OccuBench
Agents do 100 professional task scenarios across 10 industries and 65 domains. Language world models simulate each domain's tools so tasks stay solvable.
69 HF paper upvotes.
- Made by
- Qwen (Alibaba)
- Released
- April 2026
- Kind
- Tasks from real jobs
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Opus 4.6 #37 on the capability index
- Last model added
- March 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
AI agents are expected to perform professional work across hundreds of occupational domains (from emergency department triage to nuclear reactor safety monitoring to customs import processing), yet existing benchmarks can only evaluate agents in the few domains where public environments exist. We introduce OccuBench, a benchmark covering 100 real-world professional task scenarios across 10 industry categories and 65 specialized domains, enabled by Language Environment Simulators (LESs) that simulate domain-specific environments through LLM-driven tool response generation. Our multi-agent synthesis pipeline automatically produces evaluation instances with guaranteed solvability, calibrated difficulty, and document-grounded diversity. OccuBench evaluates agents along two complementary dimensions: task completion across professional domains and environmental robustness under controlled fault injection (explicit errors, implicit data degradation, and mixed faults). We evaluate 15 frontier models across 8 model families and find that: (1) no single model dominates all industries, as each has a distinct occupational capability profile; (2) implicit faults (truncated data, missing fields) are harder than both explicit errors (timeouts, 500s) and mixed faults, because they lack overt error signals and require the agent to independently detect data degradation; (3) larger models, newer generations, and higher reasoning effort consistently improve performance. GPT-5.2 improves by 27.5 points from minimal to maximum reasoning effort; and (4) strong agents are not necessarily strong environment simulators. Simulator quality is critical for LES-based evaluation reliability. OccuBench provides the first systematic cross-industry evaluation of AI agents on professional occupational tasks.
GPT-5.2 leads with 79.6% among models released by March 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 GPT-5.2 E0 clean environment 79.6%
- 2
Gemini 3.1 Pro E1 robustness environment 73.3%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.6 E0 clean environment 71.5%
- 4
Qwen3.5-Plus E0 clean environment 69.9%
- 5
DeepSeek-V3.2 E0 clean environment 69.6%
- 6 Claude Opus 4.5 E0 clean environment 65.2%
- 7 Claude Sonnet 4.5 E0 clean environment 64.9%
- 8 Claude Sonnet 4.6 E0 clean environment 64.4%
- 9 Kimi K2.5 E0 clean environment 64.1%
- 10 GLM-5 E0 clean environment 62.6%
- 11 Gemini 3.1 FL E0 clean environment 61.3%
- 12 Claude Opus 4 E0 clean environment 61.3%
- 13
Qwen3.5-Flash E0 clean environment 59.7%
- 14
MiniMax-M2.7 E0 clean environment 53.9%
- 15 Claude Sonnet 4 E0 clean environment 53.4%
Source: Official OccuBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 | 79.6% | E0 clean environment | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 73.3% | E1 robustness environment | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 71.5% | E0 clean environment | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 69.9% | E0 clean environment | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 69.6% | E0 clean environment | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 65.2% | E0 clean environment | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 64.9% | E0 clean environment | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 64.4% | E0 clean environment | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Kimi K2.5 | 64.1% | E0 clean environment | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | GLM-5 | 62.6% | E0 clean environment | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Gemini 3.1 FL | 61.3% | E0 clean environment | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Claude Opus 4 | 61.3% | E0 clean environment | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 59.7% | E0 clean environment | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 53.9% | E0 clean environment | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 53.4% | E0 clean environment | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official OccuBench leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.2 | E0 clean environment | 79.6% | |||
| GPT-5.2 | E1 robustness environment | 75.9% | |||
| | E1 robustness environment | 73.3% | |||
| | E0 clean environment | 72.3% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | E0 clean environment | 71.5% | |||
| GPT-5.2 | E2 robustness environment | 70.4% | |||
| | E0 clean environment | 69.9% | |||
| | E0 clean environment | 69.6% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | E1 robustness environment | 68.1% | |||
| GPT-5.2 | E3 robustness environment | 67% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | E0 clean environment | 65.2% | |||
| | E3 robustness environment | 65.2% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | E0 clean environment | 64.9% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | E0 clean environment | 64.4% | |||
| Kimi K2.5 | E0 clean environment | 64.1% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | E3 robustness environment | 63.9% | |||
| | E2 robustness environment | 63.1% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | E1 robustness environment | 62.8% | |||
| GLM-5 | E0 clean environment | 62.6% | |||
| Claude Opus 4 | E0 clean environment | 61.3% | |||
| | E1 robustness environment | 61% | |||
| | E1 robustness environment | 59.9% | |||
| | E0 clean environment | 59.7% | |||
| GLM-5 | E1 robustness environment | 59.4% | |||
| | E2 robustness environment | 56% | |||
| | E3 robustness environment | 54.2% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | E2 robustness environment | 53.9% | |||
| | E0 clean environment | 53.9% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | E0 clean environment | 53.4% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | E3 robustness environment | 52.9% | |||
| | E1 robustness environment | 52.9% | |||
| GLM-5 | E2 robustness environment | 52.6% | |||
| | E3 robustness environment | 51.6% | |||
| | E2 robustness environment | 51.6% | |||
| Kimi K2.5 | E1 robustness environment | 50% | |||
| GLM-5 | E3 robustness environment | 47.4% | |||
| | E2 robustness environment | 47.1% | |||
| | E3 robustness environment | 46.9% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | E2 robustness environment | 45% | |||
| Kimi K2.5 | E2 robustness environment | 40.6% | |||
| Kimi K2.5 | E3 robustness environment | 40.1% |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official OccuBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official OccuBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%