Benchmark Almanac

τ-Voice

Pine Voice 1.0 87.3% tops its leaderboard GPT-Live-1 81.7% leads the models we track
GPT-Live-1 81.7% leads since September 2026
In use

Full-duplex voice agents handle real-time support calls in retail, airline and telecom with tools and a simulated caller. Scoring covers task completion and natural interaction.

Listed on taubench.com as the τ³-Voice board. Sierra also lists τ-i18n (six languages) and τ-Entity (entity capture over voice) as new voice evaluations.

Made by
Sierra
Released
March 2026
Kind
Speech recognition and translation
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Full-duplex voice agents–systems that listen and speak simultaneously–are rapidly moving from research to production. However, existing evaluations address conversational dynamics and task completion in isolation. We introduce τ-voice, a benchmark for evaluating voice agents on grounded tasks with real-world complexity: agents must navigate complex multi-turn conversations, adhere to domain policies, and interact with the environment. The framework extends τ²-bench into a novel voice agent benchmark combining verifiable completion of complex grounded tasks, full-duplex interaction, and realistic audio–enabling direct comparison between voice and text performance. A controllable and realistic voice user simulator provides diverse accents, realistic audio environments, and rich turn-taking dynamics; by decoupling simulation from wall-clock time, the user simulator can use the most capable LLM without real-time constraints. We evaluate task completion (pass@1) and voice interaction quality across 278 tasks: while GPT-5 (reasoning) achieves 85%, voice agents reach only 31–51% under clean conditions and 26–38% under realistic conditions with noise and diverse accents–retaining only 30–45% of text capability; qualitative analysis confirms 79–90% of failures stem from agent behavior, suggesting that observed failures primarily reflect agent behavior under our evaluation setup. τ-voice provides a reproducible testbed for measuring progress toward voice agents that are natural, conversational, and reliable.

Abstract of τ-Voice: Benchmarking Full-Duplex Voice Agents on Real-World Domains (arXiv:2603.13686, CC0)
16
Entries on its own leaderboard, 7 models we track
4
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs

Pine Voice 1.0 tops the leaderboard with 87.3%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-Live-1, at 81.7%.

GPT-Live-1 leads with 81.7%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Pine Voice 1.0 enabled 87.3%
  2. 2 phonic-1 high 83.7%
  3. 3 GPT-Live-1 backend: gpt-6 astra (medium) 81.7%
  4. 4 Ava Zero backend: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 (max) 80.4%
  5. 5 Pine Voice Preview enabled 75.4%
  6. 6 Grok Voice Think Fast 1.0 enabled 67.3%
  7. 7 Grok Voice 2.0 high 62.5%
  8. 8 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 53.7%
  9. 9 gemini-3.1-flash-live-preview-thinking-high high 43.9%
  10. 10 GPT-Realtime-2 xhigh 42.4%
  11. 11 grok-voice-fast-1.0 38.3%
  12. 12 GPT-Realtime-1.5 35.3%
  13. 13 Cascaded baseline 31.2%
  14. 14 gpt-realtime 30.4%
  15. 15 gemini-3.1-flash-live-preview-thinking-minimal minimal 28.6%
  16. 16 gemini-live-2.5-flash-native-audio 25.8%

Source: Official τ-Voice leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Pine Voice 1.0 87.3% enabled Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
2 phonic-1 83.7% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-Live-1 81.7% backend: gpt-6 astra (medium) Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Ava Zero 80.4% backend: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 (max) Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Pine Voice Preview 75.4% enabled Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Grok Voice Think Fast 1.0 67.3% enabled Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Grok Voice 2.0 62.5% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 53.7% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
9 gemini-3.1-flash-live-preview-thinking-high 43.9% high Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-Realtime-2 42.4% xhigh May 2026 Official leaderboard
11 grok-voice-fast-1.0 38.3% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-Realtime-1.5 35.3% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Cascaded baseline 31.2% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
14 gpt-realtime 30.4% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
15 gemini-3.1-flash-live-preview-thinking-minimal 28.6% minimal Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
16 gemini-live-2.5-flash-native-audio 25.8% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-Live-1 81.7% backend: gpt-6 astra (medium) Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Grok Voice 3.0 71.6% Oct 2026 Lab model card
3 Gemini 3.8 Live Extended Thinking 68.6% Sep 2026 Lab model card
4 Grok Voice Think Fast 1.0 67.3% enabled Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Grok Voice 2.0 62.5% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 53.7% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-Realtime-2 42.4% xhigh May 2026 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-Realtime-1.5 35.3% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
9 gpt-realtime 30.4% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

4 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in March 2026 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Qwen xAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2026
GPT-Live-1 81.7%
Lab claims 3 leaders

Sources: Official τ-Voice leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-Live-1 Grok Voice Think Fast 1.0 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus GPT-Realtime-1.5 gpt-realtime 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-Live-1 Grok Voice Think Fast 1.0

Sources: Official τ-Voice leaderboard and labs’ model cards

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

xAI
Google DeepMind
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 14, 2026 Grok Voice 3.0 71.6 τ-Voice
Sep 15, 2026 Gemini 3.8 Live Extended Thinking 68.6 Agentic Performance (τ-Voice), Artificial Analysis, High
Jul 29, 2026 Grok Voice 2.0 56.5 Agentic Performance τ-voice Bench (per Artificial Analysis)
Apr 23, 2026 Grok Voice Think Fast 1.0 67.3 τ-voice Leaderboard, Overall

2 lab claims next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Grok Voice 2.0 56.5% Agentic Performance τ-voice Bench (per Artificial Analysis) 62.5% Leaderboard, high −6.0 pts
Grok Voice Think Fast 1.0 67.3% τ-voice Leaderboard, Overall 67.3% Leaderboard, enabled Same

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%