Benchmark Almanac

SemComp-Bench

HunyuanVideo-1.5-I2V 37.8 tops its leaderboard Wan2.2-I2V-A14B 28.3 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Video generation models must complete an intended task outcome from a reference image while keeping the high-level semantics of the reference.

51 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.

Made by
FrameX AI
Released
August 2026
Kind
Video generation
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last model added
July 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce Semantic Task Completion Video Generation, an outcome-oriented video generation task. Under this formulation, success requires both achievement of the intended outcome and semantic grounding. Semantic grounding characterizes the correspondence between the reference image and the generated outcome in terms of high-level semantics relevant to the task. Evaluation focuses on the generated outcome and requires neither the presentation of a complete sequence of intermediate task steps nor conventional appearance consistency with the reference image. To support systematic evaluation, we construct SemComp-Data, an evaluation dataset covering six domains. Each instance comprises a reference image, a detailed instruction, a brief instruction, and an outcome-centric video clip. A scalable four-stage curation pipeline converts raw videos into standardized SemComp-Data instances. We further introduce SemComp-Bench, an evaluation protocol that uses a vision-language model (VLM) to answer structured binary questions. SemComp-Bench reports the OA Score and the GR Score for Outcome Achievement and Generation Reliability, respectively. Experiments on representative video generation models show that achieving intended outcomes while maintaining task-relevant semantic grounding in reference images remains challenging.

Abstract of SemComp-Bench: Benchmarking Semantic Task Completion in Video Generation (arXiv:2608.17426, CC0)
7
Entries on its own leaderboard, 2 models we track

HunyuanVideo-1.5-I2V tops the leaderboard with 37.8

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Wan2.2-I2V-A14B, at 28.3.

  1. 1 HunyuanVideo-1.5-I2V SemComp-Core; detailed instructions 37.8
  2. 2 Wan2.2-I2V-A14B SemComp-Core; detailed instructions 28.3
  3. 3 Wan2.2-TI2V-5B SemComp-Core; detailed instructions 23.3
  4. 4 SkyReels-V2-I2V-14B SemComp-Core; detailed instructions 22.8
  5. 5 Seedance 2.0 SemComp-Core; detailed instructions 20.0
  6. 6 CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V SemComp-Core; detailed instructions 14.4
  7. 7 Phantom-1.3B SemComp-Core; detailed instructions 3.90

Source: Official SemComp-Bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 HunyuanVideo-1.5-I2V 37.8 SemComp-Core; detailed instructions Official leaderboard
2 Wan2.2-I2V-A14B 28.3 SemComp-Core; detailed instructions Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Wan2.2-TI2V-5B 23.3 SemComp-Core; detailed instructions Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
4 SkyReels-V2-I2V-14B 22.8 SemComp-Core; detailed instructions Official leaderboard
5 Seedance 2.0 20.0 SemComp-Core; detailed instructions Official leaderboard
6 CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V 14.4 SemComp-Core; detailed instructions Official leaderboard
7 Phantom-1.3B 3.90 SemComp-Core; detailed instructions Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
24.0 26.0 28.0 24.0 26.0 28.0

Source: Official SemComp-Bench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%