Benchmark Almanac

Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small places in the top three on 2 benchmarks.

Thinking Machines Released July 15th, 2026 Compare with others
92
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
2
In the top three
Thinking Machines Jul 2026

Inkling-Small

Open weights

150.8 #67 of 256
Epoch Capabilities Index
Self-Reported Index 149.8 #97 of 404
  • MMMU-Pro 74% #43 /90
  • IFBench 82.2% #3 /80
  • SciCode 48.7% #12 /49

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
IFBench 82.2% #3 of 80 Lab model card
Humanity's Last Exam 47.8% #50 of 154 Lab model card
LMArena (Elo) 1,405 #125 of 335 Official leaderboard
SEA-HELM 71.5 #29 of 71 Official leaderboard
StudyArena Text 1,227 #48 of 85 Official leaderboard
AA-Omniscience -9.0 #7 of 10 Lab model card
Creative Writing v3 58.9 #85 of 120 Official leaderboard
Global MMLU Lite 3.0 86.7% #3 of 4 Lab model card
SimpleQA Verified 19.1% #83 of 94 Epoch AI run
OpenAI MRCR v2 10% #44 of 47 Official leaderboard

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
AIME 2026 95.5% #9 of 38 Lab model card
GPQA Diamond 88.5% #59 of 229 Epoch AI run
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 90% #69 of 212 Epoch AI run
ARC-AGI-2 40.1% #46 of 98 Official leaderboard
ARC-AGI 84% #47 of 95 Official leaderboard
HMMT 2026 90.2% #11 of 19 Lab model card
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 46.3% #55 of 86 Official leaderboard
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 17.1% #50 of 68 Official leaderboard
CritPt 8.30% #10 of 13 Lab model card
ProofBench 5.00% #52 of 59 Official leaderboard
ProofBench v1.1 6.00% #49 of 52 Official leaderboard

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
SWE-bench Verified 80.2% #19 of 155 Lab model card
SciCode 48.7% #12 of 49 Lab model card
SWE-Bench Pro 55.9% #47 of 81 Lab model card
WebDev Arena 1,407 #65 of 105 arena.ai, via Epoch AI
Code Arena 1,408 #82 of 128 Official leaderboard
Code Migration 13.7% #59 of 78 Official leaderboard
Vibe Code Bench 19.1% #92 of 120 Official leaderboard
Image-to-WebDev Arena 1,410 #50 of 55 Official leaderboard
FrontierCode 2.0 3.96% #30 of 32 Official leaderboard
Code Migration v1.1 10.4% #29 of 30 Official leaderboard
IOI v2 (Vals) 9.33% #44 of 45 Official leaderboard
ReactBench 7.69% #28 of 28 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MCP Atlas 79.2% #15 of 37 Official leaderboard
BrowseComp 77.4% #35 of 81 Lab model card
Toolathlon-Verified 54.4% #18 of 25 Official leaderboard
Terminal-Bench 2.1 64.7% #41 of 56 Lab model card
τ³-bench Banking 15.5% #18 of 22 Lab model card
Terminal-Bench 4.0 0.91% #38 of 40 Official leaderboard
Mystery Game Puzzles 6.00% #80 of 84 Epoch AI run
Terminal-Bench 4.1 0.91% #41 of 43 Official leaderboard
Agent Arena -18.06% #55 of 56 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
CorpFin v2 69.6% #6 of 119 Official leaderboard
TaxEval v2 75.5% #18 of 129 Official leaderboard
MedScribe 84.1% #37 of 97 Official leaderboard
LegalBench 83% #62 of 138 Official leaderboard
MortgageTax 62.3% #52 of 87 Official leaderboard
Harvey LAB (Legal Agent Benchmark) 1.67% #53 of 80 Official leaderboard
Public Benefits Bench 59.4% #34 of 50 Official leaderboard
Legal Research Bench 25.5% #66 of 93 Official leaderboard
MedCode 37.9% #69 of 96 Official leaderboard
Tax Agent Bench 15.4% #62 of 84 Official leaderboard
GDPval-AA v2 1,269 #20 of 27 Lab model card
Vals Finance Agent v2 41.3% #62 of 80 Official leaderboard
Vals Index v2 31.9% #53 of 65 Official leaderboard
CorpBench Work 66.2 #14 of 17 Official leaderboard
Excel Modeling Benchmark 31.8% #64 of 76 Official leaderboard
CAD Arena 0.14 #11 of 12 Official leaderboard
Vals Legal Index 57.8% #36 of 38 Official leaderboard
Harvey LAB v1.1 (HLAB-Vals-1.1) 2.92% #37 of 38 Official leaderboard
Vals Index v2.1 25.5% #48 of 49 Official leaderboard
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 40.8% #42 of 42 Official leaderboard
Vals Finance Agent v2.1 44.8% #40 of 40 Official leaderboard
Vals Finance Index 36.3% #40 of 40 Official leaderboard
Vals Index v2.2 27.6% #37 of 37 Official leaderboard
DeepFinance 10.9% #23 of 23 Official leaderboard
AA-Briefcase 917 #7 of 7 Lab model card

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Audio MC 54.9% #4 of 18 Official leaderboard
VoiceBench 90.1% #4 of 12 Lab model card
CharXiv 81.3% #28 of 75 Lab model card
MMAU 77% #7 of 15 Lab model card
MMMU-Pro 74% #43 of 90 Lab model card
ZeroBench 11% #38 of 76 Official leaderboard
Vision Arena 1,208 #75 of 136 Official leaderboard
Chartography 9.10% #42 of 43 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
StrongREJECT 98.4% #2 of 19 Lab model card
BioTIER Permit 99.8% #15 of 69 Official leaderboard
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test 54.9% #36 of 86 Official leaderboard
ABC Bench Screening Evasion 60.2% #8 of 17 Official leaderboard
Agentic BAIM-LLM Evaluation (ABLE) 57.5% #9 of 18 Official leaderboard
Molecular Biology Capabilities Test 48.2% #48 of 90 Official leaderboard
CyberBench (Vals) 68.8% #14 of 26 Official leaderboard
nocot-bench (NCRI) 70.2 #100 of 185 Official leaderboard
World-Class Bio 44.2% #41 of 74 Official leaderboard
ABC Bench Fragment Design 88.4% #15 of 27 Official leaderboard
ABC Bench Liquid-Handling Robot 87.3% #20 of 34 Official leaderboard
CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) 64.1% #31 of 44 Official leaderboard
BioTIER Refuse 24.9% #51 of 69 Official leaderboard
VCT-v2 34.5% #21 of 25 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Vals Multimodal Index 50% #26 of 33 Official leaderboard
SAGE (Vals) 32.7% #70 of 81 Official leaderboard
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 40.0 #8 of 8 Lab model card

Its lab's numbers put it at 149.8, in line with its ECI

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 21 capability results Thinking Machines reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 147.5 to 152.1. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 7 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
SimpleQA Verified 20.6% SimpleQA Verified 19.1% Epoch AI run, xhigh +1.5 pts
GPQA Diamond 89.5% GPQA Diamond 88.5% Epoch AI run, xhigh +1.0 pts
MCP Atlas 79.6% MCP Atlas public 79.6 / all 79.2 79.2% Leaderboard +0.4 pts
ARC-AGI-2 40.1% ARC-AGI-2 40.1% Leaderboard, xhigh Same
Audio MC 54.9% Audio MC 54.9% Leaderboard, text output Same
ARC-AGI 84% ARC-AGI-1 84% Leaderboard, xhigh Same
Toolathlon-Verified 54.4% Toolathlon Verified 54.4% Leaderboard, xhigh Same

Thinking Machines's models over time

Thinking Machines's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.

50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Inkling 50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Inkling

Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it.

Hallucination

Safety