Benchmark Almanac

ABC Bench Screening Evasion

Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.9% leads since October 2026
Only in system cards

Agents complete a computational task on nucleic-acid synthesis screening. One task family of the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark.

Many labs refuse these prompts, so comparison columns are sparse.

Made by
SecureBio
Released
June 2026
Kind
Hazardous knowledge
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Strongest model tested
Kimi K3.1 Pro #16 on the capability index
Last in a system card
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly acquiring capabilities relevant to biological research, from literature synthesis to interpretation of experimental data. Increasingly, LLM agents can also perform in silico biology tasks that previously required experienced human biologists. These emerging AI capabilities offer new opportunities for scientific discovery and biomedical advances, but they also shift the landscape of biosecurity risks. To address this, we introduce the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark (ABC-Bench), a suite of tasks to measure agentic biosecurity-relevant capabilities. ABC-Bench evaluates LLM agents on both benign and dual-use biology tasks: writing code to operate liquid handling robots, designing DNA fragments for in vitro assembly, and evading DNA synthesis screening. These tasks require a combination of biology and software expertise. All tested LLM agents outperformed the median expert human baseliner on all three tasks. Agents performed highly on tasks drawing on published knowledge and well-documented protocols, and more weakly on a task requiring novel bioinformatics reasoning. In three wet-lab validation experiments, we found that OpenAI's o4-mini-high produced scripts that, when run on an OpenTrons liquid handling robot, successfully assembled DNA with expected sequences.

Abstract of ABC-Bench: An Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark for Biosecurity (arXiv:2606.11150, CC0)
21
Entries on its own leaderboard, 17 models we track
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads with 82.9%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 Kimi K3.1 Pro max 82.9%
  2. 2 Gemini 3.1 Pro (Feb 26' Preview) high 77.8%
  3. 3 Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B xhigh 71.4%
  4. 4 GLM-5.2 max 70.4%
  5. 5 Kimi K3 max 69.1%
  6. 6 GLM-5.3 max 67.2%
  7. 7 Mistral Large 4 high 66.7%
  8. 8 Kimi K2.6 62.5%
  9. 9 Inkling-Small xhigh 60.2%
  10. 10 Qwen3.6 27B 57.2%
  11. 11 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 56.7%
  12. 12 Beam 1.0 max 56%
  13. 13 Inkling xhigh 55.9%
  14. 14 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B 55.4%
  15. 15 Gemini 3 Pro (Nov '25 Preview) high 55.1%
  16. 16 Qwen 3.8 27B xhigh 53.9%
  17. 17 Gemma 4 31B IT 51.5%
  18. 18 Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 47%
  19. 19 Kimi K2.5 43.5%
  20. 20 Claude Sonnet 4 16k 39.2%
  21. 21 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 22.4%

Source: Official ABC Bench Screening Evasion leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.9% max Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.1 Pro (Feb 26' Preview) 77.8% high Official leaderboard
3 Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B 71.4% xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GLM-5.2 70.4% max Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Kimi K3 69.1% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GLM-5.3 67.2% max Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Mistral Large 4 66.7% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Kimi K2.6 62.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Inkling-Small 60.2% xhigh Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen3.6 27B 57.2% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 56.7% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Beam 1.0 56% max Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Inkling 55.9% xhigh Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B 55.4% Official leaderboard
15 Gemini 3 Pro (Nov '25 Preview) 55.1% high Official leaderboard
16 Qwen 3.8 27B 53.9% xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Gemma 4 31B IT 51.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 47% Official leaderboard
19 Kimi K2.5 43.5% Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Claude Sonnet 4 39.2% 16k May 2025 Official leaderboard
21 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 22.4% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard

4 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in June 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Moonshot AI Z.ai Qwen
Own leaderboard 4 leaders

Source: Official ABC Bench Screening Evasion leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K3.1 Pro Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B Kimi K2.6 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B Kimi K2.5 Claude Sonnet 4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K3.1 Pro Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

Source: Official ABC Bench Screening Evasion leaderboard

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 23, 2026 Muse Spark 1.3 system card 47.6 ABC Bench Screening Evasion score, Muse Spark 1.3 (API), refusals excluded (Table 1, Figure 3) Bio and chem risk
Oct 12, 2026 Muse Wonder Full model card ABC Bench Screening Evasion, no score printed because of a high refusal rate (CBRN Capability Evaluations table, section 4) Bio and chem risk
Jul 9, 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 system card 63.2 ABC Bench (Screening Evasion), Muse Spark 1.1 Helpful (Table 1, Figure 4) Bio and chem risk

More in Biology and chemistry

All 109 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
  • MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
  • ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%