Benchmark Almanac

MotionBench

Seed2.0 Pro 75.2% leads since February 2026
Gemini 3 Pro 70.4% leads since November 2025
Seed2.0 Pro 75.2% leads since February 2026
Fading

Models answer questions about fine-grained motion in video clips across six motion question types. Scoring is accuracy.

Test answers are hidden and scored through the leaderboard, while the dev set has public answers.

Released
January 2025
Kind
Video understanding
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
April 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
June 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

In recent years, vision language models (VLMs) have made significant advancements in video understanding. However, a crucial capability - fine-grained motion comprehension - remains under-explored in current benchmarks. To address this gap, we propose MotionBench, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark designed to assess the fine-grained motion comprehension of video understanding models. MotionBench evaluates models' motion-level perception through six primary categories of motion-oriented question types and includes data collected from diverse sources, ensuring a broad representation of real-world video content. Experimental results reveal that existing VLMs perform poorly in understanding fine-grained motions. To enhance VLM's ability to perceive fine-grained motion within a limited sequence length of LLM, we conduct extensive experiments reviewing VLM architectures optimized for video feature compression and propose a novel and efficient Through-Encoder (TE) Fusion method. Experiments show that higher frame rate inputs and TE Fusion yield improvements in motion understanding, yet there is still substantial room for enhancement. Our benchmark aims to guide and motivate the development of more capable video understanding models, emphasizing the importance of fine-grained motion comprehension. Project page: https://motion-bench.github.io .

Abstract of MotionBench: Benchmarking and Improving Fine-grained Video Motion Understanding for Vision Language Models (arXiv:2501.02955, CC0)
9
Models scored in lab cards
7
Launch posts list it, from 3 labs
8
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Seed2.0 Pro leads with 75.2% among models released by June 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 70.4% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Seed2.0 Pro leads with 75.2%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in June 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.0 Pro 75.2%
  2. 2 Seed2.1 Pro 74.9%
  3. 3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 72.4%
  4. 4 Seed1.8 70.6%
  5. 5 Kimi K2.5 70.4%
  6. 6 Seed1.5-VL 68.4%
  7. 7 GLM-4.6V 63.6%
  8. 8 GLM-4.5V 62.4%
  9. 9 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Pro 75.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.1 Pro 74.9% Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 72.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
4 Seed1.8 70.6% Dec 2025 Lab model card
5 Kimi K2.5 70.4% Jan 2026 Lab model card
6 Seed1.5-VL 68.4% May 2025 Lab model card
7 GLM-4.6V 63.6% Jan 2026 Lab model card
8 GLM-4.5V 62.4% Aug 2025 Lab model card
9 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59% Jul 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 70.4% frames: - Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.1 66.2% frames: - Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.5 65.9% frames: - Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 GLM-4.5V 62.4% frames: 2fps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 61.1% frames: - Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
6 InternVL2_5-78B 61% frames: 16 Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Seed1.5-VL 59.4% frames: 2fps May 2025 Official leaderboard
8 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59.4% frames: 2fps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5 Chat 59.4% frames: 2fps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 56.1% frames: 64 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
11 InternVL2-40B 54% frames: 16 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
12 MiniCPM-V-2_6 53% frames: 64 Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Pro 75.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.1 Pro 74.9% Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 72.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
4 Seed1.8 70.6% Dec 2025 Lab model card
5 Gemini 3 Pro 70.4% frames: - Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Kimi K2.5 70.4% Jan 2026 Lab model card
7 Seed1.5-VL 68.4% May 2025 Lab model card
8 GPT-5.1 66.2% frames: - Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Opus 4.5 65.9% frames: - Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
10 GLM-4.6V 63.6% Jan 2026 Lab model card
11 GLM-4.5V 62.4% Aug 2025 Lab model card
12 Claude Sonnet 4.5 61.1% frames: - Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
13 InternVL2_5-78B 61% frames: 16 Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
14 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59.4% frames: 2fps Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-5 Chat 59.4% frames: 2fps Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 56.1% frames: 64 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
17 InternVL2-40B 54% frames: 16 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
18 MiniCPM-V-2_6 53% frames: 64 Aug 2024 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 24 entries, 12 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in January 2025 4 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in January 2025 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in January 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Shanghai AI Lab Z.ai OpenAI Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2025
Gemini 3 Pro 70.4%
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026
Seed2.0 Pro 75.2%

Sources: Official MotionBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8 Seed1.5-VL InternVL2_5-78B InternVL2-40B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.5-VL

Sources: Official MotionBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Z.ai
Moonshot AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 28, 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 72.4 MotionBench
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 75.2 MotionBench
Jan 27, 2026 Kimi K2.5 70.4 MotionBench
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 70.6 MotionBench
Aug 11, 2025 GLM-4.5V 62.4 MotionBench
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59 MotionBench
May 12, 2025 Seed1.5-VL 68.4 MotionBench

8 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 74.9 MotionBench (Table 10) Capabilities
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 70.6 MotionBench (Table 3) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 75.2 MotionBench (Table 9) Capabilities
Jan 30, 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 70.4 MotionBench (Table 4) Capabilities
Jan 1, 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 63.6 MotionBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Aug 13, 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 62.4 MotionBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 59 MotionBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
May 11, 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 68.4 MotionBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 68.4 Capabilities

The lab's number comes out ahead in 1 of 2 pairs that differ

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Seed1.5-VL 68.4% MotionBench 59.4% Leaderboard, frames: 2fps +9.0 pts
GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59% MotionBench 59.4% Leaderboard, frames: 2fps −0.4 pts
GLM-4.5V 62.4% MotionBench 62.4% Leaderboard, frames: 2fps Same

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%