Music Arena
Users write a music prompt, listen to tracks from two text-to-music systems, and vote. Preferences, listening data and feedback feed a leaderboard.
An LLM router adapts each prompt to the input types of different music systems. Preference data is released on Hugging Face.
- Released
- July 2025
- Kind
- Audio understanding and voice
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Ranked by votes
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Last model added
- May 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We present Music Arena, an open platform for scalable human preference evaluation of text-to-music (TTM) models. Soliciting human preferences via listening studies is the gold standard for evaluation in TTM, but these studies are expensive to conduct and difficult to compare, as study protocols may differ across systems. Moreover, human preferences might help researchers align their TTM systems or improve automatic evaluation metrics, but an open and renewable source of preferences does not currently exist. We aim to fill these gaps by offering *live* evaluation for TTM. In Music Arena, real-world users input text prompts of their choosing and compare outputs from two TTM systems, and their preferences are used to compile a leaderboard. While Music Arena follows recent evaluation trends in other AI domains, we also design it with key features tailored to music: an LLM-based routing system to navigate the heterogeneous type signatures of TTM systems, and the collection of *detailed* preferences including listening data and natural language feedback. We also propose a rolling data release policy with user privacy guarantees, providing a renewable source of preference data and increasing platform transparency. Through its standardized evaluation protocol, transparent data access policies, and music-specific features, Music Arena not only addresses key challenges in the TTM ecosystem but also demonstrates how live evaluation can be thoughtfully adapted to unique characteristics of specific AI domains. Music Arena is available at: https://music-arena.org . Preference data is available at: https://huggingface.co/music-arena .
Lyria 3 Pro leads with 1,394 among models released by May 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in May 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1,394
Lyria 3 Pro
- 1,333
Stable Audio 3 Medium
- 1,225 Riffusion FUZZ v1.0
- 1,150 Sonauto v2.2
- 1,119 Riffusion FUZZ v1.1
- 1,055 ElevenLabs Music v1
- 1,003
Lyria 3 Clip
- 950 Sonauto v3 Preview
- 911 Magenta RealTime (Large)
- 894 ACE-Step 1.5 Turbo (1.7B)
- 842 Stable Audio Open
- 838 MusicGen Medium
- 809 Magenta RealTime 2 (Base)
- 794 MusicGen Small
- 682 Stable Audio Open Small
Bars start at 600.
- 1
Lyria 3 Pro 1,394
- 2
Stable Audio 3 Medium 1,333
- 3 Riffusion FUZZ v1.0 1,225
- 4 Sonauto v2.2 1,150
- 5 Riffusion FUZZ v1.1 1,119
- 6 ElevenLabs Music v1 1,055
- 7
Lyria 3 Clip 1,003
- 8 Sonauto v3 Preview 950
- 9 Magenta RealTime (Large) 911
- 10 ACE-Step 1.5 Turbo (1.7B) 894
- 11 Stable Audio Open 842
- 12 MusicGen Medium 838
- 13 Magenta RealTime 2 (Base) 809
- 14 MusicGen Small 794
- 15 Stable Audio Open Small 682
Source: Official Music Arena leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 1,394 | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 1,333 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Riffusion FUZZ v1.0 | 1,225 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Sonauto v2.2 | 1,150 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Riffusion FUZZ v1.1 | 1,119 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | ElevenLabs Music v1 | 1,055 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | | 1,003 | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Sonauto v3 Preview | 950 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | Magenta RealTime (Large) | 911 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | ACE-Step 1.5 Turbo (1.7B) | 894 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | Stable Audio Open | 842 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | MusicGen Medium | 838 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | Magenta RealTime 2 (Base) | 809 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | MusicGen Small | 794 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | Stable Audio Open Small | 682 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Music Arena leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Music Arena leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%