Benchmark Almanac

RACE

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 94.2% leads since August 2025
Only in system cards

Models answer reading comprehension questions from Chinese middle and high school English exams. Reported here without a subset split.

Use race-m or race-h when a report gives the middle or high school subset.

Released
April 2017
Kind
Reading comprehension
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Llama 3.1-405B #162 on the capability index
Last in a system card
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026

In the authors’ words

We present RACE, a new dataset for benchmark evaluation of methods in the reading comprehension task. Collected from the English exams for middle and high school Chinese students in the age range between 12 to 18, RACE consists of near 28,000 passages and near 100,000 questions generated by human experts (English instructors), and covers a variety of topics which are carefully designed for evaluating the students' ability in understanding and reasoning. In particular, the proportion of questions that requires reasoning is much larger in RACE than that in other benchmark datasets for reading comprehension, and there is a significant gap between the performance of the state-of-the-art models (43%) and the ceiling human performance (95%). We hope this new dataset can serve as a valuable resource for research and evaluation in machine comprehension. The dataset is freely available at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~glai1/data/race/ and the code is available at https://github.com/qizhex/RACE_AR_baselines.

Abstract of RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinations (arXiv:1704.04683, CC0)
8
Models scored in lab cards
8
System cards report it, from 3 labs

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 94.2%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 94.2%
  2. 2 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 92.2%
  3. 3 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 91.4%
  4. 4 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base 88%
  5. 5 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 87.8%
  6. 6 Llama 3.1-70B 59%
  7. 7 Llama 3.1-405B 58.1%
  8. 8 Llama 3.1-8B 54.3%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 94.2% Aug 2025 Lab model card
2 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 92.2% Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 91.4% Oct 2026 Lab model card
4 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base 88% Dec 2025 Lab model card
5 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 87.8% Oct 2026 Lab model card
6 Llama 3.1-70B 59% Nov 2024 Lab model card
7 Llama 3.1-405B 58.1% Nov 2024 Lab model card
8 Llama 3.1-8B 54.3% Nov 2024 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Meta Shanghai AI Lab
Lab claims Passed 85% in Aug 2025, by InternVL3.5-241B-A28B

Source: Labs’ model cards

Shanghai AI Lab’s own number for InternVL3.5-241B-A28B passed 85% in August 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B Llama 3.1-70B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B Llama 3.1-70B

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

8 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base technical report 91.4 RACE, 0-shot acc, Table 6 Capabilities
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base technical report 87.8 RACE, 0-shot acc, Table 6 Capabilities
Jun 4, 2026 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base model card 92.2 RACE, 0-shot acc Capabilities
Dec 23, 2025 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Base technical report 88 RACE, 0-shot accuracy, base model Table 2 Capabilities
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 94.2 RACE-High, OpenCompass (Table 14) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-8B technical report 54.3 RACE, pretrained (Table 9) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-70B technical report 59 RACE, pretrained (Table 9) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-405B technical report 58.1 RACE, pretrained (Table 9) Capabilities

More in Knowledge

All 121 in Knowledge
  • MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects. Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
  • SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy. Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
  • WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1. Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
  • BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly. Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
  • KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry. Solar Pro 4 79.2%
  • HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed. Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%