Benchmark Almanac

MMAR

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 80% leads since March 2026
Fading

Models answer 1,000 questions about real-world audio of speech, sound, music and their mixes. Questions span four reasoning layers from signal to cultural knowledge.

Repo has over 200 GitHub stars.

Released
May 2025
Kind
Audio understanding and voice
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
September 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
September 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce MMAR, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the deep reasoning capabilities of Audio-Language Models (ALMs) across massive multi-disciplinary tasks. MMAR comprises 1,000 meticulously curated audio-question-answer triplets, collected from real-world internet videos and refined through iterative error corrections and quality checks to ensure high quality. Unlike existing benchmarks that are limited to specific domains of sound, music, or speech, MMAR extends them to a broad spectrum of real-world audio scenarios, including mixed-modality combinations of sound, music, and speech. Each question in MMAR is hierarchically categorized across four reasoning layers: Signal, Perception, Semantic, and Cultural, with additional sub-categories within each layer to reflect task diversity and complexity. To further foster research in this area, we annotate every question with a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) rationale to promote future advancements in audio reasoning. Each item in the benchmark demands multi-step deep reasoning beyond surface-level understanding. Moreover, a part of the questions requires graduate-level perceptual and domain-specific knowledge, elevating the benchmark's difficulty and depth. We evaluate MMAR using a broad set of models, including Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs), Large Audio Reasoning Models (LARMs), Omni Language Models (OLMs), Large Language Models (LLMs), and Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), with audio caption inputs. The performance of these models on MMAR highlights the benchmark's challenging nature, and our analysis further reveals critical limitations of understanding and reasoning capabilities among current models. We hope MMAR will serve as a catalyst for future advances in this important but little-explored area.

Abstract of MMAR: A Challenging Benchmark for Deep Reasoning in Speech, Audio, Music, and Their Mix (arXiv:2505.13032, CC0)
4
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 80% among models released by September 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 80%
  2. 2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 79.8%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 74%
  4. 4 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 63.6%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 80% Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 79.8% Sep 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 74% Mar 2026 Lab model card
4 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 63.6% Sep 2025 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Xiaomi Corp Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in September 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 79.8 MMAR Audio Understanding
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 74 MMAR, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 80 MMAR

3 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 22, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 79.8 MMAR (Table 4) Capabilities
Apr 17, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 80 MMAR (Table 5) Capabilities
Sep 18, 2025 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct technical report 63.6 MMAR (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%