OmniDocBench
Diverse PDF pages with layout, text, table and formula annotations. Parsing scored by edit distance and TEDS.
The first release has 981 pages and reports edit distance, where lower is better. The repo main branch moved to v1.5 in 2025-09 and v1.6 in 2026-04, and v1.0 lives on branch v1_0.
- Made by
- Shanghai AI Lab (OpenDataLab)
- Released
- December 2024
- Kind
- Documents, charts and text in images
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a launch post
- May 2026, dropped for a newer version
- Last model added
- May 2026
In the authors’ words
Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations–ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute–based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.
No scores here yet
We have no scores for OmniDocBench yet.
Labs headline it less often now, last in May 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2026 | GPT-5.5 Instant | 12.5 | OmniDocBench (Document Parsing), plotted 12.5, version not stated |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GPT-5.4 | 10.9 | OmniDocBench (normalized edit distance, lower is better), reasoning none |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 22.8 | OmniDocBench EN/ZH (lower is better) 22.8 / 29.0 |
4 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | | 21.5 | OmniDocBench NED, lower is better, version not stated, SeRe (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | OmniDocBench edit distance en 0.155, zh 0.207, lower is better, no overall (Table 2) | Capabilities | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 22.8 | OmniDocBench EN, lower is better (Table 5). ZH 29.0 | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | OmniDocBench edit distance en 0.226, zh 0.324, lower is better, no overall (Table 5) | Capabilities |
Versions
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%