Benchmark Almanac

PopQA

Tulu 3 405B 55.5% leads since November 2024
Fading

Models answer about 14k entity questions built from Wikidata, spread from popular to rare entities. Scored by whether the answer matches a gold alias.

Built to study when retrieval helps long-tail knowledge. Ai2 reports it in Tulu 3 and Olmo cards.

Released
December 2022
Kind
Trivia and open questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
December 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
December 2025

In the authors’ words

Despite their impressive performance on diverse tasks, large language models (LMs) still struggle with tasks requiring rich world knowledge, implying the limitations of relying solely on their parameters to encode a wealth of world knowledge. This paper aims to understand LMs' strengths and limitations in memorizing factual knowledge, by conducting large-scale knowledge probing experiments of 10 models and 4 augmentation methods on PopQA, our new open-domain QA dataset with 14k questions. We find that LMs struggle with less popular factual knowledge, and that scaling fails to appreciably improve memorization of factual knowledge in the long tail. We then show that retrieval-augmented LMs largely outperform orders of magnitude larger LMs, while unassisted LMs remain competitive in questions about high-popularity entities. Based on those findings, we devise a simple, yet effective, method for powerful and efficient retrieval-augmented LMs, which retrieves non-parametric memories only when necessary. Experimental results show that this significantly improves models' performance while reducing the inference costs.

Abstract of When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories (arXiv:2212.10511, CC0)
7
Models scored in lab cards
7
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
5
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Tulu 3 405B leads with 55.5% among models released by December 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Tulu 3 405B 55.5%
  2. 2 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 37.5%
  3. 3 Olmo 3 32B Think 31.9%
  4. 4 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 30.9%
  5. 5 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct 28%
  6. 6 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 26.2%
  7. 7 OLMo 2 1B Instruct 12.9%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Tulu 3 405B 55.5% Jan 2025 Lab model card
2 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 37.5% Mar 2025 Lab model card
3 Olmo 3 32B Think 31.9% Nov 2025 Lab model card
4 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 30.9% Dec 2025 Lab model card
5 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct 28% Feb 2025 Lab model card
6 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 26.2% Apr 2025 Lab model card
7 OLMo 2 1B Instruct 12.9% Apr 2025 Lab model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Ai2
Lab claims Not tested since Dec 2025
Tulu 3 405B 55.5%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Tulu 3 405B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Tulu 3 405B

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Ai2
IBM
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 12, 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 30.9 PopQA
Nov 20, 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think 31.9 PopQA
Apr 29, 2025 OLMo 2 1B Instruct 12.9 PopQA
Apr 16, 2025 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 26.2 PopQA
Mar 13, 2025 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 37.5 PopQA
Feb 26, 2025 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct 28 PopQA
Jan 30, 2025 Tulu 3 405B 55.5 PopQA (3 shot)

5 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Dec 15, 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think technical report 31.9 PopQA, Final Think 3.0 column (Table 14) Capabilities
Dec 15, 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think technical report 30.9 PopQA (Tables 1 and 14) Capabilities
Oct 8, 2025 OLMo 2 1B Instruct technical report 12.9 PQA, PopQA (Table 7, Table 23) Capabilities
Dec 31, 2024 OLMo 2 32B Instruct technical report 37.5 PopQA, 15-shot (Tables 7 and 16) Capabilities
Nov 22, 2024 Tulu 3 405B technical report 55.5 PopQA (3 shot), RLVR (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Knowledge

All 121 in Knowledge
  • MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects. Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
  • SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy. Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
  • WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1. Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
  • BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly. Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
  • KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry. Solar Pro 4 79.2%
  • HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed. Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%