Video Reality Test
Vision-language models and humans judge whether ASMR videos with tight audio and visual coupling are real or AI-generated. It tests perceptual realism detection.
65 HF paper upvotes. Also used to see whether generated videos can fool the models.
- Made by
- Video Reality Test authors
- Released
- December 2025
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
- Last model added
- November 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
With AI-generated videos increasingly indistinguishable from reality, current benchmarks primarily focus on broad semantic alignment and basic physical consistency, offering limited discriminative power for evaluating them. To address this, we introduce VideoASMR-Bench, a benchmark based on Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR) videos that emphasizes fine-grained audio-visual perception and sensory immersion. This benchmark aims to answer two key questions: (i) Are today's video understanding models (VLMs) sensitive enough to detect AI-generated ASMR videos by recognizing minor visual, physical, or auditory artifacts? (ii) Can today's video generation models (VGMs) produce convincing ASMR videos with immersive experiences? This benchmark comprises a diverse set of 1,500 high-quality real ASMR videos curated from social media, alongside 2,235 synthetic counterparts generated by nine VGMs. Additionally, we open-source an extensible suite of prompts and reference images, enabling the benchmark to scale dynamically with future video models. Moreover, we design an automatic understanding-generation evaluation framework between VGMs and VLMs, where VGMs aim to produce realistic fake videos to fool the VLMs, while the VLMs seek to detect them, forming an adversarial game between the two parties. Our evaluation on VideoASMR-Bench reveals that even state-of-the-art VLMs, such as Gemini-3-Pro, fail to reliably detect AI-generated ASMR videos. Meanwhile, current frontier video generation models can produce ASMR videos that are difficult for VLMs to distinguish from real ones, while humans can still identify them relatively easily.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 76.3% among models released by November 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in November 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 76.3%
- 2 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) audio enabled 68.4%
- 3 GPT-5 (Preview) 67.1%
- 4 Qwen3-VL-8B 63.9%
- 5 GLM-4.5V 63.6%
- 6 Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) audio enabled 63.1%
- 7
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 61.9%
- 8 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 60.2%
- 9
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 58.9%
- 10 GPT-4o mini 57.3%
- 11 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B 54.9%
Source: Official Video Reality Test leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 76.3% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 68.4% | audio enabled | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5 (Preview) | 67.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Qwen3-VL-8B | 63.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | GLM-4.5V | 63.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 63.1% | audio enabled | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 61.9% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 60.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | | 58.9% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-4o mini | 57.3% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B | 54.9% | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Video Reality Test leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Video Reality Test leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%