TVBench
Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
- Released
- October 2024
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large language models have demonstrated impressive performance when integrated with vision models even enabling video understanding. However, evaluating video models presents its own unique challenges, for which several benchmarks have been proposed. In this paper, we show that the currently most used video-language benchmarks can be solved without requiring much temporal reasoning. We identified three main issues in existing datasets: (i) static information from single frames is often sufficient to solve the tasks (ii) the text of the questions and candidate answers is overly informative, allowing models to answer correctly without relying on any visual input (iii) world knowledge alone can answer many of the questions, making the benchmarks a test of knowledge replication rather than video reasoning. In addition, we found that open-ended question-answering benchmarks for video understanding suffer from similar issues while the automatic evaluation process with LLMs is unreliable, making it an unsuitable alternative. As a solution, we propose TVBench, a novel open-source video multiple-choice question-answering benchmark, and demonstrate through extensive evaluations that it requires a high level of temporal understanding. Surprisingly, we find that most recent state-of-the-art video-language models perform similarly to random performance on TVBench, with only a few models such as Qwen2-VL, and Tarsier clearly surpassing this baseline.
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 81.9% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Aria leads with 51% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 81.9%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%
- 2
Seed2.1 Pro 80.5%
- 3
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 80.4%
- 4
Qwen3.7-Plus 78.2%
- 5
Seed2.0 Pro 75%
- 6
Seed1.8 71.5%
- 7
Seed1.5-VL 63.6%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 Aria video 51%
- 2 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct video 43.8%
- 3 VideoLLAMA2-7B video 42.9%
- 4
mPLUG-Owl3-7B video 42.2%
- 5 ST-LLM video 35.7%
- 6
Llama 3-70B text only 34.7%
Source: Official TVBench leaderboard
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%
- 2
Seed2.1 Pro 80.5%
- 3
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 80.4%
- 4
Qwen3.7-Plus 78.2%
- 5
Seed2.0 Pro 75%
- 6
Seed1.8 71.5%
- 7
Seed1.5-VL 63.6%
- 8 Aria video 51%
- 9 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct video 43.8%
- 10 VideoLLAMA2-7B video 42.9%
- 11
mPLUG-Owl3-7B video 42.2%
- 12 ST-LLM video 35.7%
- 13
Llama 3-70B text only 34.7%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official TVBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 81.9% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 80.5% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 80.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 78.2% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 75% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 71.5% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 63.6% | May 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aria | 51% | video | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 43.8% | video | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 42.9% | video | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 42.2% | video | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | ST-LLM | 35.7% | video | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 34.7% | text only | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 81.9% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 80.5% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 80.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 78.2% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 75% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 71.5% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 63.6% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Aria | 51% | video | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 43.8% | video | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 42.9% | video | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 42.2% | video | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | ST-LLM | 35.7% | video | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 34.7% | text only | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 24 entries, 6 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
6 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in October 2024 Number one over time 7 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official TVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official TVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | 81.9 | TVBench | |
| Jun 23, 2026 | 80.5 | TVBench | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 78.2 | TVBench | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 80.4 | TVBench | |
| Feb 14, 2026 | 75 | TVBench | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 71.5 | TVBench | |
| May 12, 2025 | 63.6 | TVBench |
4 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 80.5 | TVBench (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 71.5 | TVBench (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 75 | TVBench (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 63.6 | TVBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 61.5 | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%