Benchmark Almanac

AIR-Bench (Audio Instruction Benchmark)

Only in system cards

Audio language models answer questions about speech, natural sounds and music. A foundation set has 19 tasks with about 19k single-choice questions, and a chat set has 2k open-ended questions scored by GPT-4.

Models report the chat set as a GPT-4 judge score from 1 to 10. Not the AI risk benchmark AIR-Bench 2024.

Released
February 2024
Kind
Audio understanding and voice
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
March 2025
Last model added
March 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Recently, instruction-following audio-language models have received broad attention for human-audio interaction. However, the absence of benchmarks capable of evaluating audio-centric interaction capabilities has impeded advancements in this field. Previous models primarily focus on assessing different fundamental tasks, such as Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), and lack an assessment of the open-ended generative capabilities centered around audio. Thus, it is challenging to track the progression in the Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) domain and to provide guidance for future improvement. In this paper, we introduce AIR-Bench (Audio InstRuction Benchmark), the first benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of LALMs to understand various types of audio signals (including human speech, natural sounds, and music), and furthermore, to interact with humans in the textual format. AIR-Bench encompasses two dimensions: foundation and chat benchmarks. The former consists of 19 tasks with approximately 19k single-choice questions, intending to inspect the basic single-task ability of LALMs. The latter one contains 2k instances of open-ended question-and-answer data, directly assessing the comprehension of the model on complex audio and its capacity to follow instructions. Both benchmarks require the model to generate hypotheses directly. We design a unified framework that leverages advanced language models, such as GPT-4, to evaluate the scores of generated hypotheses given the meta-information of the audio. Experimental results demonstrate a high level of consistency between GPT-4-based evaluation and human evaluation. By revealing the limitations of existing LALMs through evaluation results, AIR-Bench can provide insights into the direction of future research.

Abstract of AIR-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models via Generative Comprehension (arXiv:2402.07729, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Phi-4-multimodal leads with 6.98

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct leads with 6.93 across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Phi-4-multimodal leads with 6.98, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 Phi-4-multimodal 6.98

Source: Labs’ model cards

Source: Official AIR-Bench (Audio Instruction Benchmark) leaderboard

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official AIR-Bench (Audio Instruction Benchmark) leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Phi-4-multimodal 6.98 Mar 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct 6.93 Chat Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Phi-4-multimodal 6.98 Mar 2025 Lab model card
2 Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct 6.93 Chat Aug 2024 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 11 entries, 1 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
6.94 6.96 6.98 2025 6.94 6.96 6.98 2025

Sources: Official AIR-Bench (Audio Instruction Benchmark) leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 3, 2025 Phi-4-multimodal technical report 6.98 AirBench-chat, GPT-4 judge score 1 to 10 (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%