OmniDocBench v1.5
Models parse 1,355 PDF pages into text, tables and formulas. The Overall score averages text accuracy from edit distance, table TEDS and formula CDM.
Adds 374 pages to v1.0, raises newspaper and note scans to 200 DPI, and drops the Chinese and English split. Higher Overall is better, unlike the v1.0 edit distance.
- Made by
- Shanghai AI Lab (OpenDataLab)
- Released
- September 2025
- Kind
- Documents, charts and text in images
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations–ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute–based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.
GLM-OCR leads with 94.6 among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
GLM-OCR leads with 94.3 across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
GLM-OCR leads with 94.6, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 GLM-OCR 94.6
- 2
DeepSeek-OCR 2 91.1
- 3
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 84.7
- 4
EXAONE 4.5 33B 81.2
- 5
Muse Glimmer 75.8
- 6
Gemma 4 E2B 0.29
- 7
Gemma 4 E4B 0.18
- 8
Gemma 4 12B 0.16
- 9 GPT-5.4 Mini 0.13
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 GLM-OCR 94.3
- 2
Gemini 3 Flash 90.4
- 3
Gemini 3 Pro 90.2
- 4 Kimi K2.5 89.3
- 5
DeepSeek-OCR 2 89.2
- 6
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 89.2
- 7
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 88.0
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 87.0
- 9 GPT-5.2 85.8
- 10
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 82.7
- 11
InternVL3-78B 80.3
Source: Official OmniDocBench v1.5 leaderboard
- 94.6 GLM-OCR
- 91.1
DeepSeek-OCR 2
- 90.4
Gemini 3 Flash
- 90.2
Gemini 3 Pro
- 89.3 Kimi K2.5
- 89.2
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 88.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 87.0
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 85.8 GPT-5.2
- 84.7
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B
- 82.7
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 81.2
EXAONE 4.5 33B
- 80.3
InternVL3-78B
- 75.8
Muse Glimmer
- 0.29
Gemma 4 E2B
- 0.18
Gemma 4 E4B
- 0.16
Gemma 4 12B
- 0.13 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 1 GLM-OCR 94.6
- 2
DeepSeek-OCR 2 91.1
- 3
Gemini 3 Flash 90.4
- 4
Gemini 3 Pro 90.2
- 5 Kimi K2.5 89.3
- 6
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 89.2
- 7
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 88.0
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 87.0
- 9 GPT-5.2 85.8
- 10
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 84.7
- 11
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 82.7
- 12
EXAONE 4.5 33B 81.2
- 13
InternVL3-78B 80.3
- 14
Muse Glimmer 75.8
- 15
Gemma 4 E2B 0.29
- 16
Gemma 4 E4B 0.18
- 17
Gemma 4 12B 0.16
- 18 GPT-5.4 Mini 0.13
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official OmniDocBench v1.5 leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GLM-OCR | 94.6 | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 91.1 | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 84.7 | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 81.2 | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 75.8 | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 0.29 | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 0.18 | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 0.16 | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 0.13 | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GLM-OCR | 94.3 | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 90.4 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 90.2 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Kimi K2.5 | 89.3 | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 89.2 | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 89.2 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 88.0 | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 87.0 | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 | 85.8 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 82.7 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 80.3 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GLM-OCR | 94.6 | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 91.1 | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 90.4 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 90.2 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Kimi K2.5 | 89.3 | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 89.2 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 88.0 | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 87.0 | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 | 85.8 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 84.7 | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 82.7 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 81.2 | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 80.3 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 75.8 | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 0.29 | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 0.18 | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 0.16 | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 0.13 | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 41 entries, 11 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in September 2025 5 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in September 2025 6 models have held number one with claims included since its release in September 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official OmniDocBench v1.5 leaderboard and labs’ model cards
5 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2026 | 91.1 | Document intelligence OmniDocBench 1.5 | |
| Aug 10, 2026 | 75.8 | OmniDocBench v1.5 | |
| Aug 3, 2026 | 92.1 | OmniDocBench 1.5 | |
| Jul 16, 2026 | Kimi K3 | 91.1 | OmniDocBench |
| Jun 10, 2026 | OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better) | ||
| Jun 3, 2026 | 0.164 | OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better) | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 91.4 | OmniDocBench1.5 | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 91.6 | OmniDocBench | |
| May 25, 2026 | 84.7 | OmniDocBench1.5 | |
| Apr 22, 2026 | MiMo-V2.5 | 87.2 | OmniDocBench |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 89.9 | OmniDocBench1.5 | |
| Apr 9, 2026 | 81.2 | OmniDocBench v1.5 | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 0.181 | OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better) | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 0.29 | OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better) | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better) | ||
| Apr 2, 2026 | 91.2 | OmniDocBench1.5 | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | OmniDocBench 1.5 (average edit distance, lower is better) | ||
| Mar 17, 2026 | GPT-5.4 Nano | OmniDocBench 1.5 (no tools), lower is better | |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 0.126 | OmniDocBench 1.5, lower is better |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 61 | OmniDocBench1.5 61.0/70.6 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 79.8 | OmniDocBench1.5 79.8/80.9 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 86.2 | OmniDocBench1.5 | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 87.7 | OmniDocBench1.5 | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 89.3 | OmniDocBench1.5 | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 88.9 | OmniDocBench1.5 | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 89.8 | OmniDocBench1.5 | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 90.8 | OmniDocBench1.5 | |
| Feb 14, 2026 | OmniDocBench 1.5 (normalized edit distance, lower is better) | ||
| Jan 30, 2026 | GLM-OCR | 94.6 | OmniDocBench v1.5 |
| Jan 28, 2026 | 91.1 | OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall 91.09, V-token max 1120, Text Edit 0.048, Formula CDM 90.31, Table TEDS 87.75, Table TEDS-S 92.06, R-order Edit 0.057 (Table 1) | |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 | 88.8 | OmniDocBench 1.5 |
| Dec 18, 2025 | OmniDocBench 1.5 (normalized edit distance, lower is better) | ||
| Dec 17, 2025 | OmniDocBench 1.5 (Overall Edit Distance, lower is better) | ||
| Nov 18, 2025 | OmniDocBench 1.5 (Overall Edit Distance, lower is better) |
14 system cards report it, from 9 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | | OmniDocBench 1.5 edit distance, lower is better, reasoning, 0.47 non-reasoning (Table 8) | Capabilities | |
| Oct 19, 2026 | | 75.8 | OmniDocBench v1.5, high (Tables 2 and 5) | Capabilities |
| Jul 27, 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 91.1 | OmniDocBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | | 0.181 | OmniDocBench 1.5, edit distance lower is better (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | | 0.29 | OmniDocBench 1.5, edit distance lower is better (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | | OmniDocBench 1.5, edit distance (lower is better), thinking, max resolution (Table 6) | Capabilities | |
| Jul 24, 2026 | | OmniDocBench 1.5, edit distance (lower is better), thinking, max resolution (Table 6) | Capabilities | |
| Jun 9, 2026 | | 84.7 | OmniDocBench1.5 overall (Figure 5, printed value) | Capabilities |
| Apr 9, 2026 | | 81.2 | OmniDocBench v1.5 (Table 2, Reasoning mode) | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | OmniDocBench 1.5, normalized edit distance, lower is better (Table 2) | Capabilities | |
| Mar 11, 2026 | GLM-OCR technical report | 94.6 | OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall (Tables 3 and 4). Text Edit 0.040, Formula CDM 93.90, Table TEDS 93.96, TEDS-S 96.39, Reading Order Edit 0.044 | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | OmniDocBench 1.5, normalized edit distance, lower is better (Table 8) | Capabilities | |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 88.8 | OmniDocBench 1.5, (1 minus normalized edit distance) x 100 (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Jan 28, 2026 | | 91.1 | OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall 91.09, V-token max 1120, Text Edit 0.048, Formula CDM 90.31, Table TEDS 87.75, Table TEDS-S 92.06, R-order Edit 0.057 (Table 1) | Capabilities |
2 lab claims next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 91.1 OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall 91.09, V-token max 1120, Text Edit 0.048, Formula CDM 90.31, Table TEDS 87.75, Table TEDS-S 92.06, R-order Edit 0.057 (Table 1) | 89.2 Leaderboard | +1.92 |
| GLM-OCR | 94.6 OmniDocBench v1.5 Overall (Tables 3 and 4). Text Edit 0.040, Formula CDM 93.90, Table TEDS 93.96, TEDS-S 96.39, Reading Order Edit 0.044 | 94.3 Leaderboard | +0.27 |
Versions
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%