Benchmark Almanac

OmniDocBench v1.6

OXR-1.0 97.0 tops its leaderboard GLM-OCR 95.2 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models parse 1,651 PDF pages, including nested tables, dense formulas and unusual layouts, into text, tables and formulas. Scored by the v1.5 Overall formula.

Adds 296 harder pages and a new matching method, MGAM, on the prediction side. v1.7 on April 30th, 2026 added skills-based evaluation without new pages, so it stays in this record.

Released
April 2026
Kind
Documents, charts and text in images
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
Last model added
January 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations–ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute–based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.

Abstract of OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations (arXiv:2412.07626, CC0)
38
Entries on its own leaderboard, 8 models we track

OXR-1.0 tops the leaderboard with 97.0

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GLM-OCR, at 95.2.

The newest model with a score here came out in January 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 OXR-1.0 97.0
  2. 2 TeleOCR 96.9
  3. 3 OvisOCR2 96.5
  4. 4 MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 96.4
  5. 5 PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 96.3
  6. 6 MinerU2.5-Pro 95.8
  7. 7 GLM-OCR 95.2
  8. 8 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 94.9
  9. 9 PaddleOCR-VL 94.2
  10. 10 Unlimited-OCR 94.0
  11. 11 Qianfan-OCR 93.9
  12. 12 Youtu-Parsing 93.7
  13. 13 Ovis2.6-30B-A3B 93.7
  14. 14 Logics-Parsing-v2 93.3
  15. 15 ABot-OCR 93.3
  16. 16 FireRed-OCR 93.3
  17. 17 MinerU-2.5 93.0
  18. 18 Gemini 3 Pro 92.9
  19. 19 Gemini 3 Flash 92.6
  20. 20 MonkeyOCR V2 91.8
  21. 21 dots.ocr 90.8
  22. 22 OpenDoc-0.1B 90.7
  23. 23 DeepSeek-OCR 2 90.3
  24. 24 HunyuanOCR 90.0
  25. 25 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 89.8
  26. 26 Dolphin-v2 89.5
  27. 27 OCRVerse 88.6
  28. 28 MonkeyOCR-pro-3B 88.6
  29. 29 GPT-5.2 86.6
  30. 30 Dolphin-1.5 86.5
  31. 31 MinerU-Pipeline 86.5
  32. 32 olmOCR 85.7
  33. 33 Mistral OCR 85.7
  34. 34 Kimi K2.5 84.5
  35. 35 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 83.8
  36. 36 Nanonets-OCR-s 83.6
  37. 37 POINTS-Reader 83.4
  38. 38 Marker 78.4

Source: Official OmniDocBench v1.6 leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 OXR-1.0 97.0 Official leaderboard
2 TeleOCR 96.9 Official leaderboard
3 OvisOCR2 96.5 Official leaderboard
4 MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 96.4 Official leaderboard
5 PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 96.3 Official leaderboard
6 MinerU2.5-Pro 95.8 Official leaderboard
7 GLM-OCR 95.2 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
8 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 94.9 Official leaderboard
9 PaddleOCR-VL 94.2 Official leaderboard
10 Unlimited-OCR 94.0 Official leaderboard
11 Qianfan-OCR 93.9 Official leaderboard
12 Youtu-Parsing 93.7 Official leaderboard
13 Ovis2.6-30B-A3B 93.7 Official leaderboard
14 Logics-Parsing-v2 93.3 Official leaderboard
15 ABot-OCR 93.3 Official leaderboard
16 FireRed-OCR 93.3 Official leaderboard
17 MinerU-2.5 93.0 Official leaderboard
18 Gemini 3 Pro 92.9 Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Gemini 3 Flash 92.6 Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
20 MonkeyOCR V2 91.8 Official leaderboard
21 dots.ocr 90.8 Official leaderboard
22 OpenDoc-0.1B 90.7 Official leaderboard
23 DeepSeek-OCR 2 90.3 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
24 HunyuanOCR 90.0 Official leaderboard
25 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 89.8 Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
26 Dolphin-v2 89.5 Official leaderboard
27 OCRVerse 88.6 Official leaderboard
28 MonkeyOCR-pro-3B 88.6 Official leaderboard
29 GPT-5.2 86.6 Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
30 Dolphin-1.5 86.5 Official leaderboard
31 MinerU-Pipeline 86.5 Official leaderboard
32 olmOCR 85.7 Official leaderboard
33 Mistral OCR 85.7 Official leaderboard
34 Kimi K2.5 84.5 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
35 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 83.8 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
36 Nanonets-OCR-s 83.6 Official leaderboard
37 POINTS-Reader 83.4 Official leaderboard
38 Marker 78.4 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Z.ai
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2026
GLM-OCR 95.2

Source: Official OmniDocBench v1.6 leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
85.0 90.0 95.0 2026 85.0 90.0 95.0 2026

Source: Official OmniDocBench v1.6 leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

Versions

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%