Benchmark Almanac

OmniDocBench

Fading

Diverse PDF pages with layout, text, table and formula annotations. Parsing scored by edit distance and TEDS.

The first release has 981 pages and reports edit distance, where lower is better. The repo main branch moved to v1.5 in 2025-09 and v1.6 in 2026-04, and v1.0 lives on branch v1_0.

Released
December 2024
Kind
Documents, charts and text in images
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
May 2026, dropped for a newer version
Last model added
May 2026

In the authors’ words

Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations–ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute–based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.

Abstract of OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations (arXiv:2412.07626, CC0)
3
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
4
System cards report it, from 3 labs

No scores here yet

We have no scores for OmniDocBench yet.

See the live leaderboard on github.com

Labs headline it less often now, last in May 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Meituan
OpenAI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
May 5, 2026 GPT-5.5 Instant 12.5 OmniDocBench (Document Parsing), plotted 12.5, version not stated
Mar 5, 2026 GPT-5.4 10.9 OmniDocBench (normalized edit distance, lower is better), reasoning none
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 22.8 OmniDocBench EN/ZH (lower is better) 22.8 / 29.0

4 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jan 14, 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 21.5 OmniDocBench NED, lower is better, version not stated, SeRe (Table 1) Capabilities
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report OmniDocBench edit distance en 0.155, zh 0.207, lower is better, no overall (Table 2) Capabilities
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 22.8 OmniDocBench EN, lower is better (Table 5). ZH 29.0 Capabilities
Feb 19, 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report OmniDocBench edit distance en 0.226, zh 0.324, lower is better, no overall (Table 5) Capabilities

Versions

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%