MMAU-Pro
Models answer 5,305 expert-written questions about speech, sounds, music and their mixes, covering 49 listening skills. Some clips run up to 10 minutes.
A harder follow-up to MMAU from the same group. Some questions are open-ended rather than multiple choice.
- Made by
- University of Maryland (GAMMA lab) and collaborators
- Released
- August 2025
- Kind
- Audio understanding and voice
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3.7 Flash #25 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- March 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Audio comprehension-including speech, non-speech sounds, and music-is essential for achieving human-level intelligence. Consequently, AI agents must demonstrate holistic audio understanding to qualify as generally intelligent. However, evaluating auditory intelligence comprehensively remains challenging. To address this gap, we introduce MMAU-Pro, the most comprehensive and rigorously curated benchmark for assessing audio intelligence in AI systems. MMAU-Pro contains 5,305 instances, where each instance has one or more audios paired with human expert-generated question-answer pairs, spanning speech, sound, music, and their combinations. Unlike existing benchmarks, MMAU-Pro evaluates auditory intelligence across 49 unique skills and multiple complex dimensions, including long-form audio comprehension, spatial audio reasoning, multi-audio understanding, among others. All questions are meticulously designed to require deliberate multi-hop reasoning, including both multiple-choice and open-ended response formats. Importantly, audio data is sourced directly “from the wild" rather than from existing datasets with known distributions. We evaluate 22 leading open-source and proprietary multimodal AI models, revealing significant limitations: even state-of-the-art models such as Gemini 2.5 Flash and Audio Flamingo 3 achieve only 59.2% and 51.7% accuracy, respectively, approaching random performance in multiple categories. Our extensive analysis highlights specific shortcomings and provides novel insights, offering actionable perspectives for the community to enhance future AI systems' progression toward audio general intelligence. The benchmark and code is available at https://sonalkum.github.io/mmau-pro.
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 72.2% among models released by August 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 72.2%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 72.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 70.4
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 69.6
Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 68.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 62.9 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- 59.2 Gemini-2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 58.8 gpt-audio
- 55.7
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 52.5 GPT4o-Audio
- 52.2
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 51.7
Audio Flamingo 3
- 48.3 GPT4o-mini-Audio
- 48.3 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct
- 47.4 Ming-Lite-Omni-1.5
- 46.1 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B
- 42.6 Audio Flamingo 2
- 40.6 DeSTA2.5-Audio
- 39.7
Gemma 3n E4B
- 39.6 SALMONN 13B
- 39.5 Audio-Reasoner
- 38.7 Phi4-MM
- 36.7 DeSTA2
- 35.4 Gemma-3n-E2B-it
- 35.3 Caption + GPT4o
- 34.5 SALMONN 7B
- 34.1 R1-AQA
- 33.9
Baichuan-Omni-1.5
- 33.7 Captions + Qwen235B-A22B
- 33.2 GAMA
- 27.5 Mellow
- 24.8 BAT
- 1
Gemini 3.1 Pro 72.2%
- 2
Gemini 3.7 Flash 70.4%
- 3
Gemini 3.6 Flash 69.6%
- 4
Gemini 3.5 Flash 68.5%
- 5 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct size=30B-A3B 62.9%
- 6 Gemini-2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) 59.2%
- 7 gpt-audio 58.8%
- 8
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.7%
- 9 GPT4o-Audio 52.5%
- 10
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B size=10.7B 52.2%
- 11
Audio Flamingo 3 size=8.4B 51.7%
- 12 GPT4o-mini-Audio 48.3%
- 13 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct size=7B 48.3%
- 14 Ming-Lite-Omni-1.5 size=18.9B 47.4%
- 15 Qwen2.5-Omni-3B size=5.5B 46.1%
- 16 Audio Flamingo 2 size=3.2B 42.6%
- 17 DeSTA2.5-Audio size=8.8B 40.6%
- 18
Gemma 3n E4B size=7.5B 39.7%
- 19 SALMONN 13B size=13B 39.6%
- 20 Audio-Reasoner size=8.4B 39.5%
- 21 Phi4-MM size=5.5B 38.7%
- 22 DeSTA2 size=8.2B 36.7%
- 23 Gemma-3n-E2B-it size=5.1B 35.4%
- 24 Caption + GPT4o 35.3%
- 25 SALMONN 7B size=7B 34.5%
- 26 R1-AQA size=8.2B 34.1%
- 27
Baichuan-Omni-1.5 size=7B 33.9%
- 28 Captions + Qwen235B-A22B size=235B 33.7%
- 29 GAMA size=7.4B 33.2%
- 30 Mellow size=167M 27.5%
- 31 BAT size=7B 24.8%
Source: Official MMAU-Pro leaderboard
- 1
Gemini 3.1 Pro 72.2%
- 2
Gemini 3.7 Flash 70.4%
- 3
Gemini 3.6 Flash 69.6%
- 4 MiMo-V2-Omni 69.4%
- 5
Gemini 3.5 Flash 68.5%
- 6 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 56.8%
- 7
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 55.7%
- 8
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B size=10.7B 52.2%
- 9
Audio Flamingo 3 size=8.4B 51.7%
- 10 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct size=7B 48.3%
- 11
Gemma 3n E4B size=7.5B 39.7%
- 12
Baichuan-Omni-1.5 size=7B 33.9%
Sources: Official MMAU-Pro leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 72.2% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 70.4% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 69.6% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 68.5% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct | 62.9% | size=30B-A3B | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Gemini-2.5 Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 59.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | gpt-audio | 58.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | | 55.7% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | GPT4o-Audio | 52.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 52.2% | size=10.7B | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 51.7% | size=8.4B | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | GPT4o-mini-Audio | 48.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct | 48.3% | size=7B | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | Ming-Lite-Omni-1.5 | 47.4% | size=18.9B | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Qwen2.5-Omni-3B | 46.1% | size=5.5B | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Audio Flamingo 2 | 42.6% | size=3.2B | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | DeSTA2.5-Audio | 40.6% | size=8.8B | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 39.7% | size=7.5B | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | SALMONN 13B | 39.6% | size=13B | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Audio-Reasoner | 39.5% | size=8.4B | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Phi4-MM | 38.7% | size=5.5B | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | DeSTA2 | 36.7% | size=8.2B | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | Gemma-3n-E2B-it | 35.4% | size=5.1B | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Caption + GPT4o | 35.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 25 | SALMONN 7B | 34.5% | size=7B | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | R1-AQA | 34.1% | size=8.2B | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 33.9% | size=7B | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | Captions + Qwen235B-A22B | 33.7% | size=235B | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | GAMA | 33.2% | size=7.4B | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | Mellow | 27.5% | size=167M | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | BAT | 24.8% | size=7B | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 72.2% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 70.4% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 69.6% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | MiMo-V2-Omni | 69.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 68.5% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct | 56.8% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 55.7% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 52.2% | size=10.7B | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 51.7% | size=8.4B | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct | 48.3% | size=7B | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 39.7% | size=7.5B | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 33.9% | size=7B | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2025 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in August 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official MMAU-Pro leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official MMAU-Pro leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026 | MiMo-V2-Omni | 69.4 | MMAU-Pro |
| Sep 18, 2025 | MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct | 56.8 | MMAU-Pro |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2025 | MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct technical report | 53.4 | MMAU-Pro (Table 8). The launch chart was read as 56.8 | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%