Benchmark Almanac

OmniDocBench v1.5

GLM-OCR 94.6 leads since March 2026
GLM-OCR 94.3 leads since January 2026
GLM-OCR 94.6 leads since January 2026
In use

Models parse 1,355 PDF pages into text, tables and formulas. The Overall score averages text accuracy from edit distance, table TEDS and formula CDM.

Adds 374 pages to v1.0, raises newspaper and note scans to 200 DPI, and drops the Chinese and English split. Higher Overall is better, unlike the v1.0 edit distance.

Released
September 2025
Kind
Documents, charts and text in images
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations–ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute–based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.

Abstract of OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations (arXiv:2412.07626, CC0)
9
Models scored in lab cards
34
Launch posts list it, from 12 labs
14
System cards report it, from 9 labs

GLM-OCR leads with 94.6 among models released by August 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

GLM-OCR leads with 94.3 across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

GLM-OCR leads with 94.6, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GLM-OCR 94.6
  2. 2 DeepSeek-OCR 2 91.1
  3. 3 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 84.7
  4. 4 EXAONE 4.5 33B 81.2
  5. 5 Muse Glimmer 75.8
  6. 6 Gemma 4 E2B 0.29
  7. 7 Gemma 4 E4B 0.18
  8. 8 Gemma 4 12B 0.16
  9. 9 GPT-5.4 Mini 0.13

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GLM-OCR 94.6 Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 DeepSeek-OCR 2 91.1 Jan 2026 Lab model card
3 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 84.7 Jun 2026 Lab model card
4 EXAONE 4.5 33B 81.2 Apr 2026 Lab model card
5 Muse Glimmer 75.8 Oct 2026 Lab model card
6 Gemma 4 E2B 0.29 Apr 2026 Lab model card
7 Gemma 4 E4B 0.18 Apr 2026 Lab model card
8 Gemma 4 12B 0.16 Jun 2026 Lab model card
9 GPT-5.4 Mini 0.13 Mar 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GLM-OCR 94.3 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3 Flash 90.4 Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3 Pro 90.2 Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Kimi K2.5 89.3 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
5 DeepSeek-OCR 2 89.2 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 89.2 Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 88.0 Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 87.0 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.2 85.8 Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
10 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 82.7 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
11 InternVL3-78B 80.3 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GLM-OCR 94.6 Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 DeepSeek-OCR 2 91.1 Jan 2026 Lab model card
3 Gemini 3 Flash 90.4 Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3 Pro 90.2 Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Kimi K2.5 89.3 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 89.2 Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 88.0 Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 87.0 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.2 85.8 Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 84.7 Jun 2026 Lab model card
11 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 82.7 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
12 EXAONE 4.5 33B 81.2 Apr 2026 Lab model card
13 InternVL3-78B 80.3 Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Muse Glimmer 75.8 Oct 2026 Lab model card
15 Gemma 4 E2B 0.29 Apr 2026 Lab model card
16 Gemma 4 E4B 0.18 Apr 2026 Lab model card
17 Gemma 4 12B 0.16 Jun 2026 Lab model card
18 GPT-5.4 Mini 0.13 Mar 2026 Lab model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 41 entries, 11 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in September 2025 5 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in September 2025 6 models have held number one with claims included since its release in September 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind Qwen Z.ai DeepSeek
Own leaderboard Replaced by 1.6, Apr 2026
GLM-OCR 94.3
Lab claims 2 leaders
GLM-OCR 94.6

Sources: Official OmniDocBench v1.5 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
0.00 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 2025 2026 0.00 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 2025 2026

Sources: Official OmniDocBench v1.5 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

5 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
ByteDance Seed
Moonshot AI
DeepSeek
Z.ai
Qwen
OpenAI
LG AI Research
Xiaomi Corp
Kuaishou
MiniMax
Meta
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 14, 2026 Qwen 3.8 27B 91.1 Document intelligence OmniDocBench 1.5
Aug 10, 2026 Muse Glimmer 75.8 OmniDocBench v1.5
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 92.1 OmniDocBench 1.5
Jul 16, 2026 Kimi K3 91.1 OmniDocBench
Jun 10, 2026 DiffusionGemma 26B A4B OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better)
Jun 3, 2026 Gemma 4 12B 0.164 OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better)
Jun 1, 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 91.4 OmniDocBench1.5
Jun 1, 2026 MiniMax-M3 91.6 OmniDocBench
May 25, 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 84.7 OmniDocBench1.5
Apr 22, 2026 MiMo-V2.5 87.2 OmniDocBench
Apr 15, 2026 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 89.9 OmniDocBench1.5
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 81.2 OmniDocBench v1.5
Apr 2, 2026 Gemma 4 E4B 0.181 OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better)
Apr 2, 2026 Gemma 4 E2B 0.29 OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better)
Apr 2, 2026 Gemma 4 26B A4B OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better)
Apr 2, 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 91.2 OmniDocBench1.5
Apr 2, 2026 Gemma 4 31B IT OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better)
Mar 17, 2026 GPT-5.4 Nano OmniDocBench 1.5 (no tools), lower is better
Mar 17, 2026 GPT-5.4 Mini 0.126 OmniDocBench 1.5, lower is better
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-0.8B 61 OmniDocBench1.5 61.0/70.6 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-2B 79.8 OmniDocBench1.5 79.8/80.9 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 86.2 OmniDocBench1.5
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 87.7 OmniDocBench1.5
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 89.3 OmniDocBench1.5
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 88.9 OmniDocBench1.5
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 89.8 OmniDocBench1.5
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 90.8 OmniDocBench1.5
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro OmniDocBench 1.5 (normalized edit distance, lower is better)
Jan 30, 2026 GLM-OCR 94.6 OmniDocBench v1.5
Jan 28, 2026 DeepSeek-OCR 2 91.1 OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall 91.09, V-token max 1120, Text Edit 0.048, Formula CDM 90.31, Table TEDS 87.75, Table TEDS-S 92.06, R-order Edit 0.057 (Table 1)
Jan 27, 2026 Kimi K2.5 88.8 OmniDocBench 1.5
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 OmniDocBench 1.5 (normalized edit distance, lower is better)
Dec 17, 2025 Gemini 3 Flash OmniDocBench 1.5 (Overall Edit Distance, lower is better)
Nov 18, 2025 Gemini 3 Pro OmniDocBench 1.5 (Overall Edit Distance, lower is better)

14 system cards report it, from 9 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 23, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B technical report OmniDocBench 1.5 edit distance, lower is better, reasoning, 0.47 non-reasoning (Table 8) Capabilities
Oct 19, 2026 Muse Glimmer technical report 75.8 OmniDocBench v1.5, high (Tables 2 and 5) Capabilities
Jul 27, 2026 Kimi K3 technical report 91.1 OmniDocBench (Table 2) Capabilities
Jul 24, 2026 Gemma 4 E4B technical report 0.181 OmniDocBench 1.5, edit distance lower is better (Table 6) Capabilities
Jul 24, 2026 Gemma 4 E2B technical report 0.29 OmniDocBench 1.5, edit distance lower is better (Table 6) Capabilities
Jul 24, 2026 Gemma 4 31B IT technical report OmniDocBench 1.5, edit distance (lower is better), thinking, max resolution (Table 6) Capabilities
Jul 24, 2026 Gemma 4 26B A4B technical report OmniDocBench 1.5, edit distance (lower is better), thinking, max resolution (Table 6) Capabilities
Jun 9, 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B technical report 84.7 OmniDocBench1.5 overall (Figure 5, printed value) Capabilities
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 81.2 OmniDocBench v1.5 (Table 2, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card OmniDocBench 1.5, normalized edit distance, lower is better (Table 2) Capabilities
Mar 11, 2026 GLM-OCR technical report 94.6 OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall (Tables 3 and 4). Text Edit 0.040, Formula CDM 93.90, Table TEDS 93.96, TEDS-S 96.39, Reading Order Edit 0.044 Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card OmniDocBench 1.5, normalized edit distance, lower is better (Table 8) Capabilities
Jan 30, 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 88.8 OmniDocBench 1.5, (1 minus normalized edit distance) x 100 (Table 4) Capabilities
Jan 28, 2026 DeepSeek-OCR 2 technical report 91.1 OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall 91.09, V-token max 1120, Text Edit 0.048, Formula CDM 90.31, Table TEDS 87.75, Table TEDS-S 92.06, R-order Edit 0.057 (Table 1) Capabilities

2 lab claims next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
DeepSeek-OCR 2 91.1 OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall 91.09, V-token max 1120, Text Edit 0.048, Formula CDM 90.31, Table TEDS 87.75, Table TEDS-S 92.06, R-order Edit 0.057 (Table 1) 89.2 Leaderboard +1.92
GLM-OCR 94.6 OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall (Tables 3 and 4). Text Edit 0.040, Formula CDM 93.90, Table TEDS 93.96, TEDS-S 96.39, Reading Order Edit 0.044 94.3 Leaderboard +0.27

Versions

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%