ABC Bench Screening Evasion
Agents complete a computational task on nucleic-acid synthesis screening. One task family of the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark.
Many labs refuse these prompts, so comparison columns are sparse.
- Made by
- SecureBio
- Released
- June 2026
- Kind
- Hazardous knowledge
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Strongest model tested
- Kimi K3.1 Pro #16 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly acquiring capabilities relevant to biological research, from literature synthesis to interpretation of experimental data. Increasingly, LLM agents can also perform in silico biology tasks that previously required experienced human biologists. These emerging AI capabilities offer new opportunities for scientific discovery and biomedical advances, but they also shift the landscape of biosecurity risks. To address this, we introduce the Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark (ABC-Bench), a suite of tasks to measure agentic biosecurity-relevant capabilities. ABC-Bench evaluates LLM agents on both benign and dual-use biology tasks: writing code to operate liquid handling robots, designing DNA fragments for in vitro assembly, and evading DNA synthesis screening. These tasks require a combination of biology and software expertise. All tested LLM agents outperformed the median expert human baseliner on all three tasks. Agents performed highly on tasks drawing on published knowledge and well-documented protocols, and more weakly on a task requiring novel bioinformatics reasoning. In three wet-lab validation experiments, we found that OpenAI's o4-mini-high produced scripts that, when run on an OpenTrons liquid handling robot, successfully assembled DNA with expected sequences.
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads with 82.9%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 82.9 Kimi K3.1 Pro
- 77.8 Gemini 3.1 Pro (Feb 26' Preview)
- 71.4
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B
- 70.4 GLM-5.2
- 69.1 Kimi K3
- 67.2 GLM-5.3
- 66.7
Mistral Large 4
- 62.5 Kimi K2.6
- 60.2
Inkling-Small
- 57.2
Qwen3.6 27B
- 56.7
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 56.0 Beam 1.0
- 55.9
Inkling
- 55.4 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- 55.1 Gemini 3 Pro (Nov '25 Preview)
- 53.9
Qwen 3.8 27B
- 51.5
Gemma 4 31B IT
- 47.0 Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- 43.5 Kimi K2.5
- 39.2 Claude Sonnet 4
- 22.4
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B
- 1 Kimi K3.1 Pro max 82.9%
- 2 Gemini 3.1 Pro (Feb 26' Preview) high 77.8%
- 3
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B xhigh 71.4%
- 4 GLM-5.2 max 70.4%
- 5 Kimi K3 max 69.1%
- 6 GLM-5.3 max 67.2%
- 7
Mistral Large 4 high 66.7%
- 8 Kimi K2.6 62.5%
- 9
Inkling-Small xhigh 60.2%
- 10
Qwen3.6 27B 57.2%
- 11
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 56.7%
- 12 Beam 1.0 max 56%
- 13
Inkling xhigh 55.9%
- 14 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B 55.4%
- 15 Gemini 3 Pro (Nov '25 Preview) high 55.1%
- 16
Qwen 3.8 27B xhigh 53.9%
- 17
Gemma 4 31B IT 51.5%
- 18 Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 47%
- 19 Kimi K2.5 43.5%
- 20 Claude Sonnet 4 16k 39.2%
- 21
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 22.4%
Source: Official ABC Bench Screening Evasion leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 82.9% | max | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Feb 26' Preview) | 77.8% | high | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 71.4% | xhigh | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GLM-5.2 | 70.4% | max | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Kimi K3 | 69.1% | max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | GLM-5.3 | 67.2% | max | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 66.7% | high | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Kimi K2.6 | 62.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 60.2% | xhigh | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 57.2% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 56.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Beam 1.0 | 56% | max | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 55.9% | xhigh | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B | 55.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | Gemini 3 Pro (Nov '25 Preview) | 55.1% | high | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 53.9% | xhigh | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 51.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B | 47% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | Kimi K2.5 | 43.5% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 39.2% | 16k | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | | 22.4% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
4 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in June 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official ABC Bench Screening Evasion leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official ABC Bench Screening Evasion leaderboard
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
3 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | | 47.6 | ABC Bench Screening Evasion score, Muse Spark 1.3 (API), refusals excluded (Table 1, Figure 3) | Bio and chem risk |
| Oct 12, 2026 | | ABC Bench Screening Evasion, no score printed because of a high refusal rate (CBRN Capability Evaluations table, section 4) | Bio and chem risk | |
| Jul 9, 2026 | | 63.2 | ABC Bench (Screening Evasion), Muse Spark 1.1 Helpful (Table 1, Figure 4) | Bio and chem risk |
More in Biology and chemistry
- GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
- SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
- LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
- MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
- ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
- MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%