Benchmark Almanac

VCR-Bench

o1 56.7% leads since April 2025
Seed1.8 59.8% leads since December 2025
Fading

Video models answer 1,034 questions on 859 videos, and graders score both the final answer and each tagged chain-of-thought step against human rationales.

At release o1 scored a 62.8% CoT score and 56.7% accuracy.

Released
April 2025
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Short answer
Strongest model tested
o1 #117 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
December 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

The advancement of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly enhanced the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and large vision-language models (LVLMs). However, a rigorous evaluation framework for video CoT reasoning remains absent. Current video benchmarks fail to adequately assess the reasoning process and expose whether failures stem from deficiencies in perception or reasoning capabilities. Therefore, we introduce VCR-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to comprehensively evaluate LVLMs' Video Chain-of-Thought Reasoning capabilities. VCR-Bench comprises 859 videos spanning a variety of video content and durations, along with 1,034 high-quality question-answer pairs. Each pair is manually annotated with a stepwise CoT rationale, where every step is tagged to indicate its association with the perception or reasoning capabilities. Furthermore, we design seven distinct task dimensions and propose the CoT score to assess the entire CoT process based on the stepwise tagged CoT rationals. Extensive experiments on VCR-Bench highlight substantial limitations in current LVLMs. Even the top-performing model, o1, only achieves a 62.8% CoT score and an 56.7% accuracy, while most models score below 40%. Experiments show most models score lower on perception than reasoning steps, revealing LVLMs' key bottleneck in temporal-spatial information processing for complex video reasoning. A robust positive correlation between the CoT score and accuracy confirms the validity of our evaluation framework and underscores the critical role of CoT reasoning in solving complex video reasoning tasks. We hope VCR-Bench to serve as a standardized evaluation framework and expose the actual drawbacks in complex video reasoning task.

Abstract of VCR-Bench: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Video Chain-of-Thought Reasoning (arXiv:2504.07956, CC0)
19
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

o1 leads with 56.7% among models released by January 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Seed1.8 leads with 59.8%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in January 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 o1 56.7%
  2. 2 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 51.7%
  3. 3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 46.9%
  4. 4 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 44%
  5. 5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 41%
  6. 6 Aria-25B 38.2%
  7. 7 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 37.9%
  8. 8 LLaVA-Video-72B 36.6%
  9. 9 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 36.4%
  10. 10 InternVideo2.5-8B 33%
  11. 11 LLaVA-Video-7B 32.5%
  12. 12 VideoLLAMA3-7B 32.5%
  13. 13 InternVL2_5-78B 30.9%
  14. 14 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 30.7%
  15. 15 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 30.4%
  16. 16 MiniCPM-o2.6-8B 26.9%
  17. 17 InternVL2.5-8B 23.9%
  18. 18 mPLUG-Owl3-7B 7.30%
  19. 19 Llama-3.2-11B-Vision 4.90%

Source: Official VCR-Bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 o1 56.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 51.7% Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 46.9% Official leaderboard
4 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 44% Official leaderboard
5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 41% Official leaderboard
6 Aria-25B 38.2% Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 37.9% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
8 LLaVA-Video-72B 36.6% Official leaderboard
9 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 36.4% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
10 InternVideo2.5-8B 33% Official leaderboard
11 LLaVA-Video-7B 32.5% Official leaderboard
12 VideoLLAMA3-7B 32.5% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
13 InternVL2_5-78B 30.9% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
14 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 30.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 30.4% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
16 MiniCPM-o2.6-8B 26.9% Official leaderboard
17 InternVL2.5-8B 23.9% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
18 mPLUG-Owl3-7B 7.30% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Llama-3.2-11B-Vision 4.90% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed1.8 59.8% Dec 2025 Lab model card
2 o1 56.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 37.9% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
4 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 36.4% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
5 VideoLLAMA3-7B 32.5% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
6 InternVL2_5-78B 30.9% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
7 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 30.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 30.4% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
9 InternVL2.5-8B 23.9% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
10 mPLUG-Owl3-7B 7.30% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2025
o1 56.7%

Source: Official VCR-Bench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.8 o1 LLaVA-OneVision 72B VideoLLAMA3-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.8 LLaVA-OneVision 72B

Sources: Official VCR-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 59.8 VCRBench

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 59.8 VCRBench (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%