Benchmark Almanac

Multi-SWE-bench

MiniMax-M2.7 52.7% leads since March 2026
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 14.2% leads since April 2025
MiniMax-M2.7 52.7% leads since March 2026
Fading

Agents resolve 1,632 GitHub issues in Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++ repos. Patches must pass the repos' tests.

A 300-instance subset, Multi-SWE-bench flash, followed in July 2025.

Made by
ByteDance Seed
Released
April 2025
Kind
Fixing real repositories
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Kimi K2 Thinking #93 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
March 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
May 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

The task of issue resolving is to modify a codebase to generate a patch that addresses a given issue. However, existing benchmarks, such as SWE-bench, focus almost exclusively on Python, making them insufficient for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse software ecosystems. To address this, we introduce a multilingual issue-resolving benchmark, called Multi-SWE-bench, covering Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++. It includes a total of 1,632 high-quality instances, which were carefully annotated from 2,456 candidates by 68 expert annotators, ensuring that the benchmark can provide an accurate and reliable evaluation. Based on Multi-SWE-bench, we evaluate a series of state-of-the-art models using three representative methods (Agentless, SWE-agent, and OpenHands) and present a comprehensive analysis with key empirical insights. In addition, we launch a Multi-SWE-RL open-source community, aimed at building large-scale reinforcement learning (RL) training datasets for issue-resolving tasks. As an initial contribution, we release a set of 4,723 well-structured instances spanning seven programming languages, laying a solid foundation for RL research in this domain. More importantly, we open-source our entire data production pipeline, along with detailed tutorials, encouraging the open-source community to continuously contribute and expand the dataset. We envision our Multi-SWE-bench and the ever-growing Multi-SWE-RL community as catalysts for advancing RL toward its full potential, bringing us one step closer to the dawn of AGI.

Abstract of Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolving (arXiv:2504.02605, CC0)
10
Models scored in lab cards
9
Launch posts list it, from 3 labs
6
System cards report it, from 3 labs

MiniMax-M2.7 leads with 52.7% among models released by March 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 14.2% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

MiniMax-M2.7 leads with 52.7%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 MiniMax-M2.7 52.7%
  2. 2 MiniMax-M2.5 51.3%
  3. 3 MiniMax-M2.1 49.4%
  4. 4 Seed2.0 Pro 45.2%
  5. 5 Seed1.8 42%
  6. 6 Kimi K2 Thinking 41.9%
  7. 7 MiniMax-M2 36.2%
  8. 8 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 33.5%
  9. 9 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 18.3%
  10. 10 seed-oss-36b-instruct 17%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiniMax-M2.7 52.7% Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 MiniMax-M2.5 51.3% Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 MiniMax-M2.1 49.4% Dec 2025 Lab model card
4 Seed2.0 Pro 45.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 Seed1.8 42% Dec 2025 Lab model card
6 Kimi K2 Thinking 41.9% Nov 2025 Lab model card
7 MiniMax-M2 36.2% Oct 2025 Lab model card
8 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 33.5% Sep 2025 Lab model card
9 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 18.3% Jul 2025 Lab model card
10 seed-oss-36b-instruct 17% Aug 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 14.2% MopenHands Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 9.25% MopenHands Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 7.97% MopenHands Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
4 o1 6.43% MagentLess Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Llama 4 Maverick 6.13% MagentLess Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
6 DeepSeek-R1 5.88% MagentLess Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
7 o3-mini 5.27% high, MSWE-agent Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
8 DeepSeek-V3 4.72% MagentLess Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-4o Nov 2024 3.80% MagentLess Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-72B 2.57% MagentLess Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Doubao-1.5-pro 2.57% MSWE-agent Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiniMax-M2.7 52.7% Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 MiniMax-M2.5 51.3% Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 MiniMax-M2.1 49.4% Dec 2025 Lab model card
4 Seed2.0 Pro 45.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 Seed1.8 42% Dec 2025 Lab model card
6 Kimi K2 Thinking 41.9% Nov 2025 Lab model card
7 MiniMax-M2 36.2% Oct 2025 Lab model card
8 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 33.5% Sep 2025 Lab model card
9 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 18.3% Jul 2025 Lab model card
10 seed-oss-36b-instruct 17% Aug 2025 Lab model card
11 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 14.2% MopenHands Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 9.25% MopenHands Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 7.97% MopenHands Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
14 o1 6.43% MagentLess Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Llama 4 Maverick 6.13% MagentLess Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
16 DeepSeek-R1 5.88% MagentLess Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
17 o3-mini 5.27% high, MSWE-agent Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
18 DeepSeek-V3 4.72% MagentLess Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
19 GPT-4o Nov 2024 3.80% MagentLess Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Qwen2.5-72B 2.57% MagentLess Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Doubao-1.5-pro 2.57% MSWE-agent Jan 2025 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 12 entries, 11 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

8 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in April 2025 Number one over time 9 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind Moonshot AI MiniMax ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2025
Lab claims Not tested since May 2026
MiniMax-M2.7 52.7%

Sources: Official Multi-SWE-bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M2.7 Seed1.8 MiniMax-M2 Kimi K2 Gemini 2.5 Pro Claude 3.7 Sonnet Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M2.7 Seed1.8

Sources: Official Multi-SWE-bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Moonshot AI
MiniMax
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Mar 18, 2026 MiniMax-M2.7 52.7 Multi-SWE Bench
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 45.2 Multi-SWE-Bench
Feb 12, 2026 MiniMax-M2.5 51.3 Multi-SWE-Bench
Dec 23, 2025 MiniMax-M2.1 49.4 Multi-SWE-bench
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 42 Multi-SWE-Bench
Nov 6, 2025 Kimi K2 Thinking 41.9 Multi-SWE-bench, w/ tools
Oct 27, 2025 MiniMax-M2 36.2 Multi-SWE-Bench
Sep 5, 2025 Kimi K2 33.5 Multi-SWE-Bench, ACC
Aug 20, 2025 seed-oss-36b-instruct 17 Multi-SWE-Bench

6 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 26, 2026 MiniMax-M2 technical report 36.2 Multi-SWE-bench, MiniMax-M2 bar, printed label (Figure 9) Capabilities
May 26, 2026 MiniMax-M2.7 technical report 52.7 Multi-SWE-bench, Claude Code scaffold, avg of 4 trials (Table 4) Capabilities
May 26, 2026 MiniMax-M2.5 technical report 51.3 Multi-SWE-bench, Claude Code scaffold, avg of 4 trials (Table 4) Capabilities
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 42 Multi-SWE-Bench (Table 4) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 45.2 Multi-SWE-Bench (Table 11) Capabilities
Jul 21, 2025 Kimi K2 technical report 18.3 Multi-SWE-bench (Pass@1) (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471