Benchmark Almanac

TVBench

Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9% leads since August 2026
Aria 51% leads since October 2024
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9% leads since August 2026
In use

Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.

Released
October 2024
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large language models have demonstrated impressive performance when integrated with vision models even enabling video understanding. However, evaluating video models presents its own unique challenges, for which several benchmarks have been proposed. In this paper, we show that the currently most used video-language benchmarks can be solved without requiring much temporal reasoning. We identified three main issues in existing datasets: (i) static information from single frames is often sufficient to solve the tasks (ii) the text of the questions and candidate answers is overly informative, allowing models to answer correctly without relying on any visual input (iii) world knowledge alone can answer many of the questions, making the benchmarks a test of knowledge replication rather than video reasoning. In addition, we found that open-ended question-answering benchmarks for video understanding suffer from similar issues while the automatic evaluation process with LLMs is unreliable, making it an unsuitable alternative. As a solution, we propose TVBench, a novel open-source video multiple-choice question-answering benchmark, and demonstrate through extensive evaluations that it requires a high level of temporal understanding. Surprisingly, we find that most recent state-of-the-art video-language models perform similarly to random performance on TVBench, with only a few models such as Qwen2-VL, and Tarsier clearly surpassing this baseline.

Abstract of Lost in Time: A New Temporal Benchmark for VideoLLMs (arXiv:2410.07752, CC0)
7
Models scored in lab cards
7
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 81.9% among models released by August 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Aria leads with 51% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 81.9%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%
  2. 2 Seed2.1 Pro 80.5%
  3. 3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 80.4%
  4. 4 Qwen3.7-Plus 78.2%
  5. 5 Seed2.0 Pro 75%
  6. 6 Seed1.8 71.5%
  7. 7 Seed1.5-VL 63.6%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.1 Pro 80.5% Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 80.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.7-Plus 78.2% Jun 2026 Lab model card
5 Seed2.0 Pro 75% Feb 2026 Lab model card
6 Seed1.8 71.5% Dec 2025 Lab model card
7 Seed1.5-VL 63.6% May 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Aria 51% video Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 43.8% video Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
3 VideoLLAMA2-7B 42.9% video Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
4 mPLUG-Owl3-7B 42.2% video Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
5 ST-LLM 35.7% video Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Llama 3-70B 34.7% text only Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.1 Pro 80.5% Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 80.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.7-Plus 78.2% Jun 2026 Lab model card
5 Seed2.0 Pro 75% Feb 2026 Lab model card
6 Seed1.8 71.5% Dec 2025 Lab model card
7 Seed1.5-VL 63.6% May 2025 Lab model card
8 Aria 51% video Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 43.8% video Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
10 VideoLLAMA2-7B 42.9% video Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
11 mPLUG-Owl3-7B 42.2% video Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
12 ST-LLM 35.7% video Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Llama 3-70B 34.7% text only Apr 2024 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 24 entries, 6 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

6 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in October 2024 Number one over time 7 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Other labs ByteDance Seed Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Oct 2024
Aria 51%
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%

Sources: Official TVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.5-VL Aria Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct ST-LLM 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Seed2.0 Pro

Sources: Official TVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9 TVBench
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro 80.5 TVBench
Jun 1, 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 78.2 TVBench
Apr 28, 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 80.4 TVBench
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 75 TVBench
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 71.5 TVBench
May 12, 2025 Seed1.5-VL 63.6 TVBench

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 80.5 TVBench (Table 10) Capabilities
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 71.5 TVBench (Table 3) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 75 TVBench (Table 9) Capabilities
May 11, 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 63.6 TVBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 61.5 Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%