Benchmark Almanac

AgenticVBench

GPT-5.6 Sol 38.4% leads since July 2026
GPT-5.6 Sol 38.4% leads since July 2026
In use

Agents complete 100 video post-production tasks in 4 task families built from real workflows by 20 industry experts. Programmatic verifiers and expert rubrics score the results.

Tasks need text, image, audio and video understanding plus tool use. Qwen runs it with Claude Code.

Released
May 2026
Kind
Video generation
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Agent task
Strongest model tested
Claude Fable 5 #11 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Video production workflows offer a rich and demanding arena for evaluating multimodal AI agents: they require composite capabilities across text, image, audio, and video understanding, along with long-horizon planning, and tool use. To this end, we introduce AgenticVBench, a benchmark of 100 agentic tasks across 4 task families spanning the real world post-production workflow, constructed from real production workflows contributed by 20 industry experts averaging 6 years of professional experience. Tasks are paired with evaluation specifications that combine programmatic verifiers and expert rubrics. We evaluate frontier vision-language models (VLMs) with both vendor-native and open-source harnesses. The best evaluated agent stack barely crosses 30%, far below human expert performance on the same tasks. We further find that the choice of harness substantially affects model behavior, including scores, tool-use patterns, and failure modes. AgenticVBench provides a foundation for diagnosing and improving both models and harnesses for agentic video production. Benchmark website: https://agenticvbench.com.

Abstract of AgenticVBench: Can AI Agents Complete Real-World Post-Production Tasks? (arXiv:2605.27705, CC0)
10
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 38.4% among models released by July 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 38.4%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.6 Sol 38.4%
  2. 2 Claude Fable 5 32.4%
  3. 3 GPT-5.5 31%
  4. 4 Gemini 3.1 Pro 23.8%
  5. 5 MiniMax-M3 22.7%
  6. 6 Claude Opus 4.7 22.1%
  7. 7 Gemini 3 Flash 17.5%
  8. 8 Claude Sonnet 4.6 16.6%
  9. 9 GPT-5.4 Mini 14.5%
  10. 10 Qwen3-VL-235B OSS 3.30%

Source: Official AgenticVBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.6 Sol 38.4% Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Fable 5 32.4% Claude Code Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.5 31% Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3.1 Pro 23.8% OpenCode Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
5 MiniMax-M3 22.7% OpenCode Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Opus 4.7 22.1% Claude Code Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 3 Flash 17.5% OpenCode Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Claude Sonnet 4.6 16.6% Claude Code Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.4 Mini 14.5% Codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen3-VL-235B OSS 3.30% OpenClaw May 2026 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.6 Sol 38.4% Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 36.8% Sep 2026 Lab model card
3 Claude Fable 5 32.4% Claude Code Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.5 31% Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 3.1 Pro 23.8% OpenCode Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 MiniMax-M3 22.7% OpenCode Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Claude Opus 4.7 22.1% Claude Code Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 3 Flash 17.5% OpenCode Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Sonnet 4.6 16.6% Claude Code Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-5.4 Mini 14.5% Codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in May 2026 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2026
GPT-5.6 Sol 38.4%

Source: Official AgenticVBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.6 Sol Claude Fable 5 Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3 Flash 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.5

Sources: Official AgenticVBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 36.8 AgenticVBench Multimodal tool use (Claude Code)

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 22, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 36.8 AgenticVBench, Claude Code (Table 6) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%