Benchmark Almanac

WebVoyager

Fara1.5-27B 89.3% leads since May 2026
Fading

Agents complete user tasks on 15 popular real websites by browsing from screenshots and page text. A GPT-4V judge grades whether each task succeeded.

Tasks run on live websites, so pages and answers change over time. The Nemotron 3.5 Super VL card marks its run as offline.

Released
January 2024
Kind
Web browsing
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
October 2026, dropped after it saturated
Last model added
October 2026

In the authors’ words

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led to a new era marked by the development of autonomous applications in real-world scenarios, which drives innovation in creating advanced web agents. Existing web agents typically only handle one input modality and are evaluated only in simplified web simulators or static web snapshots, greatly limiting their applicability in real-world scenarios. To bridge this gap, we introduce WebVoyager, an innovative Large Multimodal Model (LMM) powered web agent that can complete user instructions end-to-end by interacting with real-world websites. Moreover, we establish a new benchmark by compiling real-world tasks from 15 popular websites and introduce an automatic evaluation protocol leveraging multimodal understanding abilities of GPT-4V to evaluate open-ended web agents. We show that WebVoyager achieves a 59.1% task success rate on our benchmark, significantly surpassing the performance of both GPT-4 (All Tools) and the WebVoyager (text-only) setups, underscoring the exceptional capability of WebVoyager. The proposed automatic evaluation metric achieves 85.3% agreement with human judgment, indicating its effectiveness in providing reliable and accurate assessments of web agents.

Abstract of WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Models (arXiv:2401.13919, CC0)
12
Models scored in lab cards
12
Launch posts list it, from 7 labs
8
System cards report it, from 5 labs

Fara1.5-27B leads with 89.3%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Fara1.5-27B 89.3%
  2. 2 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 88.9%
  3. 3 GLM-5V-Turbo 88.5%
  4. 4 Seed1.5-VL 87.2%
  5. 5 OpenAI Computer-Using Agent (CUA) 87%
  6. 6 UI-TARS-1.5 84.8%
  7. 7 GLM-4.5V 84.4%
  8. 8 GLM-4.6V 81%
  9. 9 MolmoWeb 8B 78.2%
  10. 10 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 77.7%
  11. 11 Fara-7B 73.5%
  12. 12 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 69%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Fara1.5-27B 89.3% May 2026 Lab model card
2 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 88.9% Oct 2025 Lab model card
3 GLM-5V-Turbo 88.5% Apr 2026 Lab model card
4 Seed1.5-VL 87.2% May 2025 Lab model card
5 OpenAI Computer-Using Agent (CUA) 87% Jan 2025 Lab model card
6 UI-TARS-1.5 84.8% Apr 2025 Lab model card
7 GLM-4.5V 84.4% Aug 2025 Lab model card
8 GLM-4.6V 81% Dec 2025 Lab model card
9 MolmoWeb 8B 78.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
10 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 77.7% Oct 2026 Lab model card
11 Fara-7B 73.5% Nov 2025 Lab model card
12 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 69% Jul 2025 Lab model card

4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in January 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI ByteDance Seed Google DeepMind Microsoft
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jan 2025, by OpenAI Computer-Using Agent (CUA)
Fara1.5-27B 89.3%

Source: Labs’ model cards

OpenAI’s own number for OpenAI Computer-Using Agent (CUA) passed 85% in January 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Fara1.5-27B Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Seed1.5-VL 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Fara1.5-27B Seed1.5-VL

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in October 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
ByteDance Seed
Z.ai
Google DeepMind
Microsoft
Ai2
NVIDIA
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 77.7 WebVoyager [offline]
May 21, 2026 Fara1.5-27B 89.3 WebVoyager
Apr 1, 2026 GLM-5V-Turbo 88.5 WebVoyager 88.5
Mar 24, 2026 MolmoWeb 8B 78.2 WebVoyager (pass@1)
Dec 8, 2025 GLM-4.6V 81 WebVoyager
Nov 24, 2025 Fara-7B 73.5 WebVoyager
Oct 7, 2025 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 88.9 WebVoyager, self-reported (Browserbase 79.9)
Aug 11, 2025 GLM-4.5V 84.4 WebVoyagerSom
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 69 WebVoyageSom
May 12, 2025 Seed1.5-VL 87.2 WebVoyager
Apr 16, 2025 UI-TARS-1.5 84.8 WebVoyager
Jan 23, 2025 OpenAI Computer-Using Agent (CUA) 87 WebVoyager (browser use)

8 system cards report it, from 5 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 18, 2026 Fara1.5-27B technical report 89.3 WebVoyager task success, mean of 3 runs, 95% CI 1.8 (Tables 3 and 7) Capabilities
Apr 9, 2026 MolmoWeb 8B technical report 78.2 WebVoyager, 100 steps, single rollout, mean of 3 to 5 runs (Table 4). Pass@4 with LLM-judge selection 94.7 (Figure 6) Capabilities
Jan 1, 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 81 WebVoyager Som, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Nov 24, 2025 Fara-7B technical report 73.5 WebVoyager success rate, mean of 3 runs, 73.5 ± 1.0 (Table 9, Table 19). About 48 stale tasks removed and 50 re-dated Capabilities
Oct 7, 2025 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model card 88.9 WebVoyager, Official Leaderboard, 79.9 measured by Browserbase (results table, p.3) Capabilities
Aug 13, 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 84.4 WebVoyager Som, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 69 WebVoyager Som, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
May 11, 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 87.2 WebVoyager, thinking (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Computer and browser use

All 69 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%