Benchmark Almanac

ABC Bench Liquid-Handling Robot

Gemini 3.1 Pro 100% leads since June 2026
Only in system cards

Agents use biology tools to plan liquid-handling robot steps for a construct-assembly task. One task family of the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark.

Part of SecureBio ABC Bench with Fragment Design and Screening Evasion.

Made by
SecureBio
Released
June 2026
Kind
Hazardous knowledge
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
Last in a system card
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly acquiring capabilities relevant to biological research, from literature synthesis to interpretation of experimental data. Increasingly, LLM agents can also perform in silico biology tasks that previously required experienced human biologists. These emerging AI capabilities offer new opportunities for scientific discovery and biomedical advances, but they also shift the landscape of biosecurity risks. To address this, we introduce the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark (ABC-Bench), a suite of tasks to measure agentic biosecurity-relevant capabilities. ABC-Bench evaluates LLM agents on both benign and dual-use biology tasks: writing code to operate liquid handling robots, designing DNA fragments for in vitro assembly, and evading DNA synthesis screening. These tasks require a combination of biology and software expertise. All tested LLM agents outperformed the median expert human baseliner on all three tasks. Agents performed highly on tasks drawing on published knowledge and well-documented protocols, and more weakly on a task requiring novel bioinformatics reasoning. In three wet-lab validation experiments, we found that OpenAI's o4-mini-high produced scripts that, when run on an OpenTrons liquid handling robot, successfully assembled DNA with expected sequences.

Abstract of ABC-Bench: An Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark for Biosecurity (arXiv:2606.11150, CC0)
34
Models scored on its own leaderboard
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

5 models share the top score of 100%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

  1. 1 Gemini 3.1 Pro high 100%
  2. 2 GPT-5.5 Pro xhigh 100%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.8 max 100%
  4. 4 Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B xhigh 100%
  5. 5 Gemini 4 Argon high 100%
  6. 6 DeepSeek-V4-Pro max 99.3%
  7. 7 GLM-5.2 max 99.3%
  8. 8 Kimi K3 max 99.3%
  9. 9 GPT-5.6 Sol max 98.7%
  10. 10 Kimi K3.1 Pro max 98.3%
  11. 11 Grok 4.7 xhigh 98%
  12. 12 Mistral Large 4 high 98%
  13. 13 Beam 1.0 max 96.7%
  14. 14 Nemotron 3 Ultra 96%
  15. 15 Claude Opus 5 max 94%
  16. 16 Claude Opus 4 16k 93.3%
  17. 17 Inkling xhigh 92%
  18. 18 GLM-5.3 max 91.3%
  19. 19 Qwen 3.8 27B xhigh 90.3%
  20. 20 Inkling-Small xhigh 87.3%
  21. 21 GPT-6 Astra max 76.7%
  22. 22 Kimi K2.5 73.3%
  23. 23 GPT-5.4 xhigh 72.6%
  24. 24 Gemini 3 Pro 70%
  25. 25 Claude Opus 4.5 16k 68%
  26. 26 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 57.3%
  27. 27 Kimi K2.6 55.3%
  28. 28 Claude Sonnet 4 16k 51.3%
  29. 29 Nemotron 3 Super 47.7%
  30. 30 Qwen3.6 27B 45.3%
  31. 31 Gemma 4 31B IT 19.3%
  32. 32 Claude Sonnet 4.5 16k 6.30%
  33. 33 GPT-5.1 high 5.70%
  34. 34 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 0%

Source: Official ABC Bench Liquid-Handling Robot leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3.1 Pro 100% high Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.5 Pro 100% xhigh, Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.8 100% max May 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B 100% xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 4 Argon 100% high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 99.3% max Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
7 GLM-5.2 99.3% max Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Kimi K3 99.3% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.6 Sol 98.7% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Kimi K3.1 Pro 98.3% max Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Grok 4.7 98% xhigh Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Mistral Large 4 98% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Beam 1.0 96.7% max Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Nemotron 3 Ultra 96% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Claude Opus 5 94% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Claude Opus 4 93.3% 16k May 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Inkling 92% xhigh Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
18 GLM-5.3 91.3% max Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Qwen 3.8 27B 90.3% xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Inkling-Small 87.3% xhigh Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
21 GPT-6 Astra 76.7% max Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Kimi K2.5 73.3% Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
23 GPT-5.4 72.6% xhigh Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
24 Gemini 3 Pro 70% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
25 Claude Opus 4.5 68% 16k Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
26 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 57.3% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
27 Kimi K2.6 55.3% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
28 Claude Sonnet 4 51.3% 16k May 2025 Official leaderboard
29 Nemotron 3 Super 47.7% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
30 Qwen3.6 27B 45.3% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
31 Gemma 4 31B IT 19.3% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
32 Claude Sonnet 4.5 6.30% 16k Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
33 GPT-5.1 5.70% high Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
34 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 0% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by Gemini 3.1 Pro

Source: Official ABC Bench Liquid-Handling Robot leaderboard

Claude Opus 4 on the official leaderboard passed 85% in May 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3.1 Pro Claude Opus 4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3.1 Pro Claude Opus 4

Source: Official ABC Bench Liquid-Handling Robot leaderboard

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 23, 2026 Muse Spark 1.3 system card 95.2 ABC Bench Liquid-Handling Robot score, Muse Spark 1.3 (API) (Table 1, Figure 3) Bio and chem risk
Oct 12, 2026 Muse Wonder Full model card 100 ABC Bench Liquid Handling, printed as 100.0% (CBRN Capability Evaluations table, section 4) Bio and chem risk
Jul 9, 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 system card 93.7 ABC Bench (Liquid Handling), Muse Spark 1.1 Helpful (Table 1, Figure 4) Bio and chem risk
Jun 12, 2026 Muse Spark system card 92.3 ABC Bench (LH) Liquid Handling (Table 1, Figure 4) Bio and chem risk

More in Biology and chemistry

All 108 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
  • MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
  • ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%