Benchmark Almanac

Q-Bench-Video

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 58.7% tops its leaderboard GPT-4o mini 52.2% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models judge the quality of natural, AI-generated and computer-graphics videos through yes-or-no, what-how, open-ended and pairwise comparison questions.

CVPR 2025 paper. A video sibling of the image test Q-Bench, not a new version of it. Open-ended answers are judged by an LLM.

Released
September 2024
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-4o mini #177 on the capability index
Last model added
July 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

With the rising interest in research on Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) for video understanding, many studies have emphasized general video comprehension capabilities, neglecting the systematic exploration into video quality understanding. To address this oversight, we introduce Q-Bench-Video in this paper, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LMMs' proficiency in discerning video quality. a) To ensure video source diversity, Q-Bench-Video encompasses videos from natural scenes, AI-generated Content (AIGC), and Computer Graphics (CG). b) Building on the traditional multiple-choice questions format with the Yes-or-No and What-How categories, we include Open-ended questions to better evaluate complex scenarios. Additionally, we incorporate the video pair quality comparison question to enhance comprehensiveness. c) Beyond the traditional Technical, Aesthetic, and Temporal distortions, we have expanded our evaluation aspects to include the dimension of AIGC distortions, which addresses the increasing demand for video generation. Finally, we collect a total of 2,378 question-answer pairs and test them on 12 open-source & 5 proprietary LMMs. Our findings indicate that while LMMs have a foundational understanding of video quality, their performance remains incomplete and imprecise, with a notable discrepancy compared to human performance. Through Q-Bench-Video, we seek to catalyze community interest, stimulate further research, and unlock the untapped potential of LMMs to close the gap in video quality understanding.

Abstract of Q-Bench-Video: Benchmarking the Video Quality Understanding of LMMs (arXiv:2409.20063, CC0)
17
Entries on its own leaderboard, 3 models we track

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 58.7%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-4o mini, at 52.2%.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 58.7%
  2. 2 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 58.6%
  3. 3 Gemini 1.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 56.8%
  4. 4 GPT-4 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 56.4%
  5. 5 mPLUG-Owl3 (Qwen2-7B) 52.4%
  6. 6 GPT-4o mini 52.2%
  7. 7 LLaVA-OneVision (Qwen2-7B) 51.7%
  8. 8 InternVL-Chat (Vicuna-7B) 51.1%
  9. 9 PLLaVA (Mistral-7B) 50.4%
  10. 10 VILA1.5 (LLaMA3-8B) 49.4%
  11. 11 LLaVA-Next-Video (Mistral-7B) 48.7%
  12. 12 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 47.5%
  13. 13 LLaVA-v1.5 (Vicuna-v1.5-13B) 45.6%
  14. 14 Video-LLaVA (Vicuna-v1.5-7B) 43.5%
  15. 15 mPLUG-Owl2 43.4%
  16. 16 VideoChat2 (Mistral-7B) 40.6%
  17. 17 ST-LLM (Vicuna-v1.1-7B) 35.4%

Source: Official Q-Bench-Video leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 58.7% Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 58.6% Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 1.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 56.8% Official leaderboard
4 GPT-4 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 56.4% Official leaderboard
5 mPLUG-Owl3 (Qwen2-7B) 52.4% Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4o mini 52.2% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
7 LLaVA-OneVision (Qwen2-7B) 51.7% Official leaderboard
8 InternVL-Chat (Vicuna-7B) 51.1% Official leaderboard
9 PLLaVA (Mistral-7B) 50.4% Official leaderboard
10 VILA1.5 (LLaMA3-8B) 49.4% Official leaderboard
11 LLaVA-Next-Video (Mistral-7B) 48.7% Official leaderboard
12 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 47.5% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
13 LLaVA-v1.5 (Vicuna-v1.5-13B) 45.6% Official leaderboard
14 Video-LLaVA (Vicuna-v1.5-7B) 43.5% Official leaderboard
15 mPLUG-Owl2 43.4% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
16 VideoChat2 (Mistral-7B) 40.6% Official leaderboard
17 ST-LLM (Vicuna-v1.1-7B) 35.4% Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2024
GPT-4o mini 52.2%

Source: Official Q-Bench-Video leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4o mini llava-v1.6-mistral-7b mPLUG-Owl2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4o mini mPLUG-Owl2

Source: Official Q-Bench-Video leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%