MMOU
Models answer 20,000 questions about 11,877 long web videos, using sound, images and text together. Questions cover 13 skill categories.
At release the best closed model scored 64.2% and the best open model 46.8%. Microsoft's Mage-VL card reports the test-mini split.
- Made by
- NVIDIA and University of Maryland (Goel, Ghosh et al.)
- Released
- March 2026
- Kind
- Long videos
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- September 2026
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown strong performance in visual and audio understanding when evaluated in isolation. However, their ability to jointly reason over omni-modal (visual, audio, and textual) signals in long and complex videos remains largely unexplored. We introduce MMOU, a new benchmark designed to systematically evaluate multimodal understanding and reasoning under these challenging, real-world conditions. MMOU consists of 20,000 carefully curated questions paired with 11877 web-collected videos of varying length, spanning diverse domains and exhibiting rich, tightly coupled audio-visual content. The benchmark covers 13 fundamental skill categories, all of which require integrating evidence across modalities and time. All questions are manually annotated across multiple turns by professional annotators, ensuring high quality and reasoning fidelity. We evaluate 20+ state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary multimodal models on MMOU. The results expose substantial performance gaps: the best closed-source model achieves only 64.2% accuracy, while the strongest open-source model reaches just 46.8%. Our results highlight the challenges of long-form omni-modal understanding, revealing that current models frequently fail to apply even fundamental skills in long videos. Through detailed analysis, we further identify systematic failure modes and provide insights into where and why current models break.
Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 64.2%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is MiniCPM-o 4.5, at 46.8%.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 78.8%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) Best closed-source omni model 64.2%
- 2
MiniCPM-o 4.5 Best open-source omni model 46.8%
- 3 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct Open-source omni model 46%
- 4
Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct Vision-only baseline 44%
- 5 GPT-5.2 Text-only baseline 40.7%
- 6
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B Audio-only baseline 35.6%
- 7
Audio Flamingo 3 Audio-only baseline 17.7%
Source: Official MMOU leaderboard
- 1
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 78.8%
- 2
MiniCPM-o 4.5 Best open-source omni model 46.8%
- 3
Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct Vision-only baseline 44%
- 4 GPT-5.2 Text-only baseline 40.7%
- 5
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B Audio-only baseline 35.6%
- 6
Audio Flamingo 3 Audio-only baseline 17.7%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official MMOU leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 64.2% | Best closed-source omni model | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 46.8% | Best open-source omni model | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct | 46% | Open-source omni model | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 44% | Vision-only baseline | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-5.2 | 40.7% | Text-only baseline | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 35.6% | Audio-only baseline | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 17.7% | Audio-only baseline | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 78.8% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 46.8% | Best open-source omni model | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 44% | Vision-only baseline | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-5.2 | 40.7% | Text-only baseline | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 35.6% | Audio-only baseline | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 17.7% | Audio-only baseline | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official MMOU leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official MMOU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 78.8 | MMOU (Table 5) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%