Benchmark Almanac

AdaExploreBench

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 70.3% leads since October 2026
Not in model cards

Language model agents explore environments with hidden rules, infer the rules from evidence and adapt when the rules change without notice.

It had 37 Hugging Face paper upvotes and 4 GitHub stars.

Released
October 2026
Kind
Puzzles and chess
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Sol #12 on the capability index
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in unfamiliar and evolving environments, requiring them to proactively explore, understand, and adapt to environmental dynamics. However, existing benchmarks rarely test whether agents can proactively discover how an environment works and adapt as it evolves. To address this gap, we introduce AdaExploreBench, a benchmark for proactive exploration and test-time adaptation in evolving environments. By instantiating environmental dynamics as hidden rules, AdaExploreBench requires agents to actively acquire evidence and infer the rules. Under implicit rule drift, the latent rule changes without announcement, requiring agents to detect from degraded performance that prior knowledge is stale and re-explore. Experiments on eight leading LLMs show that proactive and adaptive exploration remain challenging: GPT-6 Sol achieves only 61.9% calibrated accuracy, while providing sufficient evidence or removing rule drift improves average performance significantly by close to 10%. These results reveal a critical bottleneck in current LLM agents: they can often reason effectively from informative evidence once it is available, but struggle to actively acquire the right evidence and recognize when previously acquired evidence is no longer valid.

Abstract of AdaExploreBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Proactive Exploration and Test-time Adaptation in Evolving Environments (arXiv:2610.25950, CC0)
8
Models scored on its own leaderboard

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads with 70.3% among models released by September 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Evidence Given 70.3%
  2. 2 Gemini 3.8 Flash Default 67.3%
  3. 3 GPT-6 Sol Evidence Given 66.6%
  4. 4 GPT-6 Luna Evidence Given 51.5%
  5. 5 Qwen 3.8 27B Stationary 50.6%
  6. 6 Gemma 4 12B Evidence Given 36.5%
  7. 7 Qwen3.5-9B Evidence Given 28.2%
  8. 8 Llama 3.1-8B Evidence Given 13.8%

Source: Official AdaExploreBench leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 70.3% Evidence Given Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.8 Flash 67.3% Default Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Sol 66.6% Evidence Given Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-6 Luna 51.5% Evidence Given Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen 3.8 27B 50.6% Stationary Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Gemma 4 12B 36.5% Evidence Given Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen3.5-9B 28.2% Evidence Given Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Llama 3.1-8B 13.8% Evidence Given Jul 2024 Official leaderboard

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Default Stationary
70.3%
GPT-6 Sol
Forced-Probe Default
66.6%
GPT-6 Luna
Forced-Probe Stationary Evidence Gi…
51.5%
Qwen 3.8 27B
Evidence Gi… Stationary
50.6%
Gemma 4 12B
Default Evidence Gi…
36.5%
Qwen3.5-9B
Default Evidence Gi…
28.2%
Llama 3.1-8B
Forced-Probe Evidence Gi…
13.8%

Source: Official AdaExploreBench leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Evidence Given 70.3%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Stationary 67.6%
Gemini 3.8 Flash Default 67.3%
GPT-6 Sol Evidence Given 66.6%
GPT-6 Sol Default 61.9%
GPT-6 Sol Forced-Probe 54%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Forced-Probe 53.3%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Default 52.9%
GPT-6 Luna Evidence Given 51.5%
Qwen 3.8 27B Stationary 50.6%
GPT-6 Luna Stationary 41.1%
Qwen 3.8 27B Forced-Probe 38.7%
Qwen 3.8 27B Default 37.7%
Gemma 4 12B Evidence Given 36.5%
GPT-6 Luna Default 35.1%
Qwen 3.8 27B Evidence Given 33.8%
GPT-6 Luna Forced-Probe 32.3%
Qwen3.5-9B Evidence Given 28.2%
Gemma 4 12B Stationary 22.8%
Gemma 4 12B Forced-Probe 22%
Gemma 4 12B Default 20.6%
Qwen3.5-9B Forced-Probe 14.3%
Llama 3.1-8B Evidence Given 13.8%
Qwen3.5-9B Stationary 12.4%
Qwen3.5-9B Default 12.3%
Llama 3.1-8B Stationary 8.74%
Llama 3.1-8B Default 8.13%
Llama 3.1-8B Forced-Probe 4.07%

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

DeepSeek
Own leaderboard 1 leader

Source: Official AdaExploreBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Qwen 3.8 27B Gemma 4 12B Qwen3.5-9B Llama 3.1-8B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Qwen 3.8 27B

Source: Official AdaExploreBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Games and long tasks

All 82 in Games and long tasks
  • ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
  • Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Each game scores in-game progress or outcomes, and the board ranks models by their average rank across the games. Gemini 2.5 Pro 3.90
  • MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks. Seed2.0 Pro 49%
  • TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. The score is harmful actions per 100 steps, where lower is better. The board also reports game progress. Llama 4 Scout 7.00
  • GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8%
  • Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%