Benchmark Almanac

ABC Bench Fragment Design

Gemini 3 Pro 100% leads since June 2026
Gemini 3 Pro 100% leads since June 2026
Only in system cards

Agents use biology tools to complete a computational genetic-construct design task. One task family of the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark.

ABC Bench has three task families reported separately: Fragment Design, Liquid-Handling Robot and Screening Evasion.

Made by
SecureBio
Released
June 2026
Kind
Hazardous knowledge
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.5 Pro #14 on the capability index
Last in a system card
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly acquiring capabilities relevant to biological research, from literature synthesis to interpretation of experimental data. Increasingly, LLM agents can also perform in silico biology tasks that previously required experienced human biologists. These emerging AI capabilities offer new opportunities for scientific discovery and biomedical advances, but they also shift the landscape of biosecurity risks. To address this, we introduce the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark (ABC-Bench), a suite of tasks to measure agentic biosecurity-relevant capabilities. ABC-Bench evaluates LLM agents on both benign and dual-use biology tasks: writing code to operate liquid handling robots, designing DNA fragments for in vitro assembly, and evading DNA synthesis screening. These tasks require a combination of biology and software expertise. All tested LLM agents outperformed the median expert human baseliner on all three tasks. Agents performed highly on tasks drawing on published knowledge and well-documented protocols, and more weakly on a task requiring novel bioinformatics reasoning. In three wet-lab validation experiments, we found that OpenAI's o4-mini-high produced scripts that, when run on an OpenTrons liquid handling robot, successfully assembled DNA with expected sequences.

Abstract of ABC-Bench: An Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark for Biosecurity (arXiv:2606.11150, CC0)
27
Models scored on its own leaderboard
5
System cards report it, from 2 labs

2 models share the top score of 100%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 100%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro high 100%
  2. 2 Grok 4.7 xhigh 100%
  3. 3 GLM-5.2 max 99.8%
  4. 4 Mistral Large 4 high 98.5%
  5. 5 Nemotron 3 Ultra 96.2%
  6. 6 Claude Sonnet 4 16k 96%
  7. 7 Inkling xhigh 95.7%
  8. 8 GLM-5.3 max 94.6%
  9. 9 Gemini 3.1 Pro high 94%
  10. 10 Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B xhigh 91.8%
  11. 11 DeepSeek-V4-Pro max 91.1%
  12. 12 GPT-5.4 xhigh 90.9%
  13. 13 Qwen 3.8 27B xhigh 90.7%
  14. 14 Gemma 4 31B IT 89.4%
  15. 15 Inkling-Small xhigh 88.4%
  16. 16 Qwen3.6 27B 88.2%
  17. 17 GPT-5.5 Pro xhigh 87%
  18. 18 Kimi K3.1 Pro max 84.2%
  19. 19 Kimi K3 max 82.5%
  20. 20 Beam 1.0 max 77.5%
  21. 21 Kimi K2.6 76.5%
  22. 22 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 76.3%
  23. 23 Kimi K2.5 74.8%
  24. 24 Nemotron 3 Super 74.4%
  25. 25 Claude Opus 4 16k 71%
  26. 26 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 42.6%
  27. 27 Claude Opus 4.8 max 19.8%

Source: Official ABC Bench Fragment Design leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 100% high Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Grok 4.7 100% xhigh Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GLM-5.2 99.8% max Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Mistral Large 4 98.5% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Nemotron 3 Ultra 96.2% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Sonnet 4 96% 16k May 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Inkling 95.7% xhigh Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 GLM-5.3 94.6% max Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 3.1 Pro 94% high Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B 91.8% xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
11 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 91.1% max Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-5.4 90.9% xhigh Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen 3.8 27B 90.7% xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Gemma 4 31B IT 89.4% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Inkling-Small 88.4% xhigh Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen3.6 27B 88.2% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-5.5 Pro 87% xhigh, Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.2% max Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Kimi K3 82.5% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Beam 1.0 77.5% max Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Kimi K2.6 76.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 76.3% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
23 Kimi K2.5 74.8% Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
24 Nemotron 3 Super 74.4% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
25 Claude Opus 4 71% 16k May 2025 Official leaderboard
26 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 42.6% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Claude Opus 4.8 19.8% max May 2026 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 100% high Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Grok 4.7 100% xhigh Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GLM-5.2 99.8% max Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Mistral Large 4 98.5% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Nemotron 3 Ultra 96.2% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Sonnet 4 96% 16k May 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Inkling 95.7% xhigh Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 GLM-5.3 94.6% max Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 3.1 Pro 94% high Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B 91.8% xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
11 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 91.1% max Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-5.4 90.9% xhigh Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen 3.8 27B 90.7% xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Gemma 4 31B IT 89.4% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Inkling-Small 88.4% xhigh Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen3.6 27B 88.2% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-5.5 Pro 87% xhigh, Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.2% max Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Kimi K3 82.5% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Beam 1.0 82.1% Oct 2026 Lab model card
21 Kimi K2.6 76.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 76.3% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
23 Kimi K2.5 74.8% Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
24 Nemotron 3 Super 74.4% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
25 Claude Opus 4 71% 16k May 2025 Official leaderboard
26 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 42.6% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Claude Opus 4.8 19.8% max May 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by Gemini 3 Pro

Source: Official ABC Bench Fragment Design leaderboard

Claude Sonnet 4 on the official leaderboard passed 85% in May 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro Claude Sonnet 4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro

Sources: Official ABC Bench Fragment Design leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

5 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 23, 2026 Muse Spark 1.3 system card 96.5 ABC Bench Fragment Design score, Muse Spark 1.3 (API) (Table 1, Figure 3) Bio and chem risk
Oct 12, 2026 Muse Wonder Full model card ABC Bench Fragment Design, no score printed because of a high refusal rate (CBRN Capability Evaluations table, section 4) Bio and chem risk
Oct 5, 2026 Beam 1.0 technical report 82.1 ABC-Bench Fragment Design, 23 of 28 completed attempts passed, Pass@1 Bio and chem risk
Jul 9, 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 system card 97 ABC Bench (Fragment Design), Muse Spark 1.1 Helpful (Table 1, Figure 4) Bio and chem risk
Jun 12, 2026 Muse Spark system card 96.8 ABC Bench (FD) Fragment Design (Table 1, Figure 4) Bio and chem risk

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Beam 1.0 82.1% ABC-Bench Fragment Design, 23 of 28 completed attempts passed, Pass@1 77.5% Leaderboard, max +4.6 pts

More in Biology and chemistry

All 108 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
  • MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
  • ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%