MuirBench
Models answer multiple choice questions over sets of several images, including unanswerable variants. Scored by accuracy.
- Made by
- Fei Wang, Xingyu Fu et al.
- Released
- June 2024
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce MuirBench, a comprehensive benchmark that focuses on robust multi-image understanding capabilities of multimodal LLMs. MuirBench consists of 12 diverse multi-image tasks (e.g., scene understanding, ordering) that involve 10 categories of multi-image relations (e.g., multiview, temporal relations). Comprising 11,264 images and 2,600 multiple-choice questions, MuirBench is created in a pairwise manner, where each standard instance is paired with an unanswerable variant that has minimal semantic differences, in order for a reliable assessment. Evaluated upon 20 recent multi-modal LLMs, our results reveal that even the best-performing models like GPT-4o and Gemini Pro find it challenging to solve MuirBench, achieving 68.0% and 49.3% in accuracy. Open-source multimodal LLMs trained on single images can hardly generalize to multi-image questions, hovering below 33.3% in accuracy. These results highlight the importance of MuirBench in encouraging the community to develop multimodal LLMs that can look beyond a single image, suggesting potential pathways for future improvements.
Seed2.0 Pro leads with 81.8% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
IDEFICS-9B-Instruct leads with 35.4% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Seed2.0 Pro leads with 81.8%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Seed2.0 Pro 81.8%
- 2
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 80.1%
- 3
Seed1.8 78.7%
- 4
LongCat-Flash-Omni 77.1%
- 5 GLM-4.6V 77.1%
- 6 GLM-4.5V 75.3%
- 7 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 74.7%
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.7%
- 9
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 59.2%
- 10 LFM2.5-VL-3B 58.3%
- 11
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 47.5%
- 12
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 44.2%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1
IDEFICS-9B-Instruct 35.4%
- 2
LLaVA-v1.6-34B 33.3%
- 3
VILA1.5-13B 33.1%
- 4
Yi-VL-6B 28.7%
- 5
Idefics2-8B 26.1%
- 6
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 24.4%
- 7 llava-v1.5-7b 23.5%
- 8 CogVLM-17B-Chat 20.9%
Source: Official MuirBench leaderboard
- 81.8
Seed2.0 Pro
- 80.1
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 78.7
Seed1.8
- 77.1
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 77.1 GLM-4.6V
- 75.3 GLM-4.5V
- 74.7 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 70.7
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 59.2
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 58.3 LFM2.5-VL-3B
- 47.5
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 44.2
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 35.4
IDEFICS-9B-Instruct
- 33.3
LLaVA-v1.6-34B
- 33.1
VILA1.5-13B
- 28.7
Yi-VL-6B
- 26.1
Idefics2-8B
- 24.4
LLaVA-v1.5-13B
- 23.5 llava-v1.5-7b
- 20.9 CogVLM-17B-Chat
- 1
Seed2.0 Pro 81.8%
- 2
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 80.1%
- 3
Seed1.8 78.7%
- 4
LongCat-Flash-Omni 77.1%
- 5 GLM-4.6V 77.1%
- 6 GLM-4.5V 75.3%
- 7 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 74.7%
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.7%
- 9
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 59.2%
- 10 LFM2.5-VL-3B 58.3%
- 11
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 47.5%
- 12
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 44.2%
- 13
IDEFICS-9B-Instruct 35.4%
- 14
LLaVA-v1.6-34B 33.3%
- 15
VILA1.5-13B 33.1%
- 16
Yi-VL-6B 28.7%
- 17
Idefics2-8B 26.1%
- 18
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 24.4%
- 19 llava-v1.5-7b 23.5%
- 20 CogVLM-17B-Chat 20.9%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official MuirBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 81.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 80.1% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 78.7% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 77.1% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GLM-4.6V | 77.1% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | GLM-4.5V | 75.3% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 74.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 70.7% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 59.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 58.3% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 47.5% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 44.2% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 35.4% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 33.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 33.1% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 28.7% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 26.1% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 24.4% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | llava-v1.5-7b | 23.5% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 20.9% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 81.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 80.1% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 78.7% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 77.1% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GLM-4.6V | 77.1% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | GLM-4.5V | 75.3% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 74.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 70.7% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 59.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 58.3% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 47.5% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 44.2% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 35.4% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 33.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 33.1% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 28.7% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 26.1% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 24.4% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | llava-v1.5-7b | 23.5% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 20.9% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 20 entries, 8 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2024 Number one over time 6 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official MuirBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official MuirBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 58.3 | MuirBench |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 78.7 | MUIRBench | |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GLM-4.6V | 77.1 | MUIRBENCH |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 77.1 | MuirBench | |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 80.1 | MUIRBENCH | |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 75.3 | MUIRBENCH |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 74.7 | MUIRBENCH |
| Mar 27, 2025 | 59.2 | MuirBench |
11 system cards report it, from 6 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 78.7 | MUIRBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 81.8 | MUIRBench (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Jan 1, 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 77.1 | MUIRBENCH, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 80.1 | MUIRBENCH (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 6, 2025 | | 44.2 | MUIRBench, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 33.2 | Capabilities |
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 77.1 | MuirBench (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 47.5 | MuirBench (Table 5), checked on the rendered page | Capabilities |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 75.3 | MUIRBENCH, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 74.7 | MUIRBENCH, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Mar 26, 2025 | | 59.2 | MuirBench (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 70.7 | MuirBench (Table 3) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%