Benchmark Almanac

MINERVA

Seed2.1 Pro 70.7% leads since June 2026
Fading

Models answer complex video questions that need multi-step reasoning, with reference reasoning traces for grading.

Gemini 2.5 report uses the test subset, 0-shot, 1,024 frames.

Made by
Google DeepMind
Released
May 2025
Kind
Long videos
Level
University
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 #96 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
June 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
June 2026

In the authors’ words

Multimodal LLMs are turning their focus to video benchmarks, however most video benchmarks only provide outcome supervision, with no intermediate or interpretable reasoning steps. This makes it challenging to assess if models are truly able to combine perceptual and temporal information to reason about videos, or simply get the correct answer by chance or by exploiting linguistic biases. To remedy this, we provide a new video reasoning dataset called MINERVA for modern multimodal models. Each question in the dataset comes with 5 answer choices, as well as detailed, hand-crafted reasoning traces. Our dataset is multimodal, diverse in terms of video domain and length, and consists of complex multi-step questions. Extensive benchmarking shows that our dataset provides a challenge for frontier open-source and proprietary models. We perform fine-grained error analysis to identify common failure modes across various models, and create a taxonomy of reasoning errors. We use this to explore both human and LLM-as-a-judge methods for scoring video reasoning traces, and find that failure modes are primarily related to temporal localization, followed by visual perception errors, as opposed to logical or completeness errors. The dataset, along with questions, answer candidates and reasoning traces will be publicly available under https://github.com/google-deepmind/neptune?tab=readme-ov-file#minerva.

Abstract of MINERVA: Evaluating Complex Video Reasoning (arXiv:2505.00681, CC0)
6
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
5
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Seed2.1 Pro leads with 70.7% among models released by June 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in June 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.1 Pro 70.7%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 68.5%
  3. 3 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 67.6%
  4. 4 Seed2.0 Pro 66.5%
  5. 5 Seed1.8 62.4%
  6. 6 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 60.7%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.1 Pro 70.7% Jun 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 68.5% Apr 2026 Lab model card
3 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 67.6% Jul 2025 Lab model card
4 Seed2.0 Pro 66.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 Seed1.8 62.4% Dec 2025 Lab model card
6 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 60.7% Jul 2025 Lab model card

3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026
Seed2.1 Pro 70.7%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in June 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro 70.7 Minerva
Apr 28, 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 68.5 Minerva
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 62.4 Minerva

5 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 70.7 Minerva (Table 10) Capabilities
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 62.4 Minerva (Table 3) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 66.5 Minerva, with subtitles (Table 9) Capabilities
Jul 7, 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro technical report 67.6 Minerva, test, 0-shot, visual + subtitles (Table 6) Capabilities
Jul 7, 2025 Gemini 2.5 Flash technical report 60.7 Minerva, test, 0-shot, visual + subtitles (Table 6) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%