Benchmark Almanac

TOMG-Bench

Llama3.1-8B (OpenMolIns-xlarge) 39.3% tops its leaderboard GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 18.6% leads the models we track
Intern-S2-397B 66.8% leads since September 2026
In use

Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties.

The paper was later retitled Speak-to-Structure (S^2-Bench).

Released
December 2024
Kind
Genomics and life sciences
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 #199 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential in natural language-driven molecule discovery. However, existing datasets and benchmarks for molecule-text alignment are predominantly built on one-to-one mappings, measuring LLMs' ability to retrieve a single, pre-defined answer, rather than their creative potential to generate diverse, yet equally valid, molecular candidates. To address this critical gap, we propose Speak-to-Structure (S^2-Bench), the first benchmark to evaluate LLMs in open-domain natural language-driven molecule generation. S^2-Bench is specifically designed for one-to-many relationships, challenging LLMs to exhibit genuine molecular understanding and open-ended generation capabilities. Our benchmark includes three key tasks: molecule editing (MolEdit), molecule optimization (MolOpt), and customized molecule generation (MolCustom), each probing a different aspect of molecule discovery. We also introduce OpenMolIns, a large-scale instruction tuning dataset that enables Llama3.1-8B to surpass the most powerful LLMs like GPT-4o and Claude-3.5 on S^2-Bench. Our comprehensive evaluation of 31 LLMs shifts the focus from simple pattern recall to realistic molecular design, paving the way for more capable LLMs in natural language-driven molecule discovery. Our codes and datasets are fully accessible through the Github Repository: https://github.com/phenixace/S2-TOMG-Bench and Huggingface Datasets: https://huggingface.co/datasets/phenixace/S2-TOMG-Bench.

Abstract of Speak-to-Structure: Evaluating LLMs in Open-domain Natural Language-Driven Molecule Generation (arXiv:2412.14642, CC0)
30
Entries on its own leaderboard, 5 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Llama3.1-8B (OpenMolIns-xlarge) tops the leaderboard with 39.3%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-3.5 Turbo, at 18.6%.

Intern-S2-397B leads with 66.8%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Llama3.1-8B (OpenMolIns-xlarge) 39.3%
  2. 2 Claude-3.5 35.9%
  3. 3 Gemini-1.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) 34.8%
  4. 4 GPT-4-turbo (snapshot unspecified) 34.2%
  5. 5 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 32.3%
  6. 6 Claude-3 30.5%
  7. 7 Llama3.1-8B (OpenMolIns-large) 27.2%
  8. 8 Galactica-125M (OpenMolIns-xlarge) 25.7%
  9. 9 Llama3-70B-Instruct (Int4) 23.9%
  10. 10 Galactica-125M (OpenMolIns-large) 23.4%
  11. 11 Galactica-125M (OpenMolIns-medium) 19.9%
  12. 12 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 18.6%
  13. 13 Galactica-125M (OpenMolIns-small) 15.2%
  14. 14 Gemma 3 12B 15%
  15. 15 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B 14.6%
  16. 16 Llama3.1-8B-Instruct 14.1%
  17. 17 Llama3-8B-Instruct 13.8%
  18. 18 chatglm-9B 13.1%
  19. 19 Galactica-125M (OpenMolIns-light) 13.1%
  20. 20 ChemDFM-v1.5-8B 12.1%
  21. 21 ChemLLM-20B 9.76%
  22. 22 Llama3.2-1B (OpenMolIns-large) 8.10%
  23. 23 yi-1.5-9B 7.32%
  24. 24 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 4.81%
  25. 25 BioT5-base 4.21%
  26. 26 MolT5-large 2.89%
  27. 27 Llama3.1-1B-Instruct 1.99%
  28. 28 MolT5-base 1.30%
  29. 29 MolT5-small 1.29%
  30. 30 Qwen2-7B-Instruct 0.15%

Source: Official TOMG-Bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Llama3.1-8B (OpenMolIns-xlarge) 39.3% Official leaderboard
2 Claude-3.5 35.9% Official leaderboard
3 Gemini-1.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) 34.8% Official leaderboard
4 GPT-4-turbo (snapshot unspecified) 34.2% Official leaderboard
5 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 32.3% Official leaderboard
6 Claude-3 30.5% Official leaderboard
7 Llama3.1-8B (OpenMolIns-large) 27.2% Official leaderboard
8 Galactica-125M (OpenMolIns-xlarge) 25.7% Official leaderboard
9 Llama3-70B-Instruct (Int4) 23.9% Official leaderboard
10 Galactica-125M (OpenMolIns-large) 23.4% Official leaderboard
11 Galactica-125M (OpenMolIns-medium) 19.9% Official leaderboard
12 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 18.6% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Galactica-125M (OpenMolIns-small) 15.2% Official leaderboard
14 Gemma 3 12B 15% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
15 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B 14.6% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Llama3.1-8B-Instruct 14.1% Official leaderboard
17 Llama3-8B-Instruct 13.8% Official leaderboard
18 chatglm-9B 13.1% Official leaderboard
19 Galactica-125M (OpenMolIns-light) 13.1% Official leaderboard
20 ChemDFM-v1.5-8B 12.1% Official leaderboard
21 ChemLLM-20B 9.76% Official leaderboard
22 Llama3.2-1B (OpenMolIns-large) 8.10% Official leaderboard
23 yi-1.5-9B 7.32% Official leaderboard
24 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 4.81% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
25 BioT5-base 4.21% Official leaderboard
26 MolT5-large 2.89% Official leaderboard
27 Llama3.1-1B-Instruct 1.99% Official leaderboard
28 MolT5-base 1.30% Official leaderboard
29 MolT5-small 1.29% Official leaderboard
30 Qwen2-7B-Instruct 0.15% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Intern-S2-397B 66.8% Sep 2026 Lab model card
2 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 18.6% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Gemma 3 12B 15% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
4 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B 14.6% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 4.81% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2-7B-Instruct 0.15% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2025

Source: Official TOMG-Bench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Intern-S2-397B GPT-3.5 Turbo Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Intern-S2-397B GPT-3.5 Turbo

Sources: Official TOMG-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Shanghai AI Lab
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 13, 2026 Intern-S2-397B 66.8 TOMG-Bench

More in Biology and chemistry

All 109 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
  • MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
  • ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%