OfficeQA Pro
Models answer the 133 hardest OfficeQA questions by finding tables in U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents and computing exact numeric answers.
Harder subset of OfficeQA recommended for frontier models. Kept apart from the full OfficeQA set.
- Made by
- Databricks
- Released
- March 2026
- Kind
- Documents and spreadsheets
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Fable 5.2 #1 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026
- Last model added
- November 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce OfficeQA Pro, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on grounded, multi-document reasoning over a large and heterogeneous document corpus. The corpus consists of U.S. Treasury Bulletins spanning nearly 100 years, comprising 89,000 pages and over 26 million numerical values. OfficeQA Pro consists of 133 questions that require precise document parsing, retrieval, and analytical reasoning across both unstructured text and tabular data. Frontier LLMs including Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview achieve less than 5% accuracy on OfficeQA Pro when relying on parametric knowledge, and less than 12% with additional access to the web. When provided directly with the document corpus, frontier agents still struggle on over half of questions, scoring 34.1% on average. We find that providing agents with a structured document representation produced by Databricks' ai_parse_document yields a 16.1% average relative performance gain across agents. We conduct additional ablations to study the effects of model selection, table representation, retrieval strategy, and test-time scaling on performance. Despite these improvements, significant headroom remains before agents can be considered reliable at enterprise-grade grounded reasoning.
2 models share the top score of 60.9% among models released by July 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
Claude Opus 4.7 leads with 80.6%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 12 more
- 1 Claude Fable 5 60.9%
- 2 Claude Opus 5 60.9%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Sol 60.2%
- 4 GPT-5.5 57.1%
- 5 Claude Opus 4.6 51.1%
- 6 Claude Opus 4.8 48.9%
- 7 Claude Opus 4.7 46.6%
- 8 GPT-5.4 41.4%
- 9
Gemini 3.1 Pro 39.1%
- 10 Claude Opus 4.5 38.4%
- 11 GPT-5.1 15%
- 12
Gemini 3 Pro 3.00%
Source: Official OfficeQA Pro leaderboard
- 80.6 Claude Opus 4.7
- 72.9 Claude Fable 5.2
- 70.9
Seed2.1 Pro
- 69.0 Claude Fable 5.1
- 67.7 Claude Opus 5.5
- 67.4 Kimi K3.1 Pro
- 66.9 Claude Opus 5
- 66.2 Claude Opus 4.8
- 66.2
Tencent Hy4 preview
- 65.6 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 62.4 GLM-5.3-Flash
- 60.9 Claude Fable 5
- 60.3
Step 5 Preview
- 60.3 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 60.2 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 59.4 Claude Sonnet 5
- 57.1 GPT-5.5
- 51.1 Claude Opus 4.6
- 41.4 GPT-5.4
- 39.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 38.4 Claude Opus 4.5
- 15.0 GPT-5.1
- 3.00
Gemini 3 Pro
- 1 Claude Opus 4.7 80.6%
- 2 Claude Fable 5.2 72.9%
- 3
Seed2.1 Pro 70.9%
- 4 Claude Fable 5.1 69%
- 5 Claude Opus 5.5 67.7%
- 6 Kimi K3.1 Pro 67.4%
- 7 Claude Opus 5 66.9%
- 8 Claude Opus 4.8 66.2%
- 9
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.2%
- 10 Claude Sonnet 5.5 65.6%
- 11 GLM-5.3-Flash 62.4%
- 12 Claude Fable 5 60.9%
- 13
Step 5 Preview 60.3%
- 14 Claude Haiku 5.5 60.3%
- 15 GPT-5.6 Sol 60.2%
- 16 Claude Sonnet 5 59.4%
- 17 GPT-5.5 57.1%
- 18 Claude Opus 4.6 51.1%
- 19 GPT-5.4 41.4%
- 20
Gemini 3.1 Pro 39.1%
- 21 Claude Opus 4.5 38.4%
- 22 GPT-5.1 15%
- 23
Gemini 3 Pro 3.00%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official OfficeQA Pro leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5 | 60.9% | Claude Agent SDK | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5 | 60.9% | Claude Agent SDK | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 60.2% | Codex SDK | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-5.5 | 57.1% | Codex SDK | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 51.1% | Claude Agent SDK | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 48.9% | Claude Agent SDK | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 46.6% | Claude Agent SDK | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-5.4 | 41.4% | Codex SDK | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 39.1% | Antigravity CLI | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 38.4% | Claude Agent SDK | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | GPT-5.1 | 15% | Codex SDK | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 3.00% | Gemini CLI | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 80.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5.2 | 72.9% | Nov 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 70.9% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 69% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 67.7% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 67.4% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5 | 66.9% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 66.2% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 66.2% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 65.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 62.4% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | Claude Fable 5 | 60.9% | Claude Agent SDK | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 60.3% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 60.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 60.2% | Codex SDK | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 59.4% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | GPT-5.5 | 57.1% | Codex SDK | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 51.1% | Claude Agent SDK | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | GPT-5.4 | 41.4% | Codex SDK | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 39.1% | Antigravity CLI | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 38.4% | Claude Agent SDK | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | GPT-5.1 | 15% | Codex SDK | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | | 3.00% | Gemini CLI | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 16 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in March 2026 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official OfficeQA Pro leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official OfficeQA Pro leaderboard and labs’ model cards
4 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2026 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 67.4 | OfficeQA Pro |
| Sep 20, 2026 | 60.3 | OfficeQA Pro | |
| Aug 28, 2026 | 66.2 | OfficeQA Pro | |
| Aug 26, 2026 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 62.4 | OfficeQA Pro (Treasury Bulletin PDFs, no embedded text) |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GPT-5.5 | 54.1 | OfficeQA Pro |
11 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.2 system card | 72.9 | OfficeQA Pro, harder 133-question subset, relevant documents preselected and provided as extracted text, max effort, mean of five runs (Section 8.14.1) | Capabilities |
| Oct 7, 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | 60.3 | OfficeQA Pro, max effort, mean of five runs (8.10.1) | Capabilities |
| Sep 28, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | 65.6 | OfficeQA Pro at max effort (8.14.1) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Claude Opus 5.5 system card | 67.7 | OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, max effort, mean of five runs (8.14.1) | Capabilities |
| Sep 1, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 system card | 69 | OfficeQA Pro, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.15.1) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | Claude Opus 5 system card | 66.9 | OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.13.1) | Capabilities |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 59.4 | OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, exact match, max effort, mean of five trials (8.11.1, Figure 8.11.1.A) | Capabilities |
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 70.9 | OfficeQA-Pro with internal adaptations (Table 1). Office QA Pro [Multimodal] Avg Score 72.2 (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jun 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5 system card | 57.9 | OfficeQA Pro, Databricks' own evaluation with documents read as images (Table 8.1.A, 8.17.1) | Capabilities |
| May 28, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 66.2 | OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, internal agentic harness, exact match (8.13.1) | Capabilities |
| Apr 16, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 system card | 80.6 | OfficeQA Pro, exact-match grading (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.1) | Capabilities |
The lab's number comes out ahead in 3 of 5 pairs that differ
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap | What differs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.7 | 80.6% OfficeQA Pro, exact-match grading (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.1) | 46.6% Leaderboard, Claude Agent SDK | +34 pts | |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 66.2% OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, internal agentic harness, exact match (8.13.1) | 48.9% Leaderboard, Claude Agent SDK | +17 pts | Anthropic uses an internal agentic harness, while Databricks evaluates Opus 4.8 through Claude Agent SDK. |
| Claude Opus 5 | 66.9% OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.13.1) | 60.9% Leaderboard, Claude Agent SDK | +6.0 pts | |
| GPT-5.5 | 54.1% OfficeQA Pro | 57.1% Leaderboard, Codex SDK | −3.0 pts | |
| Claude Fable 5 | 57.9% OfficeQA Pro, Databricks' own evaluation with documents read as images (Table 8.1.A, 8.17.1) | 60.9% Leaderboard, Claude Agent SDK | −3.0 pts |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
Source: Official leaderboards
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%