Benchmark Almanac

MME-RealWorld

Awaker2.5-VL 60.8% tops its leaderboard InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B 50% leads the models we track
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 65.1% leads since August 2025
Dropped

Models answer human-annotated multiple choice questions about high-resolution real-world images in scenarios such as remote sensing, autonomous driving, monitoring and OCR.

It has English and Chinese versions.

Released
August 2024
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-4o mini #177 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
November 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Comprehensive evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has recently garnered widespread attention in the research community. However, we observe that existing benchmarks present several common barriers that make it difficult to measure the significant challenges that models face in the real world, including: 1) small data scale leads to a large performance variance; 2) reliance on model-based annotations results in restricted data quality; 3) insufficient task difficulty, especially caused by the limited image resolution. To tackle these issues, we introduce MME-RealWorld. Specifically, we collect more than 300K images from public datasets and the Internet, filtering 13,366 high-quality images for annotation. This involves the efforts of professional 25 annotators and 7 experts in MLLMs, contributing to 29,429 question-answer pairs that cover 43 subtasks across 5 real-world scenarios, extremely challenging even for humans. As far as we know, MME-RealWorld is the largest manually annotated benchmark to date, featuring the highest resolution and a targeted focus on real-world applications. We further conduct a thorough evaluation involving 28 prominent MLLMs, such as GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Our results show that even the most advanced models struggle with our benchmarks, where none of them reach 60% accuracy. The challenges of perceiving high-resolution images and understanding complex real-world scenarios remain urgent issues to be addressed. The data and evaluation code are released at https://mme-realworld.github.io/ .

Abstract of MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans? (arXiv:2408.13257, CC0)
36
Entries on its own leaderboard, 11 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
4
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Awaker2.5-VL tops the leaderboard with 60.8%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B, at 50%.

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 65.1%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Awaker2.5-VL 60.8%
  2. 2 InternVL2.5 58.1%
  3. 3 LLaVA-OneVision 57.4%
  4. 4 Qwen2.5-VL 57.3%
  5. 5 Qwen2-VL 56.5%
  6. 6 Xiaosuan-2.0-VL 55.7%
  7. 7 InternVL2 53.5%
  8. 8 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 51.6%
  9. 9 InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B 50%
  10. 10 InternVL-Chat-V1-5 49.4%
  11. 11 Jiutian-FALCON 49.2%
  12. 12 VITA 47.5%
  13. 13 Mini-Gemini-34B-HD 45.9%
  14. 14 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 45.6%
  15. 15 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 45.2%
  16. 16 CogVLM2-llama3-Chat 44.6%
  17. 17 Cambrain-1-34B 44.1%
  18. 18 Cambrain-1-8B 42.7%
  19. 19 SliME-8B 39.6%
  20. 20 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 38.2%
  21. 21 GPT-4o mini 36.4%
  22. 22 Monkey 35.3%
  23. 23 mPLUG-DocOwl 1.5 32.7%
  24. 24 DeepSeek-VL 32.4%
  25. 25 SliME-13B 31.7%
  26. 26 Yi-VL-34B 31%
  27. 27 Mini-Gemini-7B-HD 30.3%
  28. 28 LLaVA-NeXT-LLama3-8B 30.2%
  29. 29 LLaVA-NeXT-Qwen-72B 28.7%
  30. 30 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 28%
  31. 31 ShareGPT4V-13B 27.8%
  32. 32 MiniGPT-v2 26.4%
  33. 33 ShareGPT4V-7B 26.3%
  34. 34 LLaVA1.5-7B 26.1%
  35. 35 Qwen-VL-Chat 21.1%
  36. 36 TextMonkey 17.8%

Source: Official MME-RealWorld leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Awaker2.5-VL 60.8% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
2 InternVL2.5 58.1% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
3 LLaVA-OneVision 57.4% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2.5-VL 57.3% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen2-VL 56.5% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Xiaosuan-2.0-VL 55.7% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
7 InternVL2 53.5% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 51.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
9 InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B 50% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
10 InternVL-Chat-V1-5 49.4% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Jiutian-FALCON 49.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
12 VITA 47.5% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Mini-Gemini-34B-HD 45.9% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
14 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 45.6% May 2024 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 45.2% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
16 CogVLM2-llama3-Chat 44.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Cambrain-1-34B 44.1% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
18 Cambrain-1-8B 42.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
19 SliME-8B 39.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 38.2% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
21 GPT-4o mini 36.4% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
22 Monkey 35.3% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
23 mPLUG-DocOwl 1.5 32.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
24 DeepSeek-VL 32.4% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
25 SliME-13B 31.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Yi-VL-34B 31% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
27 Mini-Gemini-7B-HD 30.3% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
28 LLaVA-NeXT-LLama3-8B 30.2% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
29 LLaVA-NeXT-Qwen-72B 28.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
30 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 28% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
31 ShareGPT4V-13B 27.8% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
32 MiniGPT-v2 26.4% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
33 ShareGPT4V-7B 26.3% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
34 LLaVA1.5-7B 26.1% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
35 Qwen-VL-Chat 21.1% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
36 TextMonkey 17.8% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 65.1% Aug 2025 Lab model card
2 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 63.2% Feb 2025 Lab model card
3 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 62.2% Nov 2025 Lab model card
4 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 61.6% Mar 2025 Lab model card
5 InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B 50% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
6 InternVL-Chat-V1-5 49.4% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
7 VITA 47.5% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
8 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 45.6% May 2024 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-4o mini 36.4% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Monkey 35.3% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
11 Yi-VL-34B 31% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
12 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 28% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
13 ShareGPT4V-13B 27.8% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
14 ShareGPT4V-7B 26.3% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen-VL-Chat 21.1% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in August 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Shanghai AI Lab Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2024
Lab claims Not tested since Nov 2025

Sources: Official MME-RealWorld leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B Qwen2.5-VL-72B InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B Monkey LLaVA-v1.5-13B Qwen-VL-Chat 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B

Sources: Official MME-RealWorld leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since August 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Shanghai AI Lab
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 65.1 MME-RealWorld (en)
Mar 27, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 61.6 MME-RealWorlden

4 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 6, 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 62.2 MME-RealWorld (EN), reasoning off only (Table 3) Capabilities
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 65.1 MME-RealWorld (en) (Table 2, Table 5) Capabilities
Mar 26, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 61.6 MME-RealWorld en (Table 5) Capabilities
Feb 19, 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 63.2 MME-RealWorld en (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%