TruthfulQA
Models answer 817 questions across 38 categories that are written to elicit common misconceptions. Scoring checks for truthful answers, often in multiple-choice form.
In January 2025 the authors added a two-option multiple-choice format and now recommend it. They say MC1 and MC2 results stay valid, so it remains one record.
- Made by
- University of Oxford and OpenAI
- Released
- September 2021
- Kind
- Short factual questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen2.5-72B #165 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- June 2026, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We propose a benchmark to measure whether a language model is truthful in generating answers to questions. The benchmark comprises 817 questions that span 38 categories, including health, law, finance and politics. We crafted questions that some humans would answer falsely due to a false belief or misconception. To perform well, models must avoid generating false answers learned from imitating human texts. We tested GPT-3, GPT-Neo/J, GPT-2 and a T5-based model. The best model was truthful on 58% of questions, while human performance was 94%. Models generated many false answers that mimic popular misconceptions and have the potential to deceive humans. The largest models were generally the least truthful. This contrasts with other NLP tasks, where performance improves with model size. However, this result is expected if false answers are learned from the training distribution. We suggest that scaling up models alone is less promising for improving truthfulness than fine-tuning using training objectives other than imitation of text from the web.
MAI-Thinking-1 leads with 88%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
GPT-2 (1.5B) leads with 29.5% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
MAI-Thinking-1 leads with 88%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 88.0
MAI-Thinking-1
- 77.5
Phi-3.5-MoE
- 75.7
phi-3-medium 14B
- 73.2
OLMo 2 32B Instruct
- 71.2
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base
- 70.2
phi-3-small 7.4B
- 69.0 Claude 2
- 66.9 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct
- 66.9 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
- 66.4
Phi-4 Mini
- 65.3
Falcon-H1-34B
- 65.0
phi-3-mini 3.8B
- 64.0
Phi-3.5-mini
- 61.2
Apertus 70B
- 60.4
Qwen2.5-72B
- 60.0 GPT-4
- 55.5
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base
- 54.8
Qwen2-72B
- 51.6
Gemma 2 27B
- 50.5
Mistral Large
- 50.3
Gemma 2 9B
- 50.2
Llama 2-70B
- 48.7
OLMo 2 1B Instruct
- 45.3
BitNet b1.58 2B4T
- 44.8
Gemma 2B
- 43.5
Llama 2-34B
- 41.9
Llama 2-13B
- 33.3
Llama 2-7B
- 31.8
Gemma 7B
- 31.5
Falcon-Arabic-7B
- 1
MAI-Thinking-1 88%
- 2
Phi-3.5-MoE 77.5%
- 3
phi-3-medium 14B 75.7%
- 4
OLMo 2 32B Instruct 73.2%
- 5
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 71.2%
- 6
phi-3-small 7.4B 70.2%
- 7 Claude 2 69%
- 8 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct 66.9%
- 9 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 66.9%
- 10
Phi-4 Mini 66.4%
- 11
Falcon-H1-34B 65.3%
- 12
phi-3-mini 3.8B 65%
- 13
Phi-3.5-mini 64%
- 14
Apertus 70B 61.2%
- 15
Qwen2.5-72B 60.4%
- 16 GPT-4 Mar 2023 60%
- 17
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 55.5%
- 18
Qwen2-72B 54.8%
- 19
Gemma 2 27B 51.6%
- 20
Mistral Large 50.5%
- 21
Gemma 2 9B 50.3%
- 22
Llama 2-70B 50.2%
- 23
OLMo 2 1B Instruct 48.7%
- 24
BitNet b1.58 2B4T 45.3%
- 25
Gemma 2B 44.8%
- 26
Llama 2-34B 43.5%
- 27
Llama 2-13B 41.9%
- 28
Llama 2-7B 33.3%
- 29
Gemma 7B 31.8%
- 30
Falcon-Arabic-7B 31.5%
Source: Labs’ model cards
Source: Official TruthfulQA leaderboard
- 88.0
MAI-Thinking-1
- 77.5
Phi-3.5-MoE
- 75.7
phi-3-medium 14B
- 73.2
OLMo 2 32B Instruct
- 71.2
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base
- 70.2
phi-3-small 7.4B
- 69.0 Claude 2
- 66.9 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct
- 66.9 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
- 66.4
Phi-4 Mini
- 65.3
Falcon-H1-34B
- 65.0
phi-3-mini 3.8B
- 64.0
Phi-3.5-mini
- 61.2
Apertus 70B
- 60.4
Qwen2.5-72B
- 60.0 GPT-4
- 55.5
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base
- 54.8
Qwen2-72B
- 51.6
Gemma 2 27B
- 50.5
Mistral Large
- 50.3
Gemma 2 9B
- 50.2
Llama 2-70B
- 48.7
OLMo 2 1B Instruct
- 45.3
BitNet b1.58 2B4T
- 44.8
Gemma 2B
- 43.5
Llama 2-34B
- 41.9
Llama 2-13B
- 33.3
Llama 2-7B
- 31.8
Gemma 7B
- 31.5
Falcon-Arabic-7B
- 29.5 GPT-2 (1.5B)
- 26.7 GPT-J-6B
- 1
MAI-Thinking-1 88%
- 2
Phi-3.5-MoE 77.5%
- 3
phi-3-medium 14B 75.7%
- 4
OLMo 2 32B Instruct 73.2%
- 5
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 71.2%
- 6
phi-3-small 7.4B 70.2%
- 7 Claude 2 69%
- 8 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct 66.9%
- 9 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 66.9%
- 10
Phi-4 Mini 66.4%
- 11
Falcon-H1-34B 65.3%
- 12
phi-3-mini 3.8B 65%
- 13
Phi-3.5-mini 64%
- 14
Apertus 70B 61.2%
- 15
Qwen2.5-72B 60.4%
- 16 GPT-4 Mar 2023 60%
- 17
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 55.5%
- 18
Qwen2-72B 54.8%
- 19
Gemma 2 27B 51.6%
- 20
Mistral Large 50.5%
- 21
Gemma 2 9B 50.3%
- 22
Llama 2-70B 50.2%
- 23
OLMo 2 1B Instruct 48.7%
- 24
BitNet b1.58 2B4T 45.3%
- 25
Gemma 2B 44.8%
- 26
Llama 2-34B 43.5%
- 27
Llama 2-13B 41.9%
- 28
Llama 2-7B 33.3%
- 29
Gemma 7B 31.8%
- 30
Falcon-Arabic-7B 31.5%
- 31 GPT-2 (1.5B) generation, updated references 29.5%
- 32 GPT-J-6B generation, updated references 26.7%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official TruthfulQA leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 88% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 77.5% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 75.7% | Apr 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 73.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 71.2% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 70.2% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | Claude 2 | 69% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Granite 3.2 8B Instruct | 66.9% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | 66.9% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 66.4% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 65.3% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 65% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 64% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 61.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 60.4% | Sep 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 60% | Mar 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 55.5% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 54.8% | Jun 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 51.6% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 50.5% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 50.3% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 50.2% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 48.7% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 45.3% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 44.8% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 43.5% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | | 41.9% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 33.3% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 31.8% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | | 31.5% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-2 (1.5B) | 29.5% | generation, updated references | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-J-6B | 26.7% | generation, updated references | Aug 2021 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 88% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 77.5% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 75.7% | Apr 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 73.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 71.2% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 70.2% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | Claude 2 | 69% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Granite 3.2 8B Instruct | 66.9% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | 66.9% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 66.4% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 65.3% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 65% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 64% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 61.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 60.4% | Sep 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 60% | Mar 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 55.5% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 54.8% | Jun 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 51.6% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 50.5% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 50.3% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 50.2% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 48.7% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 45.3% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 44.8% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 43.5% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | | 41.9% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 33.3% | Jul 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 31.8% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | | 31.5% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | GPT-2 (1.5B) | 29.5% | generation, updated references | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard |
| 32 | GPT-J-6B | 26.7% | generation, updated references | Aug 2021 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 4 entries, 2 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023 Number one over time 6 models have held number one with claims included since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Microsoft’s own number for MAI-Thinking-1 passed 85% in June 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official TruthfulQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in June 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2026 | 88 | Truthful QA | |
| May 20, 2025 | 65.3 | TruthfulQA | |
| Apr 29, 2025 | 48.7 | TruthQA | |
| Apr 16, 2025 | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | 66.9 | TruthfulQA |
| Apr 15, 2025 | 45.3 | TruthfulQA | |
| Mar 13, 2025 | 73.2 | TruthQA | |
| Feb 26, 2025 | 66.4 | TruthfulQA (MC2) (10-shot) | |
| Feb 26, 2025 | Granite 3.2 8B Instruct | 66.9 | TruthfulQA |
| Sep 19, 2024 | 60.4 | TruthfulQA | |
| Aug 20, 2024 | 77.5 | TruthfulQA (MC2) (10-shot) | |
| Jun 7, 2024 | 54.8 | TruthfulQA | |
| Apr 22, 2024 | 75.7 | TruthfulQA (10-Shot) | |
| Feb 26, 2024 | 50.5 | TruthfulQA |
28 system cards report it, from 9 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 71.2 | TruthfulQA MC2, 0-shot acc, Table 6 | Capabilities |
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 55.5 | TruthfulQA MC2, 0-shot acc, Table 6 | Capabilities |
| Jun 2, 2026 | | 88 | Truthful QA, multiple-choice accuracy, Honesty (Table 12, rounded) | Hallucination |
| Nov 8, 2025 | | 31.5 | TruthfulQA 0-shot (Table 8) | Hallucination |
| Oct 8, 2025 | | 48.7 | TQA, TruthfulQA (Table 7, Table 23) | Hallucination |
| Sep 17, 2025 | | 61.2 | TruthQA (TruthfulQA mc2) (Table 17). TruthQA Multilingual 53.7 | Capabilities |
| Jul 30, 2025 | | 65.3 | TruthfulQA, logprobs 0-shot (Table 24) | Capabilities |
| Apr 16, 2025 | | 45.3 | TruthfulQA (10-shot; MC2) (Table 1, Table 3) | Hallucination |
| Mar 3, 2025 | | 66.4 | TruthfulQA (10-Shot, MC2) (Table 7) | Hallucination |
| Dec 31, 2024 | | 73.2 | TruthfulQA, 6-shot MC2 (Tables 7 and 16) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 70.2 | TruthfulQA (10-Shot, MC2) (Section 3 table) | Hallucination |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 65 | TruthfulQA (10-Shot, MC2) (Section 3 table) | Hallucination |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 75.1 | TruthfulQA (10-Shot, MC2) (Section 3 table) | Hallucination |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 77.5 | TruthfulQA (10-shot, MC2) (Table 3) | Hallucination |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 64 | TruthfulQA (10-shot, MC2) (Table 3) | Hallucination |
| Jul 31, 2024 | | 50.3 | TruthfulQA, MC2Acc, IT (Table 18) | Hallucination |
| Jul 31, 2024 | | 51.6 | TruthfulQA, MC2Acc, IT (Table 18) | Hallucination |
| Mar 13, 2024 | | 31.8 | TruthfulQA, MC2, IT (Table 8). HuggingFace H6 run of the PT model (Table 7): 44.8 | Hallucination |
| Mar 13, 2024 | | 44.8 | TruthfulQA, MC2, IT (Table 8) | Hallucination |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 33.3 | TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative generations, pretrained (Table 11). Llama 2-Chat = 57.04 (Table 14) | Safety |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 50.2 | TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative generations, pretrained (Table 11). Llama 2-Chat = 64.14 (Table 14) | Safety |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 43.5 | TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative generations, pretrained (Table 11). Llama 2-Chat = 67.2 (Table 14) | Safety |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 41.9 | TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative generations, pretrained (Table 11). Llama 2-Chat = 62.18 (Table 14) | Safety |
| Jul 18, 2023 | | 33.3 | TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative, pretrained (automatic safety benchmarks table). Llama-2-Chat = 57.04 | Safety |
| Jul 18, 2023 | | 50.2 | TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative, pretrained (automatic safety benchmarks table). Llama-2-Chat = 64.14 | Safety |
| Jul 18, 2023 | | 41.9 | TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative, pretrained (automatic safety benchmarks table). Llama-2-Chat = 62.18 | Safety |
| Jul 11, 2023 | Claude 2 model card | 69 | TruthfulQA with free-form sampling, answers mapped to multiple choice options by the helpful-only model, score 0.69 (3.3, Figure 4) | Hallucination |
| Mar 14, 2023 | GPT-4 technical report | 60 | TruthfulQA mc1, post-trained GPT-4, around 60% stated in System Card text (3.1), Figure 7 chart has no printed numbers | Hallucination |
One logged change that moves scores
Changes by the maintainers, so a score from before a change may not compare with one from after it. Newest first, each with the maintainers' own source. The list may be incomplete. What we log.
- Metric changed January 15th, 2025
The maintainers added a recommended two-option multiple-choice format with randomized answer order. They retain the earlier formats and state that previous results remain valid. Source
More in Factuality
- SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references.
Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
- HallusionBench In use Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy.
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
- SimpleQA Verified In use 1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge.
Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
- Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. GPT-6 Astra 4.20%
- Internal adversarially-designed factuality evaluations In use Models answer adversarial questions in nine categories such as history, math and code. Scored on agreement with human ideal responses. GPT-6 Luna 7.60%
- AA-Omniscience v1.1 In use Models answer 3,000 knowledge questions in six domains without tools and may abstain. The index adds correct answers and subtracts wrong ones.
Inkling 2 Small 16.1