OVBench
Video models answer questions about past, current and future moments of an online video stream in 6 task types and 16 subtasks.
Published at CVPR 2025 with the VideoChat-Online model. It is a different test from OVO-Bench.
- Released
- December 2024
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 #167 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- June 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- June 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly progressed in offline video understanding. However, applying these models to real-world scenarios, such as autonomous driving and human-computer interaction, presents unique challenges due to the need for real-time processing of continuous online video streams. To this end, this paper presents systematic efforts from three perspectives: evaluation benchmark, model architecture, and training strategy. First, we introduce OVBench, a comprehensive question-answering benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to perceive, memorize, and reason within online video contexts. It features 6 core task types across three temporal contexts-past, current, and future-forming 16 subtasks from diverse datasets. Second, we propose a new Pyramid Memory Bank (PMB) that effectively retains key spatiotemporal information in video streams. Third, we proposed an offline-to-online learning paradigm, designing an interleaved dialogue format for online video data and constructing an instruction-tuning dataset tailored for online video training. This framework led to the development of VideoChat-Online, a robust and efficient model for online video understanding. Despite the lower computational cost and higher efficiency, VideoChat-Online outperforms existing state-of-the-art offline and online models across popular offline video benchmarks and OVBench, demonstrating the effectiveness of our model architecture and training strategy. % Our approach surpasses existing state-of-the-art offline models Qwen2-VL 7B and online models Flash-VStream, by 4.19% and 23.7% on OVBench, respectively.
Seed2.1 Pro leads with 70% among models released by June 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 50.7% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Seed2.1 Pro leads with 70%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in June 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Seed2.1 Pro 70%
- 2
Seed2.0 Pro 69.2%
- 3
Seed1.8 65.1%
- 4
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.2%
- 5
Seed1.5-VL 60%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 50.7%
- 2 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 49.7%
- 3
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 49.5%
- 4
InternVL2-8B 48.7%
- 5
InternVL2-4B 44.1%
- 6 LongVA-7B 43.6%
- 7 MiniCPM-V-2_6 39.1%
Source: Official OVBench leaderboard
- 1
Seed2.1 Pro 70%
- 2
Seed2.0 Pro 69.2%
- 3
Seed1.8 65.1%
- 4
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.2%
- 5
Seed1.5-VL 60%
- 6
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 50.7%
- 7 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 49.7%
- 8
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 49.5%
- 9
InternVL2-8B 48.7%
- 10
InternVL2-4B 44.1%
- 11 LongVA-7B 43.6%
- 12 MiniCPM-V-2_6 39.1%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official OVBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 70% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 69.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 65.1% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 63.2% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 60% | May 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 50.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 49.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 49.5% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 48.7% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 44.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | LongVA-7B | 43.6% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 39.1% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 70% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 69.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 65.1% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 63.2% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 60% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 50.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 49.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 49.5% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 48.7% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 44.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | LongVA-7B | 43.6% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 39.1% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 15 entries, 7 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2024 Number one over time 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official OVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official OVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in June 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | 70 | OVBench | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 63.2 | OVBench | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 65.1 | OVBench | |
| May 12, 2025 | 60 | OVBench |
4 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 70 | OVBench (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 65.1 | OVBench (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 69.2 | OVBench (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 60 | OVBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 59.6 | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%