (5-shot CoT) | 39.2% Leaderboard | +5.2 pts |
More in Science and reasoning
- GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics.
Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
- Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
- FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics.
Intern-S2-397B 87%
- BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
- HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels.
Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
- LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%