TempCompass
Video models answer questions about temporal aspects of short clips, such as action order, speed, direction and attribute change, in several question formats.
Clips come in pairs that differ only in one temporal aspect, so single frames cannot answer them.
- Made by
- Peking University and Huawei Noah Ark Lab (Liu et al.)
- Released
- March 2024
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a launch post
- February 2026, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- March 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Recently, there is a surge in interest surrounding video large language models (Video LLMs). However, existing benchmarks fail to provide a comprehensive feedback on the temporal perception ability of Video LLMs. On the one hand, most of them are unable to distinguish between different temporal aspects (e.g., speed, direction) and thus cannot reflect the nuanced performance on these specific aspects. On the other hand, they are limited in the diversity of task formats (e.g., only multi-choice QA), which hinders the understanding of how temporal perception performance may vary across different types of tasks. Motivated by these two problems, we propose the TempCompass benchmark, which introduces a diversity of temporal aspects and task formats. To collect high-quality test data, we devise two novel strategies: (1) In video collection, we construct conflicting videos that share the same static content but differ in a specific temporal aspect, which prevents Video LLMs from leveraging single-frame bias or language priors. (2) To collect the task instructions, we propose a paradigm where humans first annotate meta-information for a video and then an LLM generates the instruction. We also design an LLM-based approach to automatically and accurately evaluate the responses from Video LLMs. Based on TempCompass, we comprehensively evaluate 8 state-of-the-art (SOTA) Video LLMs and 3 Image LLMs, and reveal the discerning fact that these models exhibit notably poor temporal perception ability. Our data will be available at https://github.com/llyx97/TempCompass.
Seed2.0 Pro leads with 89.6% among models released by February 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Keye-VL-1.5-8B leads with 75.5% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Seed2.0 Pro leads with 89.6%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Seed2.0 Pro 89.6%
- 2
Seed1.8 86.9%
- 3
Seed1.5-VL 83.7%
- 4
LongCat-Flash-Omni 82.2%
- 5
V-JEPA 2 76.9%
- 6
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 75.1%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 74.8%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1
Keye-VL-1.5-8B frames 64 75.5%
- 2 Aria frames 64 69.6%
- 3 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct frames 1fps 67.8%
- 4 MiniCPM-V-2_6 frames 64 66.3%
- 5
InternVL2-8B frames 8 66%
- 6 Reka Core frames - 64.3%
- 7
InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B frames 32 62.1%
- 8 TimeMarker frames 60.4%
- 9
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B frames 8 58.8%
- 10 LongVA-7B frames 32 57%
- 11 Qwen-VL-Chat frames 1 52.9%
- 12
LLaVA-v1.5-13B frames 1 51.3%
- 13 Video-LLaVA-7B frames 8 49.8%
Source: Official TempCompass leaderboard
- 89.6
Seed2.0 Pro
- 86.9
Seed1.8
- 83.7
Seed1.5-VL
- 82.2
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 76.9
V-JEPA 2
- 75.5
Keye-VL-1.5-8B
- 75.1
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking
- 74.8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 69.6 Aria
- 67.8 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
- 66.3 MiniCPM-V-2_6
- 66.0
InternVL2-8B
- 64.3 Reka Core
- 62.1
InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B
- 60.4 TimeMarker
- 58.8
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B
- 57.0 LongVA-7B
- 52.9 Qwen-VL-Chat
- 51.3
LLaVA-v1.5-13B
- 49.8 Video-LLaVA-7B
- 1
Seed2.0 Pro 89.6%
- 2
Seed1.8 86.9%
- 3
Seed1.5-VL 83.7%
- 4
LongCat-Flash-Omni 82.2%
- 5
V-JEPA 2 76.9%
- 6
Keye-VL-1.5-8B frames 64 75.5%
- 7
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 75.1%
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 74.8%
- 9 Aria frames 64 69.6%
- 10 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct frames 1fps 67.8%
- 11 MiniCPM-V-2_6 frames 64 66.3%
- 12
InternVL2-8B frames 8 66%
- 13 Reka Core frames - 64.3%
- 14
InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B frames 32 62.1%
- 15 TimeMarker frames 60.4%
- 16
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B frames 8 58.8%
- 17 LongVA-7B frames 32 57%
- 18 Qwen-VL-Chat frames 1 52.9%
- 19
LLaVA-v1.5-13B frames 1 51.3%
- 20 Video-LLaVA-7B frames 8 49.8%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official TempCompass leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 89.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 86.9% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 83.7% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 82.2% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 76.9% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 75.1% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 74.8% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 75.5% | frames 64 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Aria | 69.6% | frames 64 | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 67.8% | frames 1fps | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 66.3% | frames 64 | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 66% | frames 8 | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Reka Core | 64.3% | frames - | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 62.1% | frames 32 | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | TimeMarker | 60.4% | frames | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 58.8% | frames 8 | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | LongVA-7B | 57% | frames 32 | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 52.9% | frames 1 | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 51.3% | frames 1 | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Video-LLaVA-7B | 49.8% | frames 8 | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 89.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 86.9% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 83.7% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 82.2% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 76.9% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 75.5% | frames 64 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 75.1% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 74.8% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | Aria | 69.6% | frames 64 | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 67.8% | frames 1fps | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 66.3% | frames 64 | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 66% | frames 8 | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Reka Core | 64.3% | frames - | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 62.1% | frames 32 | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | TimeMarker | 60.4% | frames | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 58.8% | frames 8 | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | LongVA-7B | 57% | frames 32 | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 52.9% | frames 1 | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | | 51.3% | frames 1 | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | Video-LLaVA-7B | 49.8% | frames 8 | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 30 entries, 13 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in March 2024 7 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in March 2024 10 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official TempCompass leaderboard and labs’ model cards
ByteDance Seed’s own number for Seed1.8 passed 85% in December 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official TempCompass leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in February 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2026 | 89.6 | TempCompass | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 86.9 | TempCompass | |
| Nov 11, 2025 | 75.1 | TempCompass | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 82.2 | TempCompass | |
| Jun 11, 2025 | 76.9 | TempCompass (Video QA) | |
| May 12, 2025 | 83.7 | TempCompass | |
| Jan 28, 2025 | 74.8 | TempCompass_overall |
5 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 86.9 | TempCompass (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 89.6 | TempCompass (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 82.2 | TempCompass (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 83.7 | TempCompass, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 83.1 | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 74.8 | TempCompass Avg (Table 8) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%