Benchmark Almanac

MMAU-Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro 72.2% leads since February 2026
Gemini 3.1 Pro 72.2% leads since February 2026
Fading

Models answer 5,305 expert-written questions about speech, sounds, music and their mixes, covering 49 listening skills. Some clips run up to 10 minutes.

A harder follow-up to MMAU from the same group. Some questions are open-ended rather than multiple choice.

Released
August 2025
Kind
Audio understanding and voice
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3.7 Flash #25 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
March 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Audio comprehension-including speech, non-speech sounds, and music-is essential for achieving human-level intelligence. Consequently, AI agents must demonstrate holistic audio understanding to qualify as generally intelligent. However, evaluating auditory intelligence comprehensively remains challenging. To address this gap, we introduce MMAU-Pro, the most comprehensive and rigorously curated benchmark for assessing audio intelligence in AI systems. MMAU-Pro contains 5,305 instances, where each instance has one or more audios paired with human expert-generated question-answer pairs, spanning speech, sound, music, and their combinations. Unlike existing benchmarks, MMAU-Pro evaluates auditory intelligence across 49 unique skills and multiple complex dimensions, including long-form audio comprehension, spatial audio reasoning, multi-audio understanding, among others. All questions are meticulously designed to require deliberate multi-hop reasoning, including both multiple-choice and open-ended response formats. Importantly, audio data is sourced directly “from the wild" rather than from existing datasets with known distributions. We evaluate 22 leading open-source and proprietary multimodal AI models, revealing significant limitations: even state-of-the-art models such as Gemini 2.5 Flash and Audio Flamingo 3 achieve only 59.2% and 51.7% accuracy, respectively, approaching random performance in multiple categories. Our extensive analysis highlights specific shortcomings and provides novel insights, offering actionable perspectives for the community to enhance future AI systems' progression toward audio general intelligence. The benchmark and code is available at https://sonalkum.github.io/mmau-pro.

Abstract of MMAU-Pro: A Challenging and Comprehensive Benchmark for Holistic Evaluation of Audio General Intelligence (arXiv:2508.13992, CC0)
31
Entries on its own leaderboard, 10 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 72.2% among models released by August 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 72.2%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3.1 Pro 72.2%
  2. 2 Gemini 3.7 Flash 70.4%
  3. 3 Gemini 3.6 Flash 69.6%
  4. 4 Gemini 3.5 Flash 68.5%
  5. 5 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct size=30B-A3B 62.9%
  6. 6 Gemini-2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 59.2%
  7. 7 gpt-audio 58.8%
  8. 8 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.7%
  9. 9 GPT4o-Audio 52.5%
  10. 10 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B size=10.7B 52.2%
  11. 11 Audio Flamingo 3 size=8.4B 51.7%
  12. 12 GPT4o-mini-Audio 48.3%
  13. 13 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct size=7B 48.3%
  14. 14 Ming-Lite-Omni-1.5 size=18.9B 47.4%
  15. 15 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B size=5.5B 46.1%
  16. 16 Audio Flamingo 2 size=3.2B 42.6%
  17. 17 DeSTA2.5-Audio size=8.8B 40.6%
  18. 18 Gemma 3n E4B size=7.5B 39.7%
  19. 19 SALMONN 13B size=13B 39.6%
  20. 20 Audio-Reasoner size=8.4B 39.5%
  21. 21 Phi4-MM size=5.5B 38.7%
  22. 22 DeSTA2 size=8.2B 36.7%
  23. 23 Gemma-3n-E2B-it size=5.1B 35.4%
  24. 24 Caption + GPT4o 35.3%
  25. 25 SALMONN 7B size=7B 34.5%
  26. 26 R1-AQA size=8.2B 34.1%
  27. 27 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 size=7B 33.9%
  28. 28 Captions + Qwen235B-A22B size=235B 33.7%
  29. 29 GAMA size=7.4B 33.2%
  30. 30 Mellow size=167M 27.5%
  31. 31 BAT size=7B 24.8%

Source: Official MMAU-Pro leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3.1 Pro 72.2% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.7 Flash 70.4% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3.6 Flash 69.6% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3.5 Flash 68.5% May 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct 62.9% size=30B-A3B Official leaderboard
6 Gemini-2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 59.2% Official leaderboard
7 gpt-audio 58.8% Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.7% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
9 GPT4o-Audio 52.5% Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 52.2% size=10.7B Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Audio Flamingo 3 51.7% size=8.4B Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
12 GPT4o-mini-Audio 48.3% Official leaderboard
13 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 48.3% size=7B Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Ming-Lite-Omni-1.5 47.4% size=18.9B Official leaderboard
15 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B 46.1% size=5.5B Official leaderboard
16 Audio Flamingo 2 42.6% size=3.2B Official leaderboard
17 DeSTA2.5-Audio 40.6% size=8.8B Official leaderboard
18 Gemma 3n E4B 39.7% size=7.5B Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
19 SALMONN 13B 39.6% size=13B Official leaderboard
20 Audio-Reasoner 39.5% size=8.4B Official leaderboard
21 Phi4-MM 38.7% size=5.5B Official leaderboard
22 DeSTA2 36.7% size=8.2B Official leaderboard
23 Gemma-3n-E2B-it 35.4% size=5.1B Official leaderboard
24 Caption + GPT4o 35.3% Official leaderboard
25 SALMONN 7B 34.5% size=7B Official leaderboard
26 R1-AQA 34.1% size=8.2B Official leaderboard
27 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 33.9% size=7B Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Captions + Qwen235B-A22B 33.7% size=235B Official leaderboard
29 GAMA 33.2% size=7.4B Official leaderboard
30 Mellow 27.5% size=167M Official leaderboard
31 BAT 24.8% size=7B Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3.1 Pro 72.2% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.7 Flash 70.4% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3.6 Flash 69.6% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
4 MiMo-V2-Omni 69.4% Mar 2026 Lab model card
5 Gemini 3.5 Flash 68.5% May 2026 Official leaderboard
6 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 56.8% Sep 2025 Lab model card
7 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.7% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 52.2% size=10.7B Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Audio Flamingo 3 51.7% size=8.4B Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 48.3% size=7B Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Gemma 3n E4B 39.7% size=7.5B Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 33.9% size=7B Jan 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2025 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in August 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind Xiaomi Corp
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2026
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni 69.4%

Sources: Official MMAU-Pro leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3.1 Pro MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct Gemini 2.0 Flash Baichuan-Omni-1.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3.1 Pro MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct

Sources: Official MMAU-Pro leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Xiaomi Corp
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Mar 18, 2026 MiMo-V2-Omni 69.4 MMAU-Pro
Sep 18, 2025 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 56.8 MMAU-Pro

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 18, 2025 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct technical report 53.4 MMAU-Pro (Table 8). The launch chart was read as 56.8 Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%