Benchmark Almanac

InstructTTSEval

Text-to-speech models follow natural-language style instructions in English and Chinese across acoustic parameter, descriptive style and role-play tasks. Gemini judges each clip.

The set has 6,000 test cases, 1,000 per task and language, each with reference audio.

Released
June 2025
Kind
Speech recognition and translation
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
January 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
January 2026

In the authors’ words

In modern speech synthesis, paralinguistic information–such as a speaker's vocal timbre, emotional state, and dynamic prosody–plays a critical role in conveying nuance beyond mere semantics. Traditional Text-to-Speech (TTS) systems rely on fixed style labels or inserting a speech prompt to control these cues, which severely limits flexibility. Recent attempts seek to employ natural-language instructions to modulate paralinguistic features, substantially improving the generalization of instruction-driven TTS models. Although many TTS systems now support customized synthesis via textual description, their actual ability to interpret and execute complex instructions remains largely unexplored. In addition, there is still a shortage of high-quality benchmarks and automated evaluation metrics specifically designed for instruction-based TTS, which hinders accurate assessment and iterative optimization of these models. To address these limitations, we introduce InstructTTSEval, a benchmark for measuring the capability of complex natural-language style control. We introduce three tasks, namely Acoustic-Parameter Specification, Descriptive-Style Directive, and Role-Play, including English and Chinese subsets, each with 1k test cases (6k in total) paired with reference audio. We leverage Gemini as an automatic judge to assess their instruction-following abilities. Our evaluation of accessible instruction-following TTS systems highlights substantial room for further improvement. We anticipate that InstructTTSEval will drive progress toward more powerful, flexible, and accurate instruction-following TTS.

Abstract of InstructTTSEval: Benchmarking Complex Natural-Language Instruction Following in Text-to-Speech Systems (arXiv:2506.16381, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Qwen3-TTS-12Hz-1.7B-CustomVoice leads with 83%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Qwen3-TTS-12Hz-1.7B-CustomVoice 83%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-TTS-12Hz-1.7B-CustomVoice 83% Jan 2026 Lab model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-TTS-12Hz-1.7B-CustomVoice 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-TTS-12Hz-1.7B-CustomVoice

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in January 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jan 22, 2026 Qwen3-TTS-12Hz-1.7B-CustomVoice 83 InstructTTSEval-ZH APS, Qwen3-TTS-12Hz-1.7B-CustomVoice

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 18, 2025 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct technical report InstructTTSEval-EN Overall 72.59 (APS 80.60, DSD 77.63, RP 59.54), InstructTTSEval-ZH Overall 70.52 (APS 75.74, DSD 74.3, RP 61.54), no combined score (Table 9) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%