VCR-Bench
Video models answer 1,034 questions on 859 videos, and graders score both the final answer and each tagged chain-of-thought step against human rationales.
At release o1 scored a 62.8% CoT score and 56.7% accuracy.
- Made by
- Qi et al. (VCR-Bench team)
- Released
- April 2025
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Short answer
- Strongest model tested
- o1 #117 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- December 2025, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- March 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
The advancement of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly enhanced the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and large vision-language models (LVLMs). However, a rigorous evaluation framework for video CoT reasoning remains absent. Current video benchmarks fail to adequately assess the reasoning process and expose whether failures stem from deficiencies in perception or reasoning capabilities. Therefore, we introduce VCR-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to comprehensively evaluate LVLMs' Video Chain-of-Thought Reasoning capabilities. VCR-Bench comprises 859 videos spanning a variety of video content and durations, along with 1,034 high-quality question-answer pairs. Each pair is manually annotated with a stepwise CoT rationale, where every step is tagged to indicate its association with the perception or reasoning capabilities. Furthermore, we design seven distinct task dimensions and propose the CoT score to assess the entire CoT process based on the stepwise tagged CoT rationals. Extensive experiments on VCR-Bench highlight substantial limitations in current LVLMs. Even the top-performing model, o1, only achieves a 62.8% CoT score and an 56.7% accuracy, while most models score below 40%. Experiments show most models score lower on perception than reasoning steps, revealing LVLMs' key bottleneck in temporal-spatial information processing for complex video reasoning. A robust positive correlation between the CoT score and accuracy confirms the validity of our evaluation framework and underscores the critical role of CoT reasoning in solving complex video reasoning tasks. We hope VCR-Bench to serve as a standardized evaluation framework and expose the actual drawbacks in complex video reasoning task.
o1 leads with 56.7% among models released by January 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
Seed1.8 leads with 59.8%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in January 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 56.7 o1
- 51.7 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 46.9 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 44.0 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 41.0 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
- 38.2 Aria-25B
- 37.9
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 36.6 LLaVA-Video-72B
- 36.4 LLaVA-OneVision 72B
- 33.0 InternVideo2.5-8B
- 32.5 LLaVA-Video-7B
- 32.5 VideoLLAMA3-7B
- 30.9
InternVL2_5-78B
- 30.7
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
- 30.4
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 26.9 MiniCPM-o2.6-8B
- 23.9
InternVL2.5-8B
- 7.30
mPLUG-Owl3-7B
- 4.90 Llama-3.2-11B-Vision
- 1 o1 56.7%
- 2 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 51.7%
- 3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 46.9%
- 4 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 44%
- 5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 41%
- 6 Aria-25B 38.2%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 37.9%
- 8 LLaVA-Video-72B 36.6%
- 9 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 36.4%
- 10 InternVideo2.5-8B 33%
- 11 LLaVA-Video-7B 32.5%
- 12 VideoLLAMA3-7B 32.5%
- 13
InternVL2_5-78B 30.9%
- 14
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 30.7%
- 15
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 30.4%
- 16 MiniCPM-o2.6-8B 26.9%
- 17
InternVL2.5-8B 23.9%
- 18
mPLUG-Owl3-7B 7.30%
- 19 Llama-3.2-11B-Vision 4.90%
Source: Official VCR-Bench leaderboard
- 1
Seed1.8 59.8%
- 2 o1 56.7%
- 3
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 37.9%
- 4 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 36.4%
- 5 VideoLLAMA3-7B 32.5%
- 6
InternVL2_5-78B 30.9%
- 7
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 30.7%
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 30.4%
- 9
InternVL2.5-8B 23.9%
- 10
mPLUG-Owl3-7B 7.30%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official VCR-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | o1 | 56.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 51.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 46.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 44% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) | 41% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | Aria-25B | 38.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | | 37.9% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | LLaVA-Video-72B | 36.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | LLaVA-OneVision 72B | 36.4% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | InternVideo2.5-8B | 33% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | LLaVA-Video-7B | 32.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 32.5% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 30.9% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 30.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 30.4% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | MiniCPM-o2.6-8B | 26.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | | 23.9% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 7.30% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Llama-3.2-11B-Vision | 4.90% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 59.8% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | o1 | 56.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 37.9% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | LLaVA-OneVision 72B | 36.4% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 32.5% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 30.9% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 30.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 30.4% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 23.9% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 7.30% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official VCR-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official VCR-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | 59.8 | VCRBench |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 59.8 | VCRBench (Table 3) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%