MRCR (Michelangelo, original)
Models retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation. Original Michelangelo version before MRCR v2.
Google reports from 2024 and early 2025 use this version. Later Google cards use the 8-needle MRCR v2.
- Made by
- Google DeepMind
- Released
- September 2024
- Kind
- Finding facts in long inputs
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 #103 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- April 2025, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- April 2025
In the authors’ words
We introduce Michelangelo: a minimal, synthetic, and unleaked long-context reasoning evaluation for large language models which is also easy to automatically score. This evaluation is derived via a novel, unifying framework for evaluations over arbitrarily long contexts which measure the model's ability to do more than retrieve a single piece of information from its context. The central idea of the Latent Structure Queries framework (LSQ) is to construct tasks which require a model to “chisel away” the irrelevant information in the context, revealing a latent structure in the context. To verify a model's understanding of this latent structure, we query the model for details of the structure. Using LSQ, we produce three diagnostic long-context evaluations across code and natural-language domains intended to provide a stronger signal of long-context language model capabilities. We perform evaluations on several state-of-the-art models and demonstrate both that a) the proposed evaluations are high-signal and b) that there is significant room for improvement in synthesizing long-context information.
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 94.5% among models released by April 2025
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 94.5%
- 2
Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 84.6%
- 3
Gemini 2.0 Pro 74.7%
- 4
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 70.5%
- 5
Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 69.2%
- 6
Gemma 3 27B 59.3%
- 7
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 58%
- 8
Gemma 3 12B 49.8%
- 9
Gemma 3 4B 44.6%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 94.5% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 84.6% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 74.7% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 70.5% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 69.2% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 59.3% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 58% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 49.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 44.6% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in September 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Google DeepMind’s own number for Gemini 2.5 Pro passed 85% in March 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Labs dropped it from launch posts once the best score passed 85%
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2025 | 84.6 | MRCR 128k (average) (1M pointwise 66.3) | |
| Mar 25, 2025 | 94.5 | Best of MRCR, 128k (average) / MRCR, 1M (pointwise) | |
| Feb 5, 2025 | 58 | MRCR (1M) | |
| Feb 5, 2025 | 70.5 | MRCR (1M) | |
| Feb 5, 2025 | 74.7 | MRCR (1M) | |
| Dec 11, 2024 | 69.2 | MRCR (1M) |
7 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2025 | | 84.6 | MRCR (original), 128k (average), 1M (pointwise) 66.3 (Table, p.4) | Capabilities |
| Apr 28, 2025 | | 94.5 | MRCR (original), 128k average; 1M pointwise = 83.1% (Table, p.4, column Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 03-25) | Capabilities |
| Apr 15, 2025 | | 70.5 | MRCR (1M) (Table, p.3, column Gemini 2.0 Flash (GA)) | Capabilities |
| Apr 10, 2025 | | 58 | MRCR (1M) (Table, p.3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 44.6 | MRCR 128K, IT (Table 15). MRCR 32K IT: 49.8 | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 59.3 | MRCR 128K, IT (Table 15). MRCR 32K IT: 63.2 | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 49.8 | MRCR 128K, IT (Table 15). MRCR 32K IT: 53.7 | Capabilities |
Versions
More in Long context
- LongBench v2 In use 503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy.
Inkling 2 Small 70.6%
- GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 99.96%
- OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin.
Gemini 3.7 Flash 89%
- CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
- AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key.
Step 5 Preview 88.3%
- LOCA-Bench In use Agentic tasks whose environment state is scaled to grow context length while task semantics stay fixed. Success rate versus context length. GPT-5.2 21.3%