InfographicVQA
Models answer about 30,000 questions on about 5,000 infographics that mix text, layout, charts, and graphics. Scoring is ANLS.
- Made by
- Computer Vision Center (UAB) and IIIT Hyderabad
- Released
- April 2021
- Kind
- Documents, charts and text in images
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Kimi K2.5 #75 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- August 2026
In the authors’ words
Infographics are documents designed to effectively communicate information using a combination of textual, graphical and visual elements. In this work, we explore the automatic understanding of infographic images by using Visual Question Answering technique.To this end, we present InfographicVQA, a new dataset that comprises a diverse collection of infographics along with natural language questions and answers annotations. The collected questions require methods to jointly reason over the document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations. We curate the dataset with emphasis on questions that require elementary reasoning and basic arithmetic skills. Finally, we evaluate two strong baselines based on state of the art multi-modal VQA models, and establish baseline performance for the new task. The dataset, code and leaderboard will be made available at http://docvqa.org
Kimi K2.5 leads with 92.6% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 92.6 Kimi K2.5
- 92.0
Gemma 4 31B IT
- 91.2
Seed1.5-VL
- 89.5
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 89.3
Gemma 4 26B A4B
- 88.0
Seed1.6-Thinking
- 87.3
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 86.8
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 82.9
Command A Vision
- 82.0
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 81.8
Cosmos3-Nano
- 81.0
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 80.4
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 80.3
Gemini 1.0 Ultra
- 77.4
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1
- 72.7
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 72.7
Phi-4-multimodal
- 70.6
Gemma 3 27B
- 70.2 LFM2.5-VL-3B
- 70.0
Gemma 4 E4B
- 65.2
North Micro Vision Instruct
- 64.9
Gemma 3 12B
- 63.9
Gemma 4 E2B
- 60.1
Cosmos3-Edge
- 58.7 LFM2-VL-1.6B
- 50.0
Gemma 3 4B
- 1 Kimi K2.5 92.6%
- 2
Gemma 4 31B IT 92%
- 3
Seed1.5-VL 91.2%
- 4
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 89.5%
- 5
Gemma 4 26B A4B 89.3%
- 6
Seed1.6-Thinking 88%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 87.3%
- 8
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 86.8%
- 9
Command A Vision 82.9%
- 10
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 82%
- 11
Cosmos3-Nano 81.8%
- 12
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 81%
- 13
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 80.4%
- 14
Gemini 1.0 Ultra 80.3%
- 15
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1 77.4%
- 16
Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 72.7%
- 17
Phi-4-multimodal 72.7%
- 18
Gemma 3 27B 70.6%
- 19 LFM2.5-VL-3B 70.2%
- 20
Gemma 4 E4B 70%
- 21
North Micro Vision Instruct 65.2%
- 22
Gemma 3 12B 64.9%
- 23
Gemma 4 E2B 63.9%
- 24
Cosmos3-Edge 60.1%
- 25 LFM2-VL-1.6B 58.7%
- 26
Gemma 3 4B 50%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimi K2.5 | 92.6% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 92% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 91.2% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 89.5% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 89.3% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 88% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 87.3% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 86.8% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 82.9% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 82% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 81.8% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 81% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 80.4% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 80.3% | Dec 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 77.4% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 72.7% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 72.7% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 70.6% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 70.2% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 70% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 65.2% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 64.9% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 63.9% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 60.1% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | LFM2-VL-1.6B | 58.7% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 50% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Qwen’s own number for Qwen2.5-VL-72B passed 85% in February 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 70.2 | InfographicVQA (val) |
| Aug 12, 2026 | 65.2 | InfoVQA VAL | |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 | 92.6 | InfoVQA (val) |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 89.5 | InfoVQA_TEST | |
| Aug 12, 2025 | LFM2-VL-1.6B | 58.7 | InfoVQA (Val) |
| Jul 31, 2025 | 82.9 | InfoVQA | |
| Jun 25, 2025 | 88 | Infographic VQA | |
| Jun 3, 2025 | 77.4 | InfoVQA Val | |
| May 12, 2025 | 91.2 | InfographicVQA | |
| Mar 12, 2025 | 70.6 | InfoVQA (IT); PT InfoVQA (val) = 59.4 | |
| Feb 26, 2025 | 72.7 | InfoVQA | |
| May 14, 2024 | 81 | InfographicVQA (test), 0-shot (ANLS) | |
| Feb 15, 2024 | 72.7 | InfographicVQA (test), 0-shot (ANLS) | |
| Dec 6, 2023 | 80.3 | InfographicVQA (test) | |
| Mar 14, 2023 | GPT-4 | 75.1 | Infographic VQA ANLS score (test) 0-shot (pixel-only) |
18 system cards report it, from 8 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | | 70 | InfographicVQA, max resolution, thinking (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | | 63.9 | InfographicVQA, max resolution, thinking (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | | 92 | InfographicVQA, thinking, max resolution (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | | 89.3 | InfographicVQA, thinking, max resolution (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| May 31, 2026 | | 81.8 | InfoVQA, Cosmos3-Nano 8B column, Table 10 | Capabilities |
| May 31, 2026 | | 60.1 | InfoVQA, Cosmos3-Edge 2B column, Table 10 | Capabilities |
| Apr 27, 2026 | | 86.8 | InfoVQA (Test), reasoning on, 83.6 reasoning off (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 92.6 | InfoVQA (test) (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Nov 28, 2025 | LFM2-VL-1.6B technical report | 58.4 | InfoVQA (val), LFM2-VL-1.6B (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 89.5 | InfoVQA test (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 6, 2025 | | 80.4 | InfoVQA (Test), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 79.4 | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 82 | InfoVQA (test) (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 91.2 | InfographicVQA, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 89.3 | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 50 | InfoVQA, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 70.6 | InfoVQA, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 64.9 | InfoVQA, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 3, 2025 | | 72.7 | InfoVQA (test) (Table 1). Speech-prompt ShareGPT4o InfoVQA 63.7 (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 87.3 | InfoVQA test (Table 5) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%