Benchmark Almanac

OfficeQA Pro V2

Claude Opus 5 54.4% leads since August 2026
Kimi K3.1 Pro 64.4% leads since October 2026
In use 1 known issue

Agents answer 90 analytical questions using about 120,000 pages of U.S. Treasury Accounts of Receipts and Expenditures from 1793 to 2024. Answers are scored by exact match.

Databricks built it for the Grounded Reasoning Cup and released it on August 6th, 2026. It uses a new corpus, so scores are not comparable with OfficeQA Pro. The paper link is the original OfficeQA suite.

Made by
Databricks
Released
August 2026
Kind
Documents and spreadsheets
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 5 #10 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce OfficeQA Pro, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on grounded, multi-document reasoning over a large and heterogeneous document corpus. The corpus consists of U.S. Treasury Bulletins spanning nearly 100 years, comprising 89,000 pages and over 26 million numerical values. OfficeQA Pro consists of 133 questions that require precise document parsing, retrieval, and analytical reasoning across both unstructured text and tabular data. Frontier LLMs including Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview achieve less than 5% accuracy on OfficeQA Pro when relying on parametric knowledge, and less than 12% with additional access to the web. When provided directly with the document corpus, frontier agents still struggle on over half of questions, scoring 34.1% on average. We find that providing agents with a structured document representation produced by Databricks' ai_parse_document yields a 16.1% average relative performance gain across agents. We conduct additional ablations to study the effects of model selection, table representation, retrieval strategy, and test-time scaling on performance. Despite these improvements, significant headroom remains before agents can be considered reliable at enterprise-grade grounded reasoning.

Abstract of OfficeQA Pro: An Enterprise Benchmark for End-to-End Grounded Reasoning (arXiv:2603.08655, CC0)

Known issues

A published audit found a problem in OfficeQA Pro V2. We summarize each finding in our words and link its source. The scores on this page don't include any fixes. See all audits

  1. Broken grader Leaked answers Unclear tasks Trips content filters Fixed in a copy

    Prime Intellect reports that the OfficeQA Pro v2 regex grader rejects many valid answers and that agents with web access retrieved solutions from Hugging Face. It also reports a default prompt that trips Anthropic content filters and some ambiguous tasks.

    The original grader also rejects any answer over 250 characters. On the fixed version, Claude Opus 5.5 at max effort scores 85.6% (average of 4 runs) with Prime Agent, and DeepSeek V4.1-Flash 1017 scores 78.8%.

    OfficeQA is graded using a custom regex- and Python-based extraction and grading script. In practice, it rejects many valid answers

    Learnings from Auditing Public Evaluations by Prime Intellect, November 3rd, 2026

7
Models scored on its own leaderboard
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Claude Opus 5 leads with 54.4% among models released by July 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads with 64.4%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Opus 5 54.4%
  2. 2 Claude Fable 5 45.6%
  3. 3 GPT-5.5 38.9%
  4. 4 GPT-5.6 Sol 33.3%
  5. 5 Claude Opus 4.8 32.2%
  6. 6 Gemini 3.1 Pro 14.4%
  7. 7 Gemini 3.6 Flash 12.2%

Source: Official OfficeQA Pro V2 leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 5 54.4% Claude Code Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Fable 5 45.6% Claude Code Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.5 38.9% Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.6 Sol 33.3% Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 4.8 32.2% Claude Code May 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 3.1 Pro 14.4% Gemini Antigravity Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 3.6 Flash 12.2% Gemini Antigravity Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Kimi K3.1 Pro 64.4% Oct 2026 Lab model card
2 Claude Opus 5 54.4% Claude Code Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Fable 5 45.6% Claude Code Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.5 38.9% Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-5.6 Sol 33.3% Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Opus 4.8 32.2% Claude Code May 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 3.1 Pro 14.4% Gemini Antigravity Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 3.6 Flash 12.2% Gemini Antigravity Jul 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in August 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2026

Source: Official OfficeQA Pro V2 leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K3.1 Pro Claude Opus 5 Claude Fable 5 GPT-5.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K3.1 Pro Claude Opus 5

Sources: Official OfficeQA Pro V2 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Moonshot AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 24, 2026 Kimi K3.1 Pro 64.4 OfficeQA Pro v2

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Anthropic OpenAI
OfficeQA Pro V2 Not tested since Aug 2026
OfficeQA Pro Replaced by V2, Aug 2026
OfficeQA Pro V2 Not tested since Aug 2026

Source: Official leaderboards

More in Economic work

All 97 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
  • OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%