GameHorizon
Models are tested on gameplay over several time horizons. Tasks combine visual understanding, instruction decomposition, planning and precise action control, using offline data instead of noisy rollouts.
Ships with training data. 70 upvotes on Hugging Face papers and 579 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- Tencent ARC
- Released
- September 2026
- Kind
- Video games
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Modern video games provide a measurable testbed for AI models, combining abilities of visual understanding, instruction decomposition, goal planning, and precise action control over multiple temporal horizons. Existing datasets and benchmarks, however, either cover a narrow range of games, lack language instructions, or rely on high-variance online rollouts. To address these challenges, we introduce GameHorizon, a unified data and evaluation suite that measures gameplay capabilities at different horizons for diverse model families. GameHorizon Suite consists of three components. First, GameHorizon-Annotator is a scalable and automated annotation pipeline for multi-horizon instructions. Second, utilizing the pipeline, we construct GameHorizon-Data, the first large-scale AAA gameplay dataset with temporally aligned videos, player actions, and multi-horizon instructions. It comprises 5,000 hours of recordings from 21 games, collected by 100 human expert players. Third, we build GameHorizon-Bench with reproducible offline and stepwise online testing. The offline track enables reproducible evaluation using thousands of standardized questions organized into three primary tasks and a series of diagnostic variants, while the online track tests whether offline scores reflect actual gameplay capabilities and localizes failures to specific steps within long-horizon gameplay. Based on our GameHorizon Suite, we evaluate 47 models through more than one million model invocations, revealing a meaningful hierarchy of task difficulty and pronounced differences in model capabilities. Our work can provide a standardized yardstick for evaluating gameplay capabilities across horizons and model families. We will release our dataset, annotator, and benchmark to facilitate future research.
GPT-6 Astra leads with 80.2 among models released by September 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 11 more
- 80.2 GPT-6 Astra
- 77.3
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 76.7
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 75.3
Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 74.8 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 74.5 Kimi K3
- 74.4
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 73.2 GPT-5.5
- 72.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 72.7
Doubao Seed 2.1 Turbo
- 72.1
Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro
- 71.4
Seed2.0 Pro
- 71.2 Claude Fable 5
- 70.7 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 68.7
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 68.5
Qwen 3.8 27B
- 67.8 Kimi K2.6
- 67.8 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 66.8
Doubao Seed 2.0 Lite
- 66.3
Gemma 4 31B IT
- 65.6
MiniMax-M3
- 65.2
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 64.8 Claude Opus 4.8
- 64.7 Claude Sonnet 5
- 64.1
Step 3.7 Flash
- 63.4
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 63.2 GLM-5V-Turbo
- 62.8 GPT-5.2
- 62.3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 61.4
BAGEL-7B-MoT
- 60.8
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 60.6
STEP3-VL-10B
- 58.3 SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT
- 57.5
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 57.3 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- 57.1 GELab-Zero-4B-Preview
- 56.7
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 55.8
InternVL3.5-8B
- 55.0 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 54.4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 53.0
UI-TARS-1.5
- 47.8 Ovis-U1-3B
- 46.0 InternVL3.5-2B
- 44.6 InternVL-U-4B
- 1 GPT-6 Astra offline 80.2
- 2
Gemini 3.8 Flash offline 77.3
- 3
Gemini 3.7 Flash offline 76.7
- 4
Gemini 3.6 Flash offline 75.3
- 5 GPT-5.6 Sol offline 74.8
- 6 Kimi K3 offline 74.5
- 7
Gemini 3.5 Flash offline 74.4
- 8 GPT-5.5 offline 73.2
- 9
Gemini 3.1 Pro offline 72.8
- 10
Doubao Seed 2.1 Turbo offline 72.7
- 11
Doubao Seed 2.1 Pro offline 72.1
- 12
Seed2.0 Pro offline 71.4
- 13 Claude Fable 5 offline 71.2
- 14 GPT-5.6 Terra offline 70.7
- 15
Qwen3.7-Plus offline 68.7
- 16
Qwen 3.8 27B offline 68.5
- 17 Kimi K2.6 offline 67.8
- 18 GPT-5.6 Luna offline 67.8
- 19
Doubao Seed 2.0 Lite Apr 2026, offline 66.8
- 20
Gemma 4 31B IT offline 66.3
- 21
MiniMax-M3 offline 65.6
- 22
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B offline 65.2
- 23 Claude Opus 4.8 offline 64.8
- 24 Claude Sonnet 5 offline 64.7
- 25
Step 3.7 Flash offline 64.1
- 26
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct offline 63.4
- 27 GLM-5V-Turbo offline 63.2
- 28 GPT-5.2 offline 62.8
- 29
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B offline 62.3
- 30
BAGEL-7B-MoT offline 61.4
- 31
Qwen2.5-VL-32B offline 60.8
- 32
STEP3-VL-10B offline 60.6
- 33 SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT offline 58.3
- 34
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B offline 57.5
- 35 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct offline 57.3
- 36 GELab-Zero-4B-Preview offline 57.1
- 37
Qwen2.5-VL-7B offline 56.7
- 38
InternVL3.5-8B offline 55.8
- 39 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking offline 55.0
- 40 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) offline 54.4
- 41
UI-TARS-1.5 offline 53.0
- 42 Ovis-U1-3B offline 47.8
- 43 InternVL3.5-2B offline 46.0
- 44 InternVL-U-4B offline 44.6
Source: Official GameHorizon leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 80.2 | offline | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 77.3 | offline | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 76.7 | offline | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 75.3 | offline | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 74.8 | offline | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Kimi K3 | 74.5 | offline | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 74.4 | offline | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-5.5 | 73.2 | offline | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 72.8 | offline | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 72.7 | offline | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 72.1 | offline | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 71.4 | offline | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Claude Fable 5 | 71.2 | offline | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 70.7 | offline | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 68.7 | offline | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 68.5 | offline | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | Kimi K2.6 | 67.8 | offline | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 67.8 | offline | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | | 66.8 | offline | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 66.3 | offline | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | | 65.6 | offline | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 65.2 | offline | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 64.8 | offline | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 64.7 | offline | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | | 64.1 | offline | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | | 63.4 | offline | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | GLM-5V-Turbo | 63.2 | offline | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | GPT-5.2 | 62.8 | offline | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | | 62.3 | offline | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | | 61.4 | offline | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | | 60.8 | offline | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 32 | | 60.6 | offline | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT | 58.3 | offline | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 57.5 | offline | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct | 57.3 | offline | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | GELab-Zero-4B-Preview | 57.1 | offline | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 56.7 | offline | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 38 | | 55.8 | offline | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 39 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 55.0 | offline | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 40 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 54.4 | offline | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 53.0 | offline | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 42 | Ovis-U1-3B | 47.8 | offline | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | InternVL3.5-2B | 46.0 | offline | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | InternVL-U-4B | 44.6 | offline | Official leaderboard |
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in September 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official GameHorizon leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official GameHorizon leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Games and long tasks
- ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
- Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Each game scores in-game progress or outcomes, and the board ranks models by their average rank across the games.
Gemini 2.5 Pro 3.90
- MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks.
Seed2.0 Pro 49%
- TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. The score is harmful actions per 100 steps, where lower is better. The board also reports game progress.
Llama 4 Scout 7.00
- GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8%
- Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%