Benchmark Almanac

Full-Duplex-Bench v1.5

Full-duplex speech models are tested on overlap scenarios: listener backchannel, side conversation and ambient speech. Metrics cover how the model yields, continues or responds.

Uses the same offline server-client pipeline as v1.0 with new overlap data released in 2025-08.

Released
July 2025
Kind
Speech recognition and translation
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
July 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
July 2026

In the authors’ words

Full-duplex spoken dialogue systems promise to transform human-machine interaction from a rigid, turn-based protocol into a fluid, natural conversation. However, the central challenge to realizing this vision, managing overlapping speech, remains critically under-evaluated. We introduce Full-Duplex-Bench v1.5, the first fully automated benchmark designed to systematically probe how models behave during speech overlap. The benchmark simulates four representative overlap scenarios: user interruption, user backchannel, talking to others, and background speech. Our framework, compatible with open-source and commercial API-based models, provides a comprehensive suite of metrics analyzing categorical dialogue behaviors, stop and response latency, and prosodic adaptation. Benchmarking five state-of-the-art agents reveals two divergent strategies: a responsive approach prioritizing rapid response to user input, and a floor-holding approach that preserves conversational flow by filtering overlapping events. Our open-source framework enables practitioners to accelerate the development of robust full-duplex systems by providing the tools for reproducible evaluation.

Abstract of Full-Duplex-Bench v1.5: Evaluating Overlap Handling for Full-Duplex Speech Models (arXiv:2507.23159, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs

TML-Interaction-Small leads with 77.8

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 TML-Interaction-Small 77.8

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 TML-Interaction-Small 77.8 May 2026 Lab model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
77.8 2026 77.8 2026

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in July 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Thinking Machines
OpenAI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jul 8, 2026 GPT-Live-1 80.1 Full Duplex Bench v1.5 Interactivity, average score
May 11, 2026 TML-Interaction-Small 77.8 FD-bench v1.5 average quality, streaming audio

Versions

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%