Q-Bench-Video
Models judge the quality of natural, AI-generated and computer-graphics videos through yes-or-no, what-how, open-ended and pairwise comparison questions.
CVPR 2025 paper. A video sibling of the image test Q-Bench, not a new version of it. Open-ended answers are judged by an LLM.
- Released
- September 2024
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-4o mini #177 on the capability index
- Last model added
- July 2024
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
With the rising interest in research on Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) for video understanding, many studies have emphasized general video comprehension capabilities, neglecting the systematic exploration into video quality understanding. To address this oversight, we introduce Q-Bench-Video in this paper, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LMMs' proficiency in discerning video quality. a) To ensure video source diversity, Q-Bench-Video encompasses videos from natural scenes, AI-generated Content (AIGC), and Computer Graphics (CG). b) Building on the traditional multiple-choice questions format with the Yes-or-No and What-How categories, we include Open-ended questions to better evaluate complex scenarios. Additionally, we incorporate the video pair quality comparison question to enhance comprehensiveness. c) Beyond the traditional Technical, Aesthetic, and Temporal distortions, we have expanded our evaluation aspects to include the dimension of AIGC distortions, which addresses the increasing demand for video generation. Finally, we collect a total of 2,378 question-answer pairs and test them on 12 open-source & 5 proprietary LMMs. Our findings indicate that while LMMs have a foundational understanding of video quality, their performance remains incomplete and imprecise, with a notable discrepancy compared to human performance. Through Q-Bench-Video, we seek to catalyze community interest, stimulate further research, and unlock the untapped potential of LMMs to close the gap in video quality understanding.
GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 58.7%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-4o mini, at 52.2%.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 58.7 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 58.6 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 56.8 Gemini 1.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 56.4 GPT-4 Turbo (snapshot unspecified)
- 52.4 mPLUG-Owl3 (Qwen2-7B)
- 52.2 GPT-4o mini
- 51.7 LLaVA-OneVision (Qwen2-7B)
- 51.1 InternVL-Chat (Vicuna-7B)
- 50.4 PLLaVA (Mistral-7B)
- 49.4 VILA1.5 (LLaMA3-8B)
- 48.7 LLaVA-Next-Video (Mistral-7B)
- 47.5 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b
- 45.6 LLaVA-v1.5 (Vicuna-v1.5-13B)
- 43.5 Video-LLaVA (Vicuna-v1.5-7B)
- 43.4
mPLUG-Owl2
- 40.6 VideoChat2 (Mistral-7B)
- 35.4 ST-LLM (Vicuna-v1.1-7B)
- 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 58.7%
- 2 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 58.6%
- 3 Gemini 1.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 56.8%
- 4 GPT-4 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 56.4%
- 5 mPLUG-Owl3 (Qwen2-7B) 52.4%
- 6 GPT-4o mini 52.2%
- 7 LLaVA-OneVision (Qwen2-7B) 51.7%
- 8 InternVL-Chat (Vicuna-7B) 51.1%
- 9 PLLaVA (Mistral-7B) 50.4%
- 10 VILA1.5 (LLaMA3-8B) 49.4%
- 11 LLaVA-Next-Video (Mistral-7B) 48.7%
- 12 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 47.5%
- 13 LLaVA-v1.5 (Vicuna-v1.5-13B) 45.6%
- 14 Video-LLaVA (Vicuna-v1.5-7B) 43.5%
- 15
mPLUG-Owl2 43.4%
- 16 VideoChat2 (Mistral-7B) 40.6%
- 17 ST-LLM (Vicuna-v1.1-7B) 35.4%
Source: Official Q-Bench-Video leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 58.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 58.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | Gemini 1.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 56.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | GPT-4 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) | 56.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | mPLUG-Owl3 (Qwen2-7B) | 52.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | GPT-4o mini | 52.2% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | LLaVA-OneVision (Qwen2-7B) | 51.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | InternVL-Chat (Vicuna-7B) | 51.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | PLLaVA (Mistral-7B) | 50.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | VILA1.5 (LLaMA3-8B) | 49.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | LLaVA-Next-Video (Mistral-7B) | 48.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | llava-v1.6-mistral-7b | 47.5% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | LLaVA-v1.5 (Vicuna-v1.5-13B) | 45.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | Video-LLaVA (Vicuna-v1.5-7B) | 43.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | | 43.4% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | VideoChat2 (Mistral-7B) | 40.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | ST-LLM (Vicuna-v1.1-7B) | 35.4% | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Q-Bench-Video leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Q-Bench-Video leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%