Benchmark Almanac

OfficeQA Pro

Claude Fable 5 60.9% leads since June 2026
Claude Opus 4.7 80.6% leads since April 2026
In use

Models answer the 133 hardest OfficeQA questions by finding tables in U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents and computing exact numeric answers.

Harder subset of OfficeQA recommended for frontier models. Kept apart from the full OfficeQA set.

Made by
Databricks
Released
March 2026
Kind
Documents and spreadsheets
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude Fable 5.2 #1 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2026
Last model added
November 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce OfficeQA Pro, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on grounded, multi-document reasoning over a large and heterogeneous document corpus. The corpus consists of U.S. Treasury Bulletins spanning nearly 100 years, comprising 89,000 pages and over 26 million numerical values. OfficeQA Pro consists of 133 questions that require precise document parsing, retrieval, and analytical reasoning across both unstructured text and tabular data. Frontier LLMs including Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview achieve less than 5% accuracy on OfficeQA Pro when relying on parametric knowledge, and less than 12% with additional access to the web. When provided directly with the document corpus, frontier agents still struggle on over half of questions, scoring 34.1% on average. We find that providing agents with a structured document representation produced by Databricks' ai_parse_document yields a 16.1% average relative performance gain across agents. We conduct additional ablations to study the effects of model selection, table representation, retrieval strategy, and test-time scaling on performance. Despite these improvements, significant headroom remains before agents can be considered reliable at enterprise-grade grounded reasoning.

Abstract of OfficeQA Pro: An Enterprise Benchmark for End-to-End Grounded Reasoning (arXiv:2603.08655, CC0)
12
Models scored on its own leaderboard
5
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
11
System cards report it, from 2 labs

2 models share the top score of 60.9% among models released by July 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

Claude Opus 4.7 leads with 80.6%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Fable 5 60.9%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 5 60.9%
  3. 3 GPT-5.6 Sol 60.2%
  4. 4 GPT-5.5 57.1%
  5. 5 Claude Opus 4.6 51.1%
  6. 6 Claude Opus 4.8 48.9%
  7. 7 Claude Opus 4.7 46.6%
  8. 8 GPT-5.4 41.4%
  9. 9 Gemini 3.1 Pro 39.1%
  10. 10 Claude Opus 4.5 38.4%
  11. 11 GPT-5.1 15%
  12. 12 Gemini 3 Pro 3.00%

Source: Official OfficeQA Pro leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Fable 5 60.9% Claude Agent SDK Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 5 60.9% Claude Agent SDK Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.6 Sol 60.2% Codex SDK Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.5 57.1% Codex SDK Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 4.6 51.1% Claude Agent SDK Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Opus 4.8 48.9% Claude Agent SDK May 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Claude Opus 4.7 46.6% Claude Agent SDK Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-5.4 41.4% Codex SDK Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 3.1 Pro 39.1% Antigravity CLI Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Claude Opus 4.5 38.4% Claude Agent SDK Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-5.1 15% Codex SDK Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 3 Pro 3.00% Gemini CLI Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.7 80.6% Apr 2026 Lab model card
2 Claude Fable 5.2 72.9% Nov 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed2.1 Pro 70.9% Jun 2026 Lab model card
4 Claude Fable 5.1 69% Sep 2026 Lab model card
5 Claude Opus 5.5 67.7% Sep 2026 Lab model card
6 Kimi K3.1 Pro 67.4% Oct 2026 Lab model card
7 Claude Opus 5 66.9% Jul 2026 Lab model card
8 Claude Opus 4.8 66.2% May 2026 Lab model card
9 Tencent Hy4 preview 66.2% Aug 2026 Lab model card
10 Claude Sonnet 5.5 65.6% Sep 2026 Lab model card
11 GLM-5.3-Flash 62.4% Aug 2026 Lab model card
12 Claude Fable 5 60.9% Claude Agent SDK Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Step 5 Preview 60.3% Sep 2026 Lab model card
14 Claude Haiku 5.5 60.3% Oct 2026 Lab model card
15 GPT-5.6 Sol 60.2% Codex SDK Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Claude Sonnet 5 59.4% Jun 2026 Lab model card
17 GPT-5.5 57.1% Codex SDK Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Claude Opus 4.6 51.1% Claude Agent SDK Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
19 GPT-5.4 41.4% Codex SDK Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Gemini 3.1 Pro 39.1% Antigravity CLI Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Claude Opus 4.5 38.4% Claude Agent SDK Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
22 GPT-5.1 15% Codex SDK Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
23 Gemini 3 Pro 3.00% Gemini CLI Nov 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 16 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in March 2026 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Anthropic OpenAI
Own leaderboard Replaced by V2, Aug 2026
Lab claims 1 leader

Sources: Official OfficeQA Pro leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-5.1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.6

Sources: Official OfficeQA Pro leaderboard and labs’ model cards

4 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
Z.ai
Tencent
StepFun
Moonshot AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 24, 2026 Kimi K3.1 Pro 67.4 OfficeQA Pro
Sep 20, 2026 Step 5 Preview 60.3 OfficeQA Pro
Aug 28, 2026 Tencent Hy4 preview 66.2 OfficeQA Pro
Aug 26, 2026 GLM-5.3-Flash 62.4 OfficeQA Pro (Treasury Bulletin PDFs, no embedded text)
Apr 23, 2026 GPT-5.5 54.1 OfficeQA Pro

11 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 9, 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 system card 72.9 OfficeQA Pro, harder 133-question subset, relevant documents preselected and provided as extracted text, max effort, mean of five runs (Section 8.14.1) Capabilities
Oct 7, 2026 Claude Haiku 5.5 system card 60.3 OfficeQA Pro, max effort, mean of five runs (8.10.1) Capabilities
Sep 28, 2026 Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card 65.6 OfficeQA Pro at max effort (8.14.1) Capabilities
Sep 22, 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 system card 67.7 OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, max effort, mean of five runs (8.14.1) Capabilities
Sep 1, 2026 Claude Fable 5.1 system card 69 OfficeQA Pro, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.15.1) Capabilities
Jul 24, 2026 Claude Opus 5 system card 66.9 OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.13.1) Capabilities
Jun 30, 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 59.4 OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, exact match, max effort, mean of five trials (8.11.1, Figure 8.11.1.A) Capabilities
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 70.9 OfficeQA-Pro with internal adaptations (Table 1). Office QA Pro [Multimodal] Avg Score 72.2 (Table 3) Capabilities
Jun 9, 2026 Claude Fable 5 system card 57.9 OfficeQA Pro, Databricks' own evaluation with documents read as images (Table 8.1.A, 8.17.1) Capabilities
May 28, 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 system card 66.2 OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, internal agentic harness, exact match (8.13.1) Capabilities
Apr 16, 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 system card 80.6 OfficeQA Pro, exact-match grading (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.1) Capabilities

The lab's number comes out ahead in 3 of 5 pairs that differ

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap What differs
Claude Opus 4.7 80.6% OfficeQA Pro, exact-match grading (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.1) 46.6% Leaderboard, Claude Agent SDK +34 pts
Claude Opus 4.8 66.2% OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, internal agentic harness, exact match (8.13.1) 48.9% Leaderboard, Claude Agent SDK +17 pts Anthropic uses an internal agentic harness, while Databricks evaluates Opus 4.8 through Claude Agent SDK.
Claude Opus 5 66.9% OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.13.1) 60.9% Leaderboard, Claude Agent SDK +6.0 pts
GPT-5.5 54.1% OfficeQA Pro 57.1% Leaderboard, Codex SDK −3.0 pts
Claude Fable 5 57.9% OfficeQA Pro, Databricks' own evaluation with documents read as images (Table 8.1.A, 8.17.1) 60.9% Leaderboard, Claude Agent SDK −3.0 pts

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Anthropic OpenAI
OfficeQA Pro V2 Not tested since Aug 2026
OfficeQA Pro Replaced by V2, Aug 2026
OfficeQA Pro V2 Not tested since Aug 2026

Source: Official leaderboards

More in Economic work

All 97 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
  • OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%