lmgame-Bench
Models play platformer, puzzle and narrative games such as Sokoban, Tetris, 2048 and Candy Crush through a Gym-style API with perception and memory scaffolds.
Labs report per-game scores. UI-TARS-2 reports six games with no aggregate.
- Made by
- Hu et al. (lmgame-org)
- Released
- May 2025
- Kind
- Video games
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Settled by events
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Playing video games requires perception, memory, and planning, exactly the faculties modern large language model (LLM) agents are expected to master. We study the major challenges in using popular video games to evaluate modern LLMs and find that directly dropping LLMs into games cannot make an effective evaluation, for three reasons – brittle vision perception, prompt sensitivity, and potential data contamination. We introduce lmgame-Bench to turn games into reliable evaluations. lmgame-Bench features a suite of platformer, puzzle, and narrative games delivered through a unified Gym-style API and paired with lightweight perception and memory scaffolds, and is designed to stabilize prompt variance and remove contamination. Across 13 leading models, we show lmgame-Bench is challenging while still separating models well. Correlation analysis shows that every game probes a unique blend of capabilities often tested in isolation elsewhere. More interestingly, performing reinforcement learning on a single game from lmgame-Bench transfers both to unseen games and to external planning tasks. Our evaluation code is available at https://github.com/lmgame-org/GamingAgent/lmgame-bench.
o3 leads with 87.7 among models released by August 2025
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 87.7 o3
- 75.1 GPT-5
- 52.1 Grok 4
- 46.5 o1
- 45.2 o4-mini
- 42.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 35.6 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 34.6 Claude Opus 4
- 32.7
DeepSeek-R1
- 31.1 Claude Sonnet 4
- 29.0 Grok-3 mini
- 26.5
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 24.6
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 22.2 gpt-oss-120b
- 20.4 GPT-4.1
- 19.2
DeepSeek-R1
- 17.4 gpt-oss-20b
- 16.9 GPT-4o
- 13.5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 12.5 o1-mini
- 11.7 GLM-4.5
- 11.3
Llama 4 Maverick
- 6.28 Kimi K2
- 1 o3 87.7
- 2 GPT-5 high 75.1
- 3 Grok 4 52.1
- 4 o1 46.5
- 5 o4-mini 45.2
- 6
Gemini 2.5 Pro May 2025 42.0
- 7 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 35.6
- 8 Claude Opus 4 34.6
- 9
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 32.7
- 10 Claude Sonnet 4 31.1
- 11 Grok-3 mini 29.0
- 12
Qwen3-235B-A22B thinking 26.5
- 13
Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 24.6
- 14 gpt-oss-120b 22.2
- 15 GPT-4.1 20.4
- 16
DeepSeek-R1 19.2
- 17 gpt-oss-20b 17.4
- 18 GPT-4o Nov 2024 16.9
- 19 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 13.5
- 20 o1-mini 12.5
- 21 GLM-4.5 11.7
- 22
Llama 4 Maverick 11.3
- 23 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 6.28
Source: Official lmgame-Bench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | o3 | 87.7 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5 | 75.1 | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Grok 4 | 52.1 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | o1 | 46.5 | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | o4-mini | 45.2 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 42.0 | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 35.6 | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4 | 34.6 | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 32.7 | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 31.1 | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Grok-3 mini | 29.0 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 26.5 | thinking | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 24.6 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | gpt-oss-120b | 22.2 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | GPT-4.1 | 20.4 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 19.2 | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | gpt-oss-20b | 17.4 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 16.9 | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 13.5 | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | o1-mini | 12.5 | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | GLM-4.5 | 11.7 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 11.3 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 6.28 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official lmgame-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official lmgame-Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Games and long tasks
- ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
- Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Each game scores in-game progress or outcomes, and the board ranks models by their average rank across the games.
Gemini 2.5 Pro 3.90
- MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks.
Seed2.0 Pro 49%
- TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. The score is harmful actions per 100 steps, where lower is better. The board also reports game progress.
Llama 4 Scout 7.00
- GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8%
- Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%