Benchmark Almanac

TruthfulQA

MAI-Thinking-1 88% leads since June 2026
GPT-2 (1.5B) 29.5% leads
MAI-Thinking-1 88% leads since June 2026
Fading

Models answer 817 questions across 38 categories that are written to elicit common misconceptions. Scoring checks for truthful answers, often in multiple-choice form.

In January 2025 the authors added a two-option multiple-choice format and now recommend it. They say MC1 and MC2 results stay valid, so it remains one record.

Released
September 2021
Kind
Short factual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen2.5-72B #165 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
June 2026, dropped after it saturated
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We propose a benchmark to measure whether a language model is truthful in generating answers to questions. The benchmark comprises 817 questions that span 38 categories, including health, law, finance and politics. We crafted questions that some humans would answer falsely due to a false belief or misconception. To perform well, models must avoid generating false answers learned from imitating human texts. We tested GPT-3, GPT-Neo/J, GPT-2 and a T5-based model. The best model was truthful on 58% of questions, while human performance was 94%. Models generated many false answers that mimic popular misconceptions and have the potential to deceive humans. The largest models were generally the least truthful. This contrasts with other NLP tasks, where performance improves with model size. However, this result is expected if false answers are learned from the training distribution. We suggest that scaling up models alone is less promising for improving truthfulness than fine-tuning using training objectives other than imitation of text from the web.

Abstract of TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods (arXiv:2109.07958, CC0)
30
Models scored in lab cards
13
Launch posts list it, from 6 labs
28
System cards report it, from 9 labs

MAI-Thinking-1 leads with 88%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

GPT-2 (1.5B) leads with 29.5% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

MAI-Thinking-1 leads with 88%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 MAI-Thinking-1 88%
  2. 2 Phi-3.5-MoE 77.5%
  3. 3 phi-3-medium 14B 75.7%
  4. 4 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 73.2%
  5. 5 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 71.2%
  6. 6 phi-3-small 7.4B 70.2%
  7. 7 Claude 2 69%
  8. 8 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct 66.9%
  9. 9 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 66.9%
  10. 10 Phi-4 Mini 66.4%
  11. 11 Falcon-H1-34B 65.3%
  12. 12 phi-3-mini 3.8B 65%
  13. 13 Phi-3.5-mini 64%
  14. 14 Apertus 70B 61.2%
  15. 15 Qwen2.5-72B 60.4%
  16. 16 GPT-4 Mar 2023 60%
  17. 17 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 55.5%
  18. 18 Qwen2-72B 54.8%
  19. 19 Gemma 2 27B 51.6%
  20. 20 Mistral Large 50.5%
  21. 21 Gemma 2 9B 50.3%
  22. 22 Llama 2-70B 50.2%
  23. 23 OLMo 2 1B Instruct 48.7%
  24. 24 BitNet b1.58 2B4T 45.3%
  25. 25 Gemma 2B 44.8%
  26. 26 Llama 2-34B 43.5%
  27. 27 Llama 2-13B 41.9%
  28. 28 Llama 2-7B 33.3%
  29. 29 Gemma 7B 31.8%
  30. 30 Falcon-Arabic-7B 31.5%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official TruthfulQA leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MAI-Thinking-1 88% Jun 2026 Lab model card
2 Phi-3.5-MoE 77.5% Aug 2024 Lab model card
3 phi-3-medium 14B 75.7% Apr 2024 Lab model card
4 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 73.2% Mar 2025 Lab model card
5 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 71.2% Oct 2026 Lab model card
6 phi-3-small 7.4B 70.2% Aug 2024 Lab model card
7 Claude 2 69% Jul 2023 Lab model card
8 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct 66.9% Feb 2025 Lab model card
9 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 66.9% Apr 2025 Lab model card
10 Phi-4 Mini 66.4% Feb 2025 Lab model card
11 Falcon-H1-34B 65.3% May 2025 Lab model card
12 phi-3-mini 3.8B 65% Aug 2024 Lab model card
13 Phi-3.5-mini 64% Aug 2024 Lab model card
14 Apertus 70B 61.2% Sep 2025 Lab model card
15 Qwen2.5-72B 60.4% Sep 2024 Lab model card
16 GPT-4 Mar 2023 60% Mar 2023 Lab model card
17 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 55.5% Oct 2026 Lab model card
18 Qwen2-72B 54.8% Jun 2024 Lab model card
19 Gemma 2 27B 51.6% Jul 2024 Lab model card
20 Mistral Large 50.5% Feb 2024 Lab model card
21 Gemma 2 9B 50.3% Jul 2024 Lab model card
22 Llama 2-70B 50.2% Jul 2023 Lab model card
23 OLMo 2 1B Instruct 48.7% Apr 2025 Lab model card
24 BitNet b1.58 2B4T 45.3% Apr 2025 Lab model card
25 Gemma 2B 44.8% Mar 2024 Lab model card
26 Llama 2-34B 43.5% Jul 2023 Lab model card
27 Llama 2-13B 41.9% Jul 2023 Lab model card
28 Llama 2-7B 33.3% Jul 2023 Lab model card
29 Gemma 7B 31.8% Mar 2024 Lab model card
30 Falcon-Arabic-7B 31.5% Nov 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-2 (1.5B) 29.5% generation, updated references Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-J-6B 26.7% generation, updated references Aug 2021 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MAI-Thinking-1 88% Jun 2026 Lab model card
2 Phi-3.5-MoE 77.5% Aug 2024 Lab model card
3 phi-3-medium 14B 75.7% Apr 2024 Lab model card
4 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 73.2% Mar 2025 Lab model card
5 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 71.2% Oct 2026 Lab model card
6 phi-3-small 7.4B 70.2% Aug 2024 Lab model card
7 Claude 2 69% Jul 2023 Lab model card
8 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct 66.9% Feb 2025 Lab model card
9 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 66.9% Apr 2025 Lab model card
10 Phi-4 Mini 66.4% Feb 2025 Lab model card
11 Falcon-H1-34B 65.3% May 2025 Lab model card
12 phi-3-mini 3.8B 65% Aug 2024 Lab model card
13 Phi-3.5-mini 64% Aug 2024 Lab model card
14 Apertus 70B 61.2% Sep 2025 Lab model card
15 Qwen2.5-72B 60.4% Sep 2024 Lab model card
16 GPT-4 Mar 2023 60% Mar 2023 Lab model card
17 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 55.5% Oct 2026 Lab model card
18 Qwen2-72B 54.8% Jun 2024 Lab model card
19 Gemma 2 27B 51.6% Jul 2024 Lab model card
20 Mistral Large 50.5% Feb 2024 Lab model card
21 Gemma 2 9B 50.3% Jul 2024 Lab model card
22 Llama 2-70B 50.2% Jul 2023 Lab model card
23 OLMo 2 1B Instruct 48.7% Apr 2025 Lab model card
24 BitNet b1.58 2B4T 45.3% Apr 2025 Lab model card
25 Gemma 2B 44.8% Mar 2024 Lab model card
26 Llama 2-34B 43.5% Jul 2023 Lab model card
27 Llama 2-13B 41.9% Jul 2023 Lab model card
28 Llama 2-7B 33.3% Jul 2023 Lab model card
29 Gemma 7B 31.8% Mar 2024 Lab model card
30 Falcon-Arabic-7B 31.5% Nov 2025 Lab model card
31 GPT-2 (1.5B) 29.5% generation, updated references Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
32 GPT-J-6B 26.7% generation, updated references Aug 2021 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 4 entries, 2 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023 Number one over time 6 models have held number one with claims included since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Anthropic Microsoft
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by MAI-Thinking-1

Source: Labs’ model cards

Microsoft’s own number for MAI-Thinking-1 passed 85% in June 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MAI-Thinking-1 Phi-3.5-MoE Claude 2 GPT-4 GPT-2 (1.5B) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2020 2022 2024 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MAI-Thinking-1 Phi-3.5-MoE

Sources: Official TruthfulQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in June 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Mistral AI
Microsoft
Qwen
IBM
Ai2
Technology Innovation Institute
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Thinking-1 88 Truthful QA
May 20, 2025 Falcon-H1-34B 65.3 TruthfulQA
Apr 29, 2025 OLMo 2 1B Instruct 48.7 TruthQA
Apr 16, 2025 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 66.9 TruthfulQA
Apr 15, 2025 BitNet b1.58 2B4T 45.3 TruthfulQA
Mar 13, 2025 OLMo 2 32B Instruct 73.2 TruthQA
Feb 26, 2025 Phi-4 Mini 66.4 TruthfulQA (MC2) (10-shot)
Feb 26, 2025 Granite 3.2 8B Instruct 66.9 TruthfulQA
Sep 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-72B 60.4 TruthfulQA
Aug 20, 2024 Phi-3.5-MoE 77.5 TruthfulQA (MC2) (10-shot)
Jun 7, 2024 Qwen2-72B 54.8 TruthfulQA
Apr 22, 2024 phi-3-medium 14B 75.7 TruthfulQA (10-Shot)
Feb 26, 2024 Mistral Large 50.5 TruthfulQA

28 system cards report it, from 9 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base technical report 71.2 TruthfulQA MC2, 0-shot acc, Table 6 Capabilities
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base technical report 55.5 TruthfulQA MC2, 0-shot acc, Table 6 Capabilities
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Thinking-1 technical report 88 Truthful QA, multiple-choice accuracy, Honesty (Table 12, rounded) Hallucination
Nov 8, 2025 Falcon-Arabic-7B technical report 31.5 TruthfulQA 0-shot (Table 8) Hallucination
Oct 8, 2025 OLMo 2 1B Instruct technical report 48.7 TQA, TruthfulQA (Table 7, Table 23) Hallucination
Sep 17, 2025 Apertus 70B technical report 61.2 TruthQA (TruthfulQA mc2) (Table 17). TruthQA Multilingual 53.7 Capabilities
Jul 30, 2025 Falcon-H1-34B technical report 65.3 TruthfulQA, logprobs 0-shot (Table 24) Capabilities
Apr 16, 2025 BitNet b1.58 2B4T technical report 45.3 TruthfulQA (10-shot; MC2) (Table 1, Table 3) Hallucination
Mar 3, 2025 Phi-4 Mini technical report 66.4 TruthfulQA (10-Shot, MC2) (Table 7) Hallucination
Dec 31, 2024 OLMo 2 32B Instruct technical report 73.2 TruthfulQA, 6-shot MC2 (Tables 7 and 16) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 phi-3-small 7.4B technical report 70.2 TruthfulQA (10-Shot, MC2) (Section 3 table) Hallucination
Aug 30, 2024 phi-3-mini 3.8B technical report 65 TruthfulQA (10-Shot, MC2) (Section 3 table) Hallucination
Aug 30, 2024 phi-3-medium 14B technical report 75.1 TruthfulQA (10-Shot, MC2) (Section 3 table) Hallucination
Aug 30, 2024 Phi-3.5-MoE technical report 77.5 TruthfulQA (10-shot, MC2) (Table 3) Hallucination
Aug 30, 2024 Phi-3.5-mini technical report 64 TruthfulQA (10-shot, MC2) (Table 3) Hallucination
Jul 31, 2024 Gemma 2 9B technical report 50.3 TruthfulQA, MC2Acc, IT (Table 18) Hallucination
Jul 31, 2024 Gemma 2 27B technical report 51.6 TruthfulQA, MC2Acc, IT (Table 18) Hallucination
Mar 13, 2024 Gemma 7B technical report 31.8 TruthfulQA, MC2, IT (Table 8). HuggingFace H6 run of the PT model (Table 7): 44.8 Hallucination
Mar 13, 2024 Gemma 2B technical report 44.8 TruthfulQA, MC2, IT (Table 8) Hallucination
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-7B technical report 33.3 TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative generations, pretrained (Table 11). Llama 2-Chat = 57.04 (Table 14) Safety
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-70B technical report 50.2 TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative generations, pretrained (Table 11). Llama 2-Chat = 64.14 (Table 14) Safety
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-34B technical report 43.5 TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative generations, pretrained (Table 11). Llama 2-Chat = 67.2 (Table 14) Safety
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-13B technical report 41.9 TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative generations, pretrained (Table 11). Llama 2-Chat = 62.18 (Table 14) Safety
Jul 18, 2023 Llama 2-7B model card 33.3 TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative, pretrained (automatic safety benchmarks table). Llama-2-Chat = 57.04 Safety
Jul 18, 2023 Llama 2-70B model card 50.2 TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative, pretrained (automatic safety benchmarks table). Llama-2-Chat = 64.14 Safety
Jul 18, 2023 Llama 2-13B model card 41.9 TruthfulQA, % truthful and informative, pretrained (automatic safety benchmarks table). Llama-2-Chat = 62.18 Safety
Jul 11, 2023 Claude 2 model card 69 TruthfulQA with free-form sampling, answers mapped to multiple choice options by the helpful-only model, score 0.69 (3.3, Figure 4) Hallucination
Mar 14, 2023 GPT-4 technical report 60 TruthfulQA mc1, post-trained GPT-4, around 60% stated in System Card text (3.1), Figure 7 chart has no printed numbers Hallucination

One logged change that moves scores

Changes by the maintainers, so a score from before a change may not compare with one from after it. Newest first, each with the maintainers' own source. The list may be incomplete. What we log.

  1. Metric changed January 15th, 2025

    The maintainers added a recommended two-option multiple-choice format with randomized answer order. They retain the earlier formats and state that previous results remain valid. Source

More in Factuality

All 74 in Factuality
  • SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references. Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
  • HallusionBench In use Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy. Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
  • SimpleQA Verified In use 1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge. Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
  • Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. GPT-6 Astra 4.20%
  • Internal adversarially-designed factuality evaluations In use Models answer adversarial questions in nine categories such as history, math and code. Scored on agreement with human ideal responses. GPT-6 Luna 7.60%
  • AA-Omniscience v1.1 In use Models answer 3,000 knowledge questions in six domains without tools and may abstain. The index adds correct answers and subtracts wrong ones. Inkling 2 Small 16.1