Benchmark Almanac

OLMo 2 32B Instruct

OLMo 2 32B Instruct places in the top three on 2 benchmarks.

Ai2 Released March 13th, 2025 Family OLMo 2 The lab's model card Compare with others
24
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
2
In the top three
Ai2 Mar 2025

OLMo 2 32B Instruct

Open weights Flagship

116.5 #359 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • PopQA 37.5% #2 /7
  • GPQA Main 28.7% #59 /60
  • Misguided Attention 19.2% #45 /45

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
TruthfulQA 73.2% #4 of 30 Lab model card
PopQA 37.5% #2 of 7 Lab model card
AGIEval 68.3% #15 of 40 Lab model card
IFEval 85.6% #77 of 135 Lab model card
BIG-Bench Hard 70.6% #47 of 73 Lab model card
MMLU 77.3% #89 of 131 Lab model card
DROP 78% #30 of 41 Lab model card
AlpacaEval 2.0 42.8% #12 of 16 Lab model card
LMArena (Elo) 1,252 #262 of 335 Official leaderboard
SwitzerlandQA 62.2% #6 of 7 Official leaderboard
MMLU-Pro 52.7% #153 of 167 Lab model card
IFEval-OOD 33.1% #1 of 1 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GSM8K 87.6% #53 of 92 Lab model card
MATH 49.7% #70 of 99 Lab model card
DeepMind Mathematics 34.7% #3 of 4 Lab model card
GPQA Diamond 35.9% #282 of 302 Lab model card
GPQA Main 28.7% #59 of 60 Official leaderboard
Misguided Attention 19.2% #45 of 45 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
SnakeBench 18 #150 of 188 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Anthropic Red Team 99.3% #26 of 75 Official leaderboard
Tulu 3 Safety Eval 85.9% #3 of 6 Lab model card
SimpleSafetyTests 98% #47 of 75 Official leaderboard
HELM Safety 89.7 #51 of 75 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
HELM Capabilities 47.5 #56 of 60 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 116.5, number 359 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 11 capability results Ai2 reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 113.9 to 119.0. How we compute it.

Its lab's number next to a leaderboard

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
IFEval 85.6% IFEval 78% Leaderboard, strict, share of instructions followed +7.6 pts

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 5 of them aren't in the launch post.