OdysseyArena Repo System
Agents operate repositories with changing hidden rules. The score is average task success over four trials.
One track of OdysseyArena. The OdysseyArena record keeps lab scores that combine tracks.
- Made by
- OdysseyArena authors
- Released
- February 2026
- Kind
- Puzzles and chess
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- December 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has catalyzed the development of autonomous agents capable of navigating complex environments. However, existing evaluations primarily adopt a deductive paradigm, where agents execute tasks based on explicitly provided rules and static goals, often within limited planning horizons. Crucially, this neglects the inductive necessity for agents to discover latent transition laws from experience autonomously, which is the cornerstone for enabling agentic foresight and sustaining strategic coherence. To bridge this gap, we introduce OdysseyArena, which re-centers agent evaluation on long-horizon, active, and inductive interactions. We formalize and instantiate four primitives, translating abstract transition dynamics into concrete interactive environments. Building upon this, we establish OdysseyArena-Lite for standardized benchmarking, providing a set of 120 tasks to measure an agent's inductive efficiency and long-horizon discovery. Pushing further, we introduce OdysseyArena-Challenge to stress-test agent stability across extreme interaction horizons (e.g., > 200 steps). Extensive experiments on 15+ leading LLMs reveal that even frontier models exhibit a deficiency in inductive scenarios, identifying a critical bottleneck in the pursuit of autonomous discovery in complex environments. Project homepage: https://os-copilot.github.io/OdysseyArena-Home/
Gemini 3 Pro Preview [snapshot unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 65.8%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-5, at 62.5%.
The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 65.8 Gemini 3 Pro Preview [snapshot unspecified]
- 62.5 GPT-5
- 50.0 Gemini 2.5 Pro [snapshot unspecified]
- 48.3
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 38.3 Grok 4 Fast
- 26.7
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct
- 19.2
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 18.3 gpt-oss-120b
- 15.8
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 13.3 Qwen3-4B-Instruct
- 9.17 GLM-4-32B-0414
- 0.0 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
- 0.0 GLM-4-9B-Chat
- 1 Gemini 3 Pro Preview [snapshot unspecified] 65.8%
- 2 GPT-5 62.5%
- 3 Gemini 2.5 Pro [snapshot unspecified] 50%
- 4
DeepSeek-V3.2 48.3%
- 5 Grok 4 Fast 38.3%
- 6
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct Jul 2025 26.7%
- 7
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 19.2%
- 8 gpt-oss-120b high 18.3%
- 9
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 15.8%
- 10 Qwen3-4B-Instruct 13.3%
- 11 GLM-4-32B-0414 9.17%
- 12 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 0%
- 13 GLM-4-9B-Chat 0%
Source: Official OdysseyArena Repo System leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview [snapshot unspecified] | 65.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | GPT-5 | 62.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Gemini 2.5 Pro [snapshot unspecified] | 50% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | | 48.3% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Grok 4 Fast | 38.3% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 26.7% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 19.2% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | gpt-oss-120b | 18.3% | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 15.8% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Qwen3-4B-Instruct | 13.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | GLM-4-32B-0414 | 9.17% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | Llama 3.1 8B Instruct | 0% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | GLM-4-9B-Chat | 0% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official OdysseyArena Repo System leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official OdysseyArena Repo System leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Games and long tasks
- ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
- Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Each game scores in-game progress or outcomes, and the board ranks models by their average rank across the games.
Gemini 2.5 Pro 3.90
- MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks.
Seed2.0 Pro 49%
- TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. The score is harmful actions per 100 steps, where lower is better. The board also reports game progress.
Llama 4 Scout 7.00
- GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8%
- Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%