Benchmark Almanac

MAEB

Only in system cards

Audio embedding models are scored on 30 tasks across speech, music, environmental sound and audio-text retrieval in over 100 languages.

Part of the MTEB framework, with 50+ models in the paper. Google's EmbeddingGemma 2 card reports it as Mean(Task).

Made by
MTEB community
Released
February 2026
Kind
Audio understanding and voice
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce the Massive Audio Embedding Benchmark (MAEB), a large-scale benchmark covering 30 tasks across speech, music, environmental sounds, and cross-modal audio-text reasoning in 100+ languages. We evaluate 50+ models and find that no single model dominates across all tasks: contrastive audio-text models excel at environmental sound classification (e.g., ESC50) but score near random on multilingual speech tasks (e.g., SIB-FLEURS), while speech-pretrained models show the opposite pattern. Clustering remains challenging for all models, with even the best-performing model achieving only modest results. We observe that models excelling on acoustic understanding often perform poorly on linguistic tasks, and vice versa. We also show that the performance of audio encoders on MAEB correlates highly with their performance when used in audio large language models. MAEB is derived from MAEB+, a collection of 98 tasks. MAEB is designed to maintain task diversity while reducing evaluation cost, and it integrates into the MTEB ecosystem for unified evaluation across text, image, and audio modalities. We release MAEB and all 98 tasks along with code and a leaderboard at https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb.

Abstract of MAEB: Massive Audio Embedding Benchmark (arXiv:2602.16008, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

EmbeddingGemma 2 leads with 49.9

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

EmbeddingGemma 2 leads with 49.3 across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

  1. 1 EmbeddingGemma 2 49.9

Source: Labs’ model cards

Source: Official MAEB leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 EmbeddingGemma 2 49.9 Oct 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 EmbeddingGemma 2 49.3 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 24 entries, 1 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
49.2 49.4 49.6 49.8 50.0 49.2 49.4 49.6 49.8 50.0

Sources: Official MAEB leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 6, 2026 EmbeddingGemma 2 model card 49.9 MAEB, Mean(Task), full precision, 768d Capabilities

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
EmbeddingGemma 2 49.9 MAEB, Mean(Task), full precision, 768d 49.3 Leaderboard +0.56

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%